Author |
Message |
Ducbsa
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2018 - 05:12 pm: |
|
https://junkscience.com/2018/04/all-the-lies-fit-t o-print-the-nytimes-supports-epa-secret-science/ |
Aesquire
| Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2018 - 08:33 pm: |
|
"Established Science" Phlogiston theory? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory Lysenkoism? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism Lamarckism? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism Oddly some aspects of Lamarck's ideas may be valid. But Establishment Science may refuse to admit that for another century. Since the bulk of his theories are well disproved it's not a big deal. No doubt some modern biologist will get her/his name attached to the new theory and in Time Lamarck will get a footnote, which is proper. Lysenkoism is the name of today's game. Heretics threatened with death. ( several critics of Lysenko were executed or sent to prison camps to be slowly murdered ) Zero tolerance for heresy. Starvation as flawed models are declared settled science. ( hundreds of thousands under Lysenkoism. How many under Greenie mythology? Time will tell. ) I'm operating under "cool me twice" rules. When I know I've been lied to by a group, repeatedly, and they spend their energy and funds to discredit heretics, and they refuse to publish the data, I know who NOT to believe. It will take years for several government agencies to be trustworthy again. It's a great shame. Most of NOAA & NASA are good scientists. Most of the FBI,NSA,CIA, even the soulless minions in the IRS, are just good folk working hard. But when the political appointees at their heads outright lie under oath, & minions leak lies or even commit treason, there's no reason to trust. You'd be stupid to. My not at all humble opinion that the last four Agency heads should be in federal prison for lies & crimes is not germane to science, however. Just examples of good reason to distrust "Established" anything if it comes from known liars. |
Ducbsa
| Posted on Friday, April 06, 2018 - 07:54 am: |
|
https://usa.spectator.co.uk/2018/04/can-scott-prui tt-win-his-battle-against-the-green-blob/ |
Sifo
| Posted on Saturday, April 07, 2018 - 09:41 am: |
|
We've had some fun at the expense of flat-Earthers recently. We have also poked a lot of fun at millennials. Who knew there was a connection? A Third Of Millennials Aren’t Sure The Earth Is Round Now let's poke some fun at the public education system. |
Crusty
| Posted on Saturday, April 07, 2018 - 10:54 am: |
|
|
Hootowl
| Posted on Saturday, April 07, 2018 - 12:33 pm: |
|
The earth isn’t round, but it is roughly spherical. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Saturday, April 07, 2018 - 02:43 pm: |
|
Oblate spheroid to be precise. Pear shaped. And it changes. There's an experiment we could do. Better on a different planet to be sure, Ganymede for instance. Yeah, yeah, it's a moon. Place a Soviet submarine reactor on the ice in Greenland, over the deepest spot, pull the rods & run. It would over time melt a giant lake in the middle of the island. Then the gigatons of water and ice would flow away, the center of the island would rise. I hypothesize that first the oceans would rise as long predicted by others, then fall, but not all the way back to today's level. Plus there would be massive earth quakes, probably Iceland would have massive eruptions, as would the Pacific ring of fire and Mediterranean volcanoes. Most long thought extinct. The anticipated tsunami from the Canary islands undersea landslide would scour the East coast of the Americas, up to the Appalachian mountains. The plume of radioactive fallout would be picayune in comparison. It would be the second easiest way to kill the most number of humans in history by human action. First easiest is embracing Marxism. Higher death toll, more suffering, sadism, dehumanizing rejection of morals and responsibility. Probably faster too. Needless to say the Greenland thought experiment should remain speculation. We need do nothing at all to prevent it. The Other result, however, will take work to prevent. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Sunday, April 08, 2018 - 06:33 pm: |
|
|
Aesquire
| Posted on Monday, April 09, 2018 - 07:07 am: |
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/07/health/antidepr essants-withdrawal-prozac-cymbalta.html |
Aesquire
| Posted on Monday, April 09, 2018 - 02:39 pm: |
|
https://xkcd.com/1977/ https://xkcd.com/1978/ |
Ducbsa
| Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 05:39 am: |
|
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/04/t he_parade_of_impending_catastrophes.html |
Bandm
| Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 12:42 pm: |
|
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2018/04/10/la-paint ing-streets-white-global-warming/ |
Ratbuell
| Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 12:49 pm: |
|
That'll work great, until they find out the chemicals in the coating cause cancer in endangered bird babies...or it starts causing accidents because people are snow-blind from all that bright surfacing. |
S2t_bama
| Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 12:56 pm: |
|
I hope it's not as slippery when wet as most other paint on the roadways! |
Zac4mac
| Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 10:24 pm: |
|
especially the reflective white stuff. grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Z |
Aesquire
| Posted on Thursday, April 12, 2018 - 06:58 pm: |
|
