G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Big, Bad & Dirty (Buell XB12X Ulysses Adventure Board) » BB&D Archives » Archive through August 17, 2012 » Red Loctite and XB9 primary swap « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jessemc
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 12:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I've read the service manual and many helpful posts here about the swap and I've got a question/observation. How come no one recommends (or specifically advises against) a pinpoint application of heat to the primary sprocket nut to release the factory-applied Loctite before disassembly?

I'm going to switch to the XB9 primary gearing on my '06 Uly later this week after I pick up a primary cover gasket at New Castle HD.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 01:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Because with the proper locking bar, the primary isn't going to move anyway.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jessemc
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 02:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Ratbuell, the way I'm looking at it is that releasing the bond the loctite creates will result in less force needing to be applied to turn the nut counterclockwise and less force on the locking bar. The loctite on the threads increases the effective torque of the tightened nut.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Andymnelson
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 02:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think it's simply not necessary....that's why.

It really was not that hard to break loose on the 2 bikes I've pulled apart.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tootal
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 10:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I agree, it's not worth it. Putting heat on an oily part will cause smoke, maybe flame and if too much is used you can change the metalurgy of the nut. A breaker bar will break it loose if you lock up the primary sprockets.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Portero72
Posted on Monday, July 30, 2012 - 10:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I used a 2 foot breaker on my 09 and was surprised at how easy it came off.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jessemc
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 07:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I've got a four foot long pipe to slide over the ratchet handle, so I'm set. Thanks for the replies.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 08:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

You're putting 200 lb-ft on the nut when you tighten it (or something equally silly; I don't have my manual in front of me). A little "red" isn't going to make or break the loosening process...it's just there to keep the piece from vibrating off in normal use.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rdkingryder
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 07:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Torque values are different for the 06-07 and the 08 and up.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 08:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

He says he has an 06.

From my 06 manual:

a. Install SPROCKET LOCKING LINK (Part No. HD-
38362).
b. Apply two or three drops of LOCTITE 272 (red) onto
threads of sprocket shaft.
c. Install engine sprocket nut. Tighten to 190-210 ft-lbs
(257.6-284.7 Nm).


As I said above...200 lb-ft or something silly.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rdkingryder
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 08:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yes, my old '07 crank was 200ftlbs, the 08 crank I installed was 165ft.lbs iirc.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jessemc
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 09:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

In one of the threads about the swap someone wrote that Buell issued a service bulletin upping the sprocket nut torque to 240 - 260 ft/lbs for the pre '08's. The 210 ft/lbs was not enough to prevent the nut backing off in some circumstances. The '08 and later models have a plate with locking bolts to prevent backoff.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rdkingryder
Posted on Tuesday, July 31, 2012 - 11:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

07 crank uses nut.



08 crank uses bolt.



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jessemc
Posted on Wednesday, August 01, 2012 - 08:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Pictures don't lie, Rdkingryder

Been looking at too many threads on the swap! When I wrote about the plate with locking bolt I was confusing Jim's MegaNut mentioned in one of the swap threads for the '08+ standard part.

http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/327 77/493265.html?1253981117
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration