G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board Archives » Archive through August 05, 2008 » Smart Cars... « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through July 30, 2008Xl1200r30 07-30-08  05:28 pm
Archive through July 30, 2008Darthane30 07-30-08  12:23 pm
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tramp
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 05:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

So, who here's driven smartcars for any good mileage?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnnylunchbox
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 06:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Tramp, Sue's VW TDI when driven sanely can better 50 MPG. I'll call that a smartcar.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnnylunchbox
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 06:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

My Isuzu? Well that's what I call a stupidcar.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xl1200r
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 06:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I guess back on topic...

The only Smart Car I've had up-close experience with was at the NAIAS this past year.

I was very disappointed with the feel of the car - EVERYTHING was cheap plastic, parts were falling off it... just felt like a toy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tramp
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 07:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

So, how many miles did you put on that example, again?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Darthane
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 08:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Heh...well, technically, the car only decelerated from 50 to 0...then ACCELERATED from 0 to 49. ; )

Decelerating from 50 to 0 when you step on your brakes is really not a problem. Decelerating from 50 to 0 when you run into a bridge abutment...well...that can be painful. The rate of deceleration is what causes the damage.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

U4euh
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 10:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

My mother-in-law just put a deposit on one yesterday. She wanted me to take the 'Demo' out for a drive to see what I thought about it.
First impression-which I didn't know, it is manufactured by Diamler Corp. Very small but kinda sporty in a weird way. The shifting is very hard to get used to. It is an automatic with auto-shift capabilities, BUT between each shift, you still have to let off the gas momentarily. The car is very nimble in city traffic, you sit very high in the car so visibility is excellent, sans the rear passenger pillion bar, and the convertible top when folded down. This virtually eliminates any use of the rear view mirror. The plastic body work can be inter-changed, uhm, like the XB series, so buying a different colored set of plastics can get you a different look! It is very well built inside, doesn't seem to be 'cheap' like some of the imports that I have sat in,could be the Diamler engineering. Really had a solid feel on the road. The 'Tridon' roll cage really seems logical when you look at the cut away model they have on the showroom floor.
The cons to me are the gas mileage vs the sticker price. 31 in the city/42 on the highway just doesn't impress me. Not when back in the late 80's, early 90's Honda made the HF models getting 50+ MPG. 15 years later the numbers should be better than they are today! At $17,495 for the Cabriolet model that she put a deposit on, I'd look for a used VW TD anyday, and have room for 2 more in the back seat.
Tramp ask how man miles did you put on it. About 40-45 miles, but I was impressed with the vehicle, no doubt, but again the gas mileage should be better than what they are getting.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 11:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

City driving type fuel mileage is where the tiny vehicles will shine. It takes half the energy to accelerate half the mass all else being equal.

On the highway, the little boxy vehicles suffer due to poor aerodynamics, where being short in length is a major detriment.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reuel
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 02:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

My Plymouth Horizon got 36 MPG with a simple carburetor swap, and it had a 4 banger, and I raced cars I had no business challenging, outaccelerating many more than I should have! That was a 1987 with fuel economy technology that was almost 50 years older than the car.

Discovery had that Future Cars show where it showed a race car doing mid 100s with a 4 banger diesel, getting something like 113 MPG.

I think something shady is going on. Not a conspiracy, just something shady by a whole lot of different organizations.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tramp
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 06:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Some of those Horizons (and Omnis) had the 1.8 VW engine....
Speaking of which, the Scirocco, w/it's attendant aerodynamics, got excellent MPG.
MY Fiat 850 spider got motorcycle-esque MPG...
Until Nader got his mitts on them
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bombardier
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 06:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Do not know about the US delivered model but the Australian ones actually get better mileage on the highway.

6.1 litres per 100km Urban

4.0 litres per 100km Highway

4.7 litres per 100km Combined
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Corporatemonkey
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 07:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

A friend of mine got one of the first 2nd gen models in Seattle. His license plate reads DETHTRP (not joking)

I have put quite a few miles on it. Average fuel consumption has been a disappointing 30-34mpg.