Not Safe For Children. Language. PETA. True descriptions of pure evil. https://9gag.com/gag/ajEVNZx |
Ducbsa
| Posted on Sunday, April 15, 2018 - 05:19 am: |
|
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/04/the- al-gore-effect-comes-to-minnesota.php |
Ebutch
| Posted on Sunday, April 15, 2018 - 07:56 am: |
|
|
Aesquire
| Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 12:26 am: |
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-562 2395/Woolly-mammoths-come-life-SAVE-Arctic-accordi ng-Harvard-cloning-scientist.html Looking forward to this. I'm also ready to start channelling Jeff Goldbloom from Jurassic Park on " but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should. " Mammoth? Great. Not sure about Dire Wolves or Terror Birds. We are not the apex of the food chain now. Adding more on top seems foolish. OTOH, I partly agree we have an overpopulation problem. Unleashing dirt bike speed predators solves the problem the old fashioned way, eliminating Eugenics's moral issue of "who decides?" & would raise planetary IQ. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 08:58 am: |
|
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/04/globa l_warming_claims_a_victim.html Another victim of Global Warming. |
Hootowl
| Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2018 - 09:24 am: |
|
Maybe the first, in modern times. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 04:52 am: |
|
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/04/askin g_animalloving_liberals_about_birdfrying_solar_pan els.html Many. Feathered friends are just the pretty ones. I've talked with pilots about the solar farms and the glare danger of having giant mirrors shine on you as you fly by. Many miles away these things are blinding. Eye of Sauron stuff. I understand watching sparrows explode is the prime recreation for the workers. I'm not against solar power. I just insist on honesty. Ditto wind. I've seriously considered a wind generator. A Windspire vertical turbine seems ideal. A neighboring farm had a diffuser flower turbine now gone. I haven't asked why. A few thousand eagles and condors are not a terrible price to pay for wind power. If only the power was reliable enough to displace conventional coal burning plants then it might be worth it. The Australian example shows it is not, and that pretending it does kills people. That is a terrible price. A hideous price to pay in service to the Con. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 05:18 am: |
|
https://www.americanexperiment.org/2018/04/america n-experiment-responds-critical-energy-post/ I'm not sure the costs are as stated. But the logic seems correct. |
Hootowl
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 03:14 pm: |
|
Good movie. Bad reality. http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/04/18/scientific- advancements-in-pre-screening-embryos-should-make- us-uneasy-indeed-expert-warns.html |
Aesquire
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 03:59 pm: |
|
Who wouldn't want their child to be born free of defects? Free of the parent's genetic flaws? Obesity, heart disease, bad eyesight, teeth, etc. Why wouldn't you want your kids to be healthier and have a better chance at a long, good, healthy life? Even if you saw the movie Gattaca, the above is kind, thoughtful, responsible parenting. That out of the way..... Guys? Wouldn't it be nice for your kid to have superior athletic potential? High IQ? You want him or her to get that Ivy League scholarship, right? Let us be honest, a smoking hot body and well endowed certainly can't hurt their future odds on marrying well. Or happiness? The science fiction fears of super soldiers is way overblown. Killer robots will always be better, cheaper, and much faster to produce in quantity. Khan & the Supermen revolt from Star Trek? Probably inevitable. See David Hogg for what happens when you are told from birth you are a superior little Aryan angel. Now imagine you really were smarter, stronger, better. Would you be happy taking orders from inferior leaders? I doubt it will be a problem soon. But there will be other problems. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/ |
Ducbsa
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 04:51 pm: |
|
Warmist hoaxer predictions: https://realclimatescience.com/2018/04/thirty-year s-of-the-james-hansen-clown-show/ |
Airbozo
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 05:01 pm: |
|
I remember reading an article that stated humans have existed as long as they have specifically because of genetic mutations and that human genes have helped guide the course of our development because 50 year old men were impregnating 14 year old girls for millennia. Since that practice is now illegal in most countries, the gene pool is getting murky. https://scienceblog.com/14203/old-men-chasing-youn g-women-a-good-thing/ |
Aesquire
| Posted on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 - 05:08 pm: |
|
That is nonsense. Now excuse me, I'm off to Thailand to save mankind. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2018 - 03:37 am: |
|
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/04/savin g_the_planeteven_if_it_means_setting_yourself_on_f ire.html The UN position is that climate doesn't matter. Eliminating Capitalism and taking your freedom & property does. Period. End of discussion. |
Aesquire
| Posted on Thursday, April 19, 2018 - 03:44 am: |
|
https://www.strategypage.com/on_point/201804180297 .aspx Oil we got. Dysprosium? That we have to trade for. If you guessed from China? |
|