Author |
Message |
Reindog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:18 am: |
|
I am good with Mitt's upcoming Presidency. The current resident has got to go. |
Ft_bstrd
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:21 am: |
|
I would take just about anyone as an alternative to our current offering. |
Panhead_dan
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:31 am: |
|
I recall something Court posted months ago. Maybe a year. Something like "watch Rom". I recall it being not a good thing.... |
Gentleman_jon
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:33 am: |
|
I am totally ready for Mitt. I am even working on my own line of " Learning to love Mitt" nose plugs to show my enthusiasm.
Please don't order yet, I am just getting them priced out with a couple of Chinese suppliers.
|
Ft_bstrd
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:34 am: |
|
It could be a good thing. I'd like to "watch Rahm" go state's evidence. (Message edited by ft bstrd on January 12, 2012) |
Reindog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:39 am: |
|
Court was referring to Rahm Emmanuel. |
Reindog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:57 am: |
|
I would not vote for Ron Paul under any circumstance as he is the quickest road to world conflagration with his "head in the sand" view of America. Gingrich is doing Romney a favor by bringing out issues early even though he is stepping on his own thingy by doing so. The sooner these issues come out is better because it has been surprise attacks that have leveled other Republican candidates. It is better for Americans to hear the warts early. Zero has NO record to stand on and he has a ONE BILLION dollar bill burning in his pocket. He must and will attack using his proven methods of class warfare and racism and will also throw in Mormonism for the cherry on top. Romney will be an ever so slightly right of center President which falls in the sweet spot of American politics. It is far better to have President Romney nominate Supreme Court justices than President Zero. |
Etennuly
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:58 am: |
|
It is again a sad state of affairs when the choices on a vote are "not again" and "this will have to do, because he can win". I would like to see the United States of America become strong enough to elect a candidate to the Presidency based on his abilities and merit. I am not so much anti-Mormon to state this, but I doubt a Mormon would become President under different circumstances. |
Hootowl
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:03 am: |
|
Kennedy was unelectable because he was Catholic. Oops. |
Cowboy
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:10 am: |
|
Romney the white obama. |
Buellinachinashop
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:11 am: |
|
I'm a conservative in a time when all the conservatives scare the bejesus out of me. I'm a fence rider on this election |
Xl1200r
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:19 am: |
|
I'm a conservative in a time when all the conservatives scare the bejesus out of me. I'm not sure how you mean this but I feel the same way. |
Reindog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:35 am: |
|
Buell and XL: I agree as I am a Conservative also. That is one reason why I find President Romney acceptable. |
Zane
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 12:41 pm: |
|
I'll vote for the Republican candidate who ever it is to help remove Obama. There is something about Romney though. I can't put my finger on it but I just don't like the guy. The only candidate that I could get excited about was Cain and he's out of it now. I just want Obama out. Most anyone would do a better job that Obama, even Romney. |
Johnnymceldoo
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:01 pm: |
|
Ill vote 3rd party or not at all if romney gets it most likely. Id rather have 4 more years of undeniable failure with a mandate for something very different with hopes of a better candidate. Id rather be dropped in boiling water than dropped in luke warm water at a slow boil. |
86129squids
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:03 pm: |
|
I'm voting for Colbert. |
Reindog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:20 pm: |
|
Johnny, Got some news for you that you best learn from. Four more years of Zero will impact us for decades. ObamaCare will become an unsustainable bubble that will bring this country down when coupled with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Do you really want this Socialist nominating Supreme Court justices???? President Romney will be an OK president but Zero will continue to fester if too many people vote third party. You best think about it. PS: I'm calling your bluff. I've read many of your screeds here so I know you are just messing around. |
Johnnymceldoo
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 03:33 pm: |
|
Were already on a path that is unsustainable. Im not a "paulbot" but I think there is some wisdom in a foreign policy that closes down bases where they are widely unpopular. Dont spend billions or trillions on a war if our politicians are too pc that we cant reap the spoils of our victory. Dont put lives on the line and tie one arm of every troop behind their backs. We were not attacked on 911 solely because we have rap music and read playboys while going to church on sunday. There is animosity there for our wide reaching bases. There may be horrors on the scale of the holocost in north korea but were not rushing in to save them are we? So this is the line of thinking I have on Pauls foreign policy. Id vote for gingrich perhaps or santorum possibly perry but the parties infatuation with romney is an insult to conservatives and especially gun owners. And no Iam not being sarcastic and I realize this view wont be popular with people I respect here but these are my views. |
Guell
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 03:46 pm: |
|
Im with Johnny on this too, ill vote for someone other than zero, but it probably wont be romney. (Message edited by guell on January 12, 2012) |
Oldog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:03 pm: |
|
I hate to say it but the choice is Romney or Zero, ( unless we get incredibly lucky and we get the NEWT! ) and Zero has to GO! Please don't waste your votes on a protest! every vote is needed, I believe that unless there is a clear popular mandate ( 60+% ) there will be shenanigans by the Chicago crooks relative the election. then some of the stuff City has been sayin may happen...... me I wanted to see Gingrich debate that mealy mouthed con man pile of crap, hey I'd pay to see that! |
Buellinmke
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:05 pm: |
|
The teabaggers hate Romney. Obama is more Christian that Romney. Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama. |
Oldog
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:08 pm: |
|
Remember it aint over listen to all of the candidates I presume that Mitt has the deal sewn up, perhaps not... Vote AGAINST Obama Me I wanted Cain, I like Gingrich |
Xl1200r
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:14 pm: |
|
hey I'd pay to see that! and he's the type of guy that would charge you for it. Newt is at least as big of a crook as zero. (Message edited by xl1200r on January 12, 2012) |
Boltrider
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:19 pm: |
|
quote:Obama is more Christian that Romney.
I'm not sure Obama is Christian at all and that he says he is for appearances only. When you're the President and you accuse others of "clinging to their guns and their bibles," you don't come across as being very Christian. Why would a Christian accuse some else of "clinging to their bible?" Unless maybe the person saying it really isn't a Christian at all. Also, Romney is a threat to steal a good portion of the independent vote, the same vote Obama handily won the first time around. Winning the independent vote swings the election. |
Blake
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:21 pm: |
|
I don't hate Romney, but I'm a tea "partier", not a tea bagger. Running a venture capital firm is excellent training for dealing with faltering economic situations and turning them around, but when you throw congress into the act, it's a whole new game. Let's hope for massive gains in the house and senate. The Dems shall rue the day they ran roughshod over the will of Americans. Buh-bye Obamacare! Joe, tea baggers are most likely staunch Democrats. Most depraved types are. |
Guell
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:29 pm: |
|
Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama. pretty much the way i see it, dont like romney or obama, so neither will get my vote. Is a vote for someone else not a vote against obama? |
Kenm123t
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:30 pm: |
|
Blake #1 |
Mr_grumpy
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 05:41 pm: |
|
Well I for one will definitely NOT be voting for Romney.
|
Buellinmke
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 06:24 pm: |
|
Don't forget that before Obamacare, there was Romneycare. In fact, Obabmacare is just a copy of Romneycare. Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama. |
Xdigitalx
| Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 06:30 pm: |
|
That so? http://factcheck.org/2011/03/romneycare-facts-and- falsehoods/ Remember everything your didn't like about Obama then thionk about what "any" other the Republican candidates would have done in those situations.... then see if you still feel that way. If you do not vote red, Obama will remain. |