Pros: I dig the polycarbonate clear roof
SUV like seating position
Engine sound (wind the little sucker up, and it sounds like an aircooled 911)
Low cost
Lots of interior room

Cons: Basic plastic interior (I can overlook this for the cheap purchase price)
Transmission, transmission, transmission... (the manumatic has to go... I want a CVT)
Overly eager auto climate control (too aggressive, loud)
Can't go anywhere without stupid people asking about the "electric car"

At first I really liked it, but as I have put miles on it, the novelty has worn off.
For the same money I would buy a little Scion and call it good...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tramp
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 07:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I thoroughly enjoyed driving a Smart during the Winter of '06-'07.
GREAT in snow, fun, outstanding fuel economy.
I note that some folks complain about the trans (It's much like the VW semi-auto of the Super Beetles) while bemoaning the MPG.
This is NOT meant to be a performance car.
it is exactly what a car was meant to be:
A Goddam box with a wheel at each corner for getting from A to B, cheaply.
If you want something else to "wind up" to sound like a "911", I'd suggest a 911...
or for the Fuel-efficiency-minded, a 912.




it's a cinch to pull the old 356 upright and pop a nice, built, brand-new 1.8 upright in
it's place
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 08:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Makes you appreciate the modern high performance economy emphasized cars (like the vee dub's with TDI or the Saab Turbos). Getting 24 MPG city, 33 MPG highway sounds a lot worse then the smart car, but you can put 5 people in one, and I have gotten 26 MPG on the Saab pulling a trailer with two bikes through the mountains. The TDI's probably do even better.

The smart cars probably make a lot of sense when you know they will spend most of their life in stop and go city traffic, and in places where it is hard to find a parking space.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xl1200r
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 09:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I have put quite a few miles on it. Average fuel consumption has been a disappointing 30-34mpg.

Well hell, I've seen 37mpg in my supercharged Chevy Cobalt SS, and I bet that's a LOT more fun to drive.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fester99
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 11:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Here is the smart car you really want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi_CgGGDglY&feature =related
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 11:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Court,

That boxcar story is the stuff of my nightmares, but truly hilarious when its the other guy in such a predicament. That story may also give a whole new meaning to the old adage that "it's all downhill from here."

"I think I can"?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Trojan
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 11:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Did your Smart have a small diesel in it, Trojan?

The US version has a gasoline engine in it that is only rated at 34MPG (hence my earlier comment regarding price/size versus efficiency).


Ours was the 600cc turbo petrol engine version, and mileage was always over 40mpg even under the harshest use. During 'normal' operation it was usually around 50mpg+ but could be made even more frugal with some forethought.

I can't imagine why they would rate it at 34mpg, unless they are measuring the Brabus version or the Smart Forfour (4 seat version, which is just a rebadged Mitsubishi anyway) rather than the original Fortwo coupe.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Darthane
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 12:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

It's a different engine in the US. No turbo, 1L 3 cylinder.

...once again our overly restrictive standards force a superior engine to be shelved when an otherwise excellent vehicle crosses the pond.

I probably would have bought the new Saturn Astra (rebadged Opel) over my Mazda3 if they had left the damned diesel in it, but nooooo...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bads1
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 12:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

City driving type fuel mileage is where the tiny vehicles will shine. It takes half the energy to accelerate half the mass all else being equal.

On the highway, the little boxy vehicles suffer due to poor aerodynamics, where being short in length is a major detriment


These day though Blake people are driving farther for work so at 31 miles to the gallon that suck. You say Aerodynamics ?? I have the worst for that and its ugly to boot. I have a Honda Element (Toaster) It'll give me 27 or so HWY. It is all wheel drive to an extent. The way I see it,it's a wash. Many people spend more time out on the freeway these days and if its going to only give me 31 mpg for that much money I may as well have my toaster get 3 or 4 miles less but get way more for my money.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tramp
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 04:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

And you can, technically, get a motorcycle into the element (bars flipped down), so it serves dual purpose.
Please don't ask why I know this....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bads1
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 08:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I know this... seen this. It's ugly but to be honest its probably the most practical and functional car/truck on the planet.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 08:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I captured my first images of a Smart car parked perpendicular to the curb (now legal in Gotham) today. . . . by golly it fits and fits nicely.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Corporatemonkey
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 08:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

the most practical and functional car/truck on the planet.

I was sad to see mine go

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2008 - 11:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Per someone's request . . .


Smartendicular




Smartendicular2


And a photo of our local club of neighbors who are joining the fuel price protest by switching to more fuel efficient cars. . .


Caymans
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Greest_lightnin
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2008 - 02:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Court.....You got a can opener big enough to get the minivan next to it out? Look at the shadows.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1313
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2008 - 01:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Court,

You don't know how many times I saw Smart's parking like that in Berlin...

On a side note, I saw 2 of dem damn Smart cars in good old (Redneck) Eastern NC today!
1313
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration