G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through February 01, 2012 » President Romney » Archive through January 12, 2012 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I am good with Mitt's upcoming Presidency.
The current resident has got to go.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I would take just about anyone as an alternative to our current offering.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Panhead_dan
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I recall something Court posted months ago. Maybe a year. Something like "watch Rom". I recall it being not a good thing....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gentleman_jon
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I am totally ready for Mitt.

I am even working on my own line of " Learning to love Mitt" nose plugs to show my enthusiasm.


d


Please don't order yet, I am just getting them priced out with a couple of Chinese suppliers.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It could be a good thing. I'd like to "watch Rahm" go state's evidence.

(Message edited by ft bstrd on January 12, 2012)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:39 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Court was referring to Rahm Emmanuel.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I would not vote for Ron Paul under any circumstance as he is the quickest road to world conflagration with his "head in the sand" view of America.

Gingrich is doing Romney a favor by bringing out issues early even though he is stepping on his own thingy by doing so. The sooner these issues come out is better because it has been surprise attacks that have leveled other Republican candidates. It is better for Americans to hear the warts early. Zero has NO record to stand on and he has a ONE BILLION dollar bill burning in his pocket. He must and will attack using his proven methods of class warfare and racism and will also throw in Mormonism for the cherry on top.

Romney will be an ever so slightly right of center President which falls in the sweet spot of American politics. It is far better to have President Romney nominate Supreme Court justices than President Zero.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Etennuly
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 10:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It is again a sad state of affairs when the choices on a vote are "not again" and "this will have to do, because he can win".

I would like to see the United States of America become strong enough to elect a candidate to the Presidency based on his abilities and merit.

I am not so much anti-Mormon to state this, but I doubt a Mormon would become President under different circumstances.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Kennedy was unelectable because he was Catholic. Oops.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cowboy
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Romney the white obama.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellinachinashop
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm a conservative in a time when all the conservatives scare the bejesus out of me.

I'm a fence rider on this election
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xl1200r
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:19 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm a conservative in a time when all the conservatives scare the bejesus out of me.

I'm not sure how you mean this but I feel the same way.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 11:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Buell and XL: I agree as I am a Conservative also.

That is one reason why I find President Romney acceptable.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zane
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 12:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'll vote for the Republican candidate who ever it is to help remove Obama. There is something about Romney though. I can't put my finger on it but I just don't like the guy. The only candidate that I could get excited about was Cain and he's out of it now.

I just want Obama out. Most anyone would do a better job that Obama, even Romney.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnnymceldoo
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Ill vote 3rd party or not at all if romney gets it most likely. Id rather have 4 more years of undeniable failure with a mandate for something very different with hopes of a better candidate. Id rather be dropped in boiling water than dropped in luke warm water at a slow boil.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

86129squids
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm voting for Colbert.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 01:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Johnny,

Got some news for you that you best learn from. Four more years of Zero will impact us for decades. ObamaCare will become an unsustainable bubble that will bring this country down when coupled with Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Do you really want this Socialist nominating Supreme Court justices????

President Romney will be an OK president but Zero will continue to fester if too many people vote third party. You best think about it.

PS: I'm calling your bluff. I've read many of your screeds here so I know you are just messing around.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnnymceldoo
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 03:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Were already on a path that is unsustainable.

Im not a "paulbot" but I think there is some wisdom in a foreign policy that closes down bases where they are widely unpopular. Dont spend billions or trillions on a war if our politicians are too pc that we cant reap the spoils of our victory. Dont put lives on the line and tie one arm of every troop behind their backs. We were not attacked on 911 solely because we have rap music and read playboys while going to church on sunday. There is animosity there for our wide reaching bases. There may be horrors on the scale of the holocost in north korea but were not rushing in to save them are we?

So this is the line of thinking I have on Pauls foreign policy. Id vote for gingrich perhaps or santorum possibly perry but the parties infatuation with romney is an insult to conservatives and especially gun owners.

And no Iam not being sarcastic and I realize this view wont be popular with people I respect here but these are my views.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Guell
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 03:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Im with Johnny on this too, ill vote for someone other than zero, but it probably wont be romney.

(Message edited by guell on January 12, 2012)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I hate to say it but the choice is Romney or Zero, ( unless we get incredibly lucky and we get the NEWT! ) and Zero has to GO! Please don't waste your votes on a protest! every vote is needed, I believe that unless there is a clear popular mandate ( 60+% ) there will be shenanigans by the Chicago crooks relative the election.

then some of the stuff City has been sayin may happen......

me I wanted to see Gingrich debate that mealy mouthed con man pile of crap,
hey I'd pay to see that!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellinmke
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The teabaggers hate Romney. Obama is more Christian that Romney. Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Remember it aint over listen to all of the candidates I presume that Mitt has the deal sewn up, perhaps not...

Vote AGAINST Obama

Me I wanted Cain,
I like Gingrich
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xl1200r
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

hey I'd pay to see that!

and he's the type of guy that would charge you for it. Newt is at least as big of a crook as zero.

(Message edited by xl1200r on January 12, 2012)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Boltrider
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Obama is more Christian that Romney.




I'm not sure Obama is Christian at all and that he says he is for appearances only. When you're the President and you accuse others of "clinging to their guns and their bibles," you don't come across as being very Christian. Why would a Christian accuse some else of "clinging to their bible?" Unless maybe the person saying it really isn't a Christian at all.

Also, Romney is a threat to steal a good portion of the independent vote, the same vote Obama handily won the first time around. Winning the independent vote swings the election.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't hate Romney, but I'm a tea "partier", not a tea bagger. Running a venture capital firm is excellent training for dealing with faltering economic situations and turning them around, but when you throw congress into the act, it's a whole new game. Let's hope for massive gains in the house and senate. The Dems shall rue the day they ran roughshod over the will of Americans. Buh-bye Obamacare!


Joe, tea baggers are most likely staunch Democrats. Most depraved types are.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Guell
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama.

pretty much the way i see it, dont like romney or obama, so neither will get my vote. Is a vote for someone else not a vote against obama?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenm123t
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 04:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake #1
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mr_grumpy
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 05:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Well I for one will definitely NOT be voting for Romney.

































Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellinmke
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 06:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Don't forget that before Obamacare, there was Romneycare. In fact, Obabmacare is just a copy of Romneycare. Romney as the Republican nomination delivers 4 more years of Obama.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xdigitalx
Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 - 06:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

That so?
http://factcheck.org/2011/03/romneycare-facts-and- falsehoods/

Remember everything your didn't like about Obama then thionk about what "any" other the Republican candidates would have done in those situations.... then see if you still feel that way.

If you do not vote red, Obama will remain.
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration