| Author | Message | ||
     Aesquire |
Sounds like a ringing endorsement to vote against Hillary.  | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Alfau |
(Message edited by alfau on May 24, 2016) | ||
| Alfau |
 | ||
| Hootowl |
More violent anti-Trump protests yesterday. The more they hate him, the more I like him. You can judge a man by his enemies. | ||
| Aesquire |
A guy I know who would otherwise be a Bernie fan, but supports Trump because he will destroy the Republican Party. Something we can agree on. (Message edited by aesquire on May 25, 2016) | ||
| Alfau |
E = mc2 Einstein developed this remarkable theory: Energy = Mass x Speed of Light squared A brilliant genius as we all know. A lesser known application of Einstein's formula determined: If you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 298 KM/sec (the speed of light) it could be possible for you to sodomize yourself! Should you determine that you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can easily achieve the same result by voting Tump in the upcoming election. I pass this on as a community service. Hope you do too. | ||
| Hootowl |
It's 300,000 km/s. The centripetal force would exceed the tensile strength of your penis, so it would be impossible to sodomize yourself. | ||
| Aesquire |
I agree with Hoot on this one, but you could submit it to http://what-if.xkcd.com/ Lots of fun stuff. Thanks for the Trump endorsement, Alfau. I don't like the guy much, but I value the input. | ||
| Glitch |
why does Alfau care one way or another? if I were from Australia, I'd be rebelling against my own nanny state. watching the way the Australian People just roll over and take it, just amazes me. I guess when you're used to not fighting your own government on any matter, you take to trolling on forums as a release of frustration. you're a sad, sad, little man, and you have my pity | ||
| Glitch |
 | ||
| Sifo |
Funny photochop. The original of that had Clinton's face. It was titled Bill Clinton the Lady Killer.   | ||
| Pwnzor |
Did anybody see Ronald McDonald in the background? | ||
| Sifo |
I just noticed that on the Trump version, his fly has been photoshopped closed!  | ||
| Glitch |
couldn't get the sax edited out, it just muddied it up too much | ||
| Sifo |
You left lipstick on the collar. | ||
| Hootowl |
Is she gripping something in his pant leg? Very subtle. | ||
| 86129squids |
Another gun I guess... | ||
| Zac4mac |
This is my rifle and this is my gun. One is for killing, one's for fun. | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/05/27/ant i-trump-protesters-outside-san-diego-rally-f-the-p olice/ Really makes you want to be one of those paid anti-trump folk, eh? ( actually I could use the money ) The kind of people you want to hang around with? ( If you went to "peace" protests in the '60-70's you may remember many were just there to get high and laid ) Here's a VERY biased report, in essence, blaming the trump campaign for "object throwing" protesters and the reaction the Secret Service had, which was to leave, now, before the RPG's were pulled out. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/05/video-trum p-motorcade-smashes-police-barricade-protesters-th row-objects-leaving-fresno-rally/ No mention of exactly what objects were being thrown. Rotten fruit? Rocks? ( current and long traditional execution method. See Bible. See also, Pakistan, and other slave states ) Bottles? Molotov cocktails? A little editing can make a violent attack justifying deadly force to stop seem like a child's tantrum. Or vice versa. | ||
| Ducbsa |
Attacking the press! http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/05/31/the_p ress_conference_republican_voters_have_wanted_to_s ee_for_years | ||
| Pwnzor |
I liked it. | ||
| Aesquire |
Chuck Tod says Donald's mocking of others, say a Justice, would cause a Constitutional Crisis. Chuck didn't seem to care when Barry dissed the Supreme court on stage. So I can assume Chuck is a Hillary and/or Jeb fan. I think the vast majority of Americans distrust the political press. Bashing obvious bias sells. While I doubt Donald's control on targeting the well deserved contempt, it's a good tactic in this case. What's the reporter who just got called on lying in a trick question going to do? Besides bluster? He's already going to try and destroy Trump. He'd have to become a Republican Establishment Leader to more obviously despise Donald.  | ||
| Alfau |
Thanx for your pity Gitch but i don't need it. Let's not forget you lot haven't won any war for donkey's years. Even pathetic dirt poor country's whip your arse. Your motives are wrong. | ||
| Hootowl |
Which country owns the whip? You weren't clear. | ||
| Rick_a |
With the proper propaganda campaigns and effective brainwashing you too could be smug about your better world due to selling your rights off to the whims of politicians for "the greater good."  | ||
| Glitch |
what, pray tell are my motives? | ||
| Hootowl |
Trump on steroids. http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/06/asia/duterte-drug-de alers-lethal-force-vigilantism/index.html | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/06/wh y_even_never_trumpers_should_hope_he_is_elected.ht ml If you are a “Never Trumper” or even a “#NeverTrump,” I believe that you should nevertheless hope that, if nominated, he wins the general election against either potential Democrat party candidate. Sure, Trump is inconsistent in his views. Sure, he is rude. Sure, he is not a conservative. Sure, he seemingly cannot figure out what team he is on, yet again recently blasting a GOP governor. I would not go as far as to say you should vote for him. I believe that it is up to Trump to make that case. Plus I would not tell someone to vote for a candidate I do not much like and am not sure yet if I will vote for. But vote for him or not, I think you should hope Trump wins. This is not a lesser of two evils argument either. I think “Never Trumpers”, and for that matter Democrats offended by the choices we are apparently getting this election, should hope Trump wins the general election, even if they think this is a race between equal evils. Further, I think they should hope Trump wins even if they view that the business-as-usual corruption of Hillary Clinton, while evil, is less dangerous or evil than some of the unpredictable and dangerous policies espoused by Donald Trump. The first and most important reason for my view is that the entire culture in this country is set up to limit the damage that a President Donald Trump could do. As we have seen with President Obama, the entire culture will stand aside and even help Hillary Clinton do as much damage as she wants. The legislative and judicial branches of government will act as a check on a President Trump. As we have seen with President Obama we cannot depend on the legislative and judicial branches to be a check on a Democrat historic first president. This problem likely will remain with a Hillary Clinton presidency. Also the mainstream press, the so-called 4th estate, has shown for at least the last two decades they only act as a restraint with a Republican president. Culturally the intellectual class supported by the press will act as a buffer against and attempt to block almost anything Trump comes up with. On the other hand the intellectual class and the press will reinforce and push any almost anything Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders dream up. Finally, again as recent history has shown us, the bureaucracy of the administrative branch of government the next president will head will leak or do anything it can to restrain a Republican president, but will do anything, including politicizing themselves, even the IRS, to help a Democrat president. A second reason “Never Trumpers” should hope Trump wins the general election is that a Trump win is what it will take to slay the myth of Trump. A Trump who never runs the government will always in the minds of his hard-core supporters be that perfect president who would have done just what they would have done his entire time in office. Such fans will be seeking Trump or another Trump in the 2020 election. Sure, I have run into Trump fanatics on the internet and yes, many seem to think they should copy their hero and try to insult me and others in supporting their candidate. The natural reaction of many, if not most, is to be against Trump just so the rudest of his supporters lose. These are the people who will be seeking Trump or some other similar candidate in 2020 unless they see their hero make the compromises that every elected president makes. They need to see their guy do things they don’t like. They need to see their guy making deals with “RINOs.” They need to seem him going along with Democrats at times. They need to see him cutting deals with foreign potentates. So even if I don’t vote for Trump, I will hope he wins. If he wins, Trump will likely damage the body politic less than another Clinton presidency because the culture of the nation is set up as a check on him. If he wins, the myth of Trump the perfect president in the minds of his most ardent supporters with be slain by Trump the actual president. | ||
| Aesquire |
https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/06/09/to -win-trump-must-defeat-obama/ Trump should turn the conventional wisdom on its head and accuse the Democrats of being a party of rich people, because only the rich have prospered under Obama and Clinton. This approach has the benefit of being true. The middle class and, above all, African Americans have suffered most under the Obama administration. Trump must go at Obama hard on this and use facts to back it up. For the last six years economic growth never even reached 2.5%. This is the lowest growth rate since the Depression. Now, I repeat myself, I don't like the Donald. But I don't like The Media even more. Why? Because we need about 250,000 people to get new jobs each month to "break even". This number takes into account births, deaths, Legal Immigration, etc. etc. ( not calculated is the deliberate importation of 20 million brand new Democrat Voters since Obama started ) So if the number of people who get jobs in the Labor Dept. report each month is UNDER 250,000, we backslid, and Unemployment went up. But each month the people who fall off Unemployment Insurance no longer count as in the Workforce, so they fudge the numbers. Last report I heard was 85,000 new workers. And Unemployment went down. And no one on Fox or ABC or CNN simply reported the actual facts. They all read the handout from their Masters. There's a difference between paranoia, and utter lack of credibility in reporting. We are so Utterly screwed. |
