| Author | Message | ||
     Reindog |
  | ||
| Hootowl |
Be careful man, the rules will still be enforced against you. The press is not on your side, and the DOJ would love to go after a middle aged straight white non religious minority who stepped out of line. | ||
| Reindog |
 | ||
| Aesquire |
So.... they're going to "leak" the blackmail video of Bill and the teen, underage, sex slave? Is there any other reason to record your guests while they have sex with your supplied entertainment? | ||
| Patches |
Look up MK Ultra- Cathy O'Brien sex slave. Camilla Parker Bowles and Hillary Clinton are cousins  | ||
| Aesquire |
Unlike Agenda 21, that one's not provable. Not saying Hillary didn't assault her, but when you claim mind control your credibility is negative. Sometimes you really have to cull your paranoia parameters. The Federal Reserve and quantitative easing is real. ( printing money backed by nothing at all leading to inflation and collapse) The Illuminati are probably not. The Masons don't secretly rule the planet. George Soros is really an ex nazi who sells gold by the ton. He really does destroy currencies for profit. He really pays for a lot of neo-commie organizations. He may own Barry. Boehner is a hack who cares naught for you and all for his power. The NSA really does read all your e-mail and track all your calls. Google or Apple probably do too. Common core is worse than anyone but Glenn Beck says. Putin really will kill anyone to stay the richest and most powerful man on Earth. Most of the rest is nonsense..... and I could be wrong about any of the above.. | ||
| Reepicheep |
I'm reading a book that is an interview of all the German war generals that survived WWII. It was gathered and written by an English tank tactics expert after the second world war, the generals really opened up to the guy because they studied his work before the war, and applied it successfully during the war. Its a pretty dry read, but lots of political aspects of how Hitler came into and held onto power end up being described. It's pretty eye opening. While I still don't believe in the Illuminati, it paints a pretty clear picture of how a very small group of people really can control and destroy a country if they have the right kind of selfish evil spirit, and enough ruthless and manipulative talent. | ||
| Macbuell |
When I think about this county, its current state and the "leaders", I get depressed. (Message edited by macbuell on March 12, 2015) | ||
| Macbuell |
The worst part about that comment is I have a beautiful 4 year old son that deserves a strong, free country to grow up in that is not lead by a bunch of corrupted, power hungry, self serving, narcissistic ego maniacs. | ||
| Reepicheep |
Thats the part that depresses me. I've accepted I'm screwed since about the age of 15, when I was first smart enough to compare the national debt to social security "savings". Then the Obama administration doubled 200 years of debt in 8 years, and my kids will arrive at the first birthday they can vote owing more just by virtue of being a citizen then the cost of my first house. And probably more debt from one year of college than I accumulated in 6 years. I am sad that we sold out our children, and I couldn't protect them from it. (I was at least able to keep them from being killed in utero... so there is that...) | ||
| Reindog |
There is technical detail in this article. If you disdain FoxNews, then maybe you should reconsider as I doubt MSLSD or the ClintonNewsNetwork is reporting on this. This is REAL bad. Hackers, probing Clinton server, cite security lapses By James Rosen Published March 12, 2015 excerpt: Stirred by the controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state, a determined band of hackers, IT bloggers, and systems analysts have trained their specialized talents and state-of-the-art software on clintonemail.com, the domain under which Clinton established multiple private email accounts, and uncovered serious lapses in security, according to data shared with Fox News. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/12/hackers -probing-clinton-server-cite-security-lapses/ | ||
| Ezblast |
Bernie Sanders please. EZ | ||
| Reindog |
Yes, a Bernie Sanders/Liawatha Warren Democratic ticket is the perfect ticket for a Republican win. I wholeheartedly endorse them. | ||
| Reindog |
 | ||
| Patches |
The National Committee to Preserve Social Security & Medicare https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbPSjQfYtmU | ||
| Reindog |
Early Onset Clinton Fatigue By Charles Krauthammer · Mar. 13, 2015 She burned the tapes. Had Richard Nixon burned his tapes, he would have survived Watergate. Sure, there would have been a major firestorm, but no smoking gun. Hillary Rodham was a young staffer on the House Judiciary Committee investigating Nixon. She saw. She learned. Today you don’t burn tapes. You delete emails. Hillary Clinton deleted 30,000, dismissing their destruction with the brilliantly casual: “I didn’t see any reason to keep them.” After all, they were private and personal, she assured everyone. How do we know that? She says so. Were, say, Clinton Foundation contributions considered personal? No one asked. It’s unlikely we’ll ever know. We have to trust her. That’s not easy. Not just because of her history – William Safire wrote in 1996 that “Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our first lady … is a congenital liar” – but because of what she said in her emergency news conference on Tuesday. Among the things she listed as private were “personal communications from my husband and me.” Except that, as The Wall Street Journal reported the very same day, Bill Clinton’s spokesman said the former president has sent exactly two emails in his life, one to John Glenn, the other to U.S. troops in the Adriatic. Mrs. Clinton’s other major declaration was that the server containing the emails – owned, controlled and housed by her – “will remain private.” Meaning: No one will get near them. This she learned not from Watergate but from Whitewater. Her husband acquiesced to the appointment of a Whitewater special prosecutor. Hillary objected strenuously. Her fear was that once someone is empowered to search, the searcher can roam freely. In the Clintons' case, it led to impeachment because when the Lewinsky scandal broke, the special prosecutor added that to his portfolio. Hillary was determined never to permit another open-ended investigation. Which is why she decided even before being confirmed as secretary of state that only she would control her email. Her pretense for keeping just a single private email account was “convenience.” She doesn’t like to carry around two devices. But two weeks ago she said she now carries two phones and a total of four devices. Moreover, it takes about a minute to create two accounts on one device. Former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood did exactly that. Her answers are farcical. Everyone knows she kept the email private for purposes of concealment and, above all, control. For other State Department employees, their emails belong to the government. The records officers decide to return to you what’s personal. For Hillary Clinton, she decides. The point of regulations is to ensure government transparency. The point of owning the server is to ensure opacity. Because she holds the emails, all document requests by Congress, by subpoena, by Freedom of Information Act inquiries have ultimately to go through her lawyers, who will stonewall until the end of time – or Election Day 2016, whichever comes first. It’s a smart political calculation. Taking a few weeks of heat now – it’s only March 2015 – is far less risky than being blown up by some future email discovery. Moreover, around April 1, the Clinton apologists will begin dismissing the whole story as “old news.” But even if nothing further is found, the damage is done. After all, what is Hillary running on? Her experience and record, say her supporters. What record? She’s had three major jobs. Secretary of state: Can you name a single achievement in four years? U.S. senator: Can you name a single achievement in eight years? First lady: her one achievement in eight years? Hillarycare, a shipwreck. In reality, Hillary Clinton is running on two things: gender and name. Gender is not to be underestimated. It will make her the Democratic nominee. The name is equally valuable. It evokes the warm memory of the golden 1990s, a decade of peace and prosperity during our holiday from history. Now breaking through, however, is a stark reminder of the underside of that Clinton decade: the chicanery, the sleaze, the dodging, the parsing, the wordplay. It’s a dual legacy that Hillary Clinton cannot escape and that will be a permanent drag on her candidacy. You can feel it. It’s a recurrence of an old ailment. It was bound to set in, but not this soon. What you’re feeling now is Early Onset Clinton Fatigue. The CDC is recommending elaborate precautions. Forget it. The only known cure is Elizabeth Warren. http://patriotpost.us/opinion/33839 | ||
| Sifo |
The only known cure is Elizabeth Warren.  | ||
| Sifo |
| ||
| Aesquire |
I'm throwing in another bet on the e-mail thing blowing over. Hillary is counting on how stupid her fans are, and they aren't going to sit through a law lesson on which felonies she committed, and publicly admitted to. They also don't want to hear anything bad about their Gods.. and Hillary is one. In fact, if I was paranoid, or just paid attention, the e-mail scandal is probably a cover for the millions in foreign bribes. Or selling out to Russia. Or some high treason criminal acts. The Clintons are masters of using the small scandal to hide the bigger crime. | ||
| Hootowl |
Question. Did Hillary ever send an email to obama? It would have been obvious that it wasn't a .gov address. And yet we are told that he first learned about it on the news. How stupid do they think we are? | ||
| Ezblast |
A Warren - Bernie ticket could probably beat any Rep. so far offered. EZ | ||
| Aesquire |
Ow. You could be right. | ||
| Court |
The "how stupid do they think we are?" merits thought. I work for a large company. Any e-mail we get, that originates outside our system, has big red EXTERNAL SENDER plastered in the subject line and in a big red frame in the body. We are not rocket scientists and I'd wager we are at about the lowest level of defense. They want me to believe that top secret crap was flying around on Hotmail and Yahoo? | ||
| Sifo |
Question. Did Hillary ever send an email to obama? It would have been obvious that it wasn't a .gov address. And yet we are told that he first learned about it on the news. How stupid do they think we are? An even bigger question is did BO ever email Clinton? It's unimaginable that in four years he didn't. How many times did he email her and never notice it wasn't to an .gov address? This after years of being told how tech savvy he is. Yes, how stupid do they think we are? Another question... How stupid are his true believers? I can see how stupid they expect us to believe they are. | ||
| Aesquire |
I don't disagree, but as to noticing return address. ....... In their defense, they get the same email software we do. Heading says "POTUS" or "Bill" how often do you look past that if there is no attachment to be suspicious of? Also, the Prez and Hillary live in a bizzaro world of minions feeding them memos and info. It's not uncommon in high level executives to not ever see the raw copy unless they want to. In the case of POTUS it's necessary to do the job. Lots of homework to make good decisions, impossibly high noise input. See Jonathan Saint's "Gulliver's Travels". The Kings of one land have "flappers" that edit their input by flapping their hands by the Kings ear, to tell them what to listen to. This was satire and high treasonous, at the time. Absolutely describes today's leaders. | ||
| Reepicheep |
I have personally responded to a work email thread with a note saying "who the hell is XXXX@gmail.com, and why are they being included in this discussion?"... Like Court says, it ain't rocket science. | ||
| Aesquire |
Reep, not for you, but for Hillary, it literally is. My point is Barry and Probably Hillary don't read their own e-mails. Their minions prepare notes on that, short, simple, and edited. I don't know what software is used, but Barry doesn't have time to read all the stuff, he needs it Triaged, and would only get a summary except for rare items. The President may never even see the return address of any e-mail sent him. As far as he's concerned, it's rocket Science, which for HIM means telling Arabs that they've done a great job advancing science back in the 11th Century. And being Wrong about it, like all his Historical knowledge. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/415386/its-h illary-all-way-down-jonah-goldberg?target=author&t id=897 Hilarious part about why picking Hillary because she's a woman, is stupid. | ||
| Aesquire |
It’s perfectly fine to want a woman to be president of the United States. All things being equal, I guess I might prefer it, too. But the question before the country isn’t, “Should we elect a category?” It’s, “Should we elect Hillary Clinton?” And these are wildly different questions. She’d “accomplish” being the first female president in the first second of her presidency. She’d then be Hillary Clinton for the next 126 million seconds of her presidency (Someone will check my math, I’m sure). When someone asks, “Wouldn’t it be great to have a female president?” the correct answer, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, to be sure, is “Yes.” When asked, “Wouldn’t it be great to have Hillary Clinton as president?” The correct answer, again with varying degrees of enthusiasm, is “Oh, dear God, no. No, no, no. No.”  & sooooo true! | ||
| Hootowl |
To or from would only have a name if you added it to your address book, or some admin made an external contact for it in the global address list. Otherwise it would show up as someone@someplace.com or whatever. | ||
| Reindog |
This is the best birthday present I could receive: the rats are eating their own. If true, there is a Democrat war being waged and we have a chance to elect someone in 2016 that can dismantle Obama's "transformation" of The United States of America. NY Post: Valerie Jarrett Leaked Hillary’s Private Email Use to Press by Katie McHugh14 Mar 2015 excerpt: Vengeful Obama confidante Valeria Jarrett went through back channels to leak Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to the press, an explosive new report reveals. The New York Post‘s Edward Klein reports that a source familiar with Bill Clinton said that the former president told him: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.” Jarrett blamed the Democratic party’s 2014 midterm losses on the Clintons’ insinuations that Obama’s unpopular policies, including executive amnesty for foreigners gobbling up American jobs, made the president an “albatross” around the reigning party’s neck. Jarrett, Obama, and Obama’s wife greeted Hillary as a triumvirate of black liberals at the White House after Democrats got thrashed at the voting booth. Under the watchful eyes of his wife and closest senior advisor, Obama told Hillary, the former first lady of Arkansas, in no uncertain terms he would remain “neutral” in the 2016 election — signaling he would not, in fact, support the Clinton candidacy that the media call “inevitable.” Ambitious Democrats are scheming to kneecap a Hillary candidacy before she declares she’s running. “With Obama’s approval, Valerie has been holding secret meetings with Martin O’Malley [the former Democratic governor of Maryland] and [Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren,” a Klein source said. “She’s promised O’Malley and Warren the full support of the White House if they will challenge Hillary for the presidential nomination.” http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/14 /ny-post-valerie-jarrett-leaked-hillarys-private-e mail-use-to-press/ |
