G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Archive through May 14, 2004 » Dyno tune results « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 09:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

well the a/f is wayy better but $160 and I got 2hp
78.9 was max. I'll post the charts later
hmm still 10 away from the magic force charts
putting all that crap aside, it runs good and I guess thats what matters.
so it must make aboout 68hp stock?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Timbo
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 10:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Hey Tim,
If it makes you feel any better, my 9R w/factory race kit (filter,ecm,can) had a best run of 74.4. That was about six months ago.

That being said, I just had one of the best weekends ever on a bike. Torching and scorching some of the best twisties California has to offer, with some of the best riders around, including Ferris, Dino, Jim SB and Kidcoocoo (who is not on this board). From Santa Barbara to the Southern Sierras to Yosemite Valley it was truly awesome, but what I'm getting at is that we had a good assortment of bikes, and never once did I feel underpowered or lacking in any way. In fact the XB was very at home and perfomed as well as I could ever ask.

Could I have used more power? Maybe. Did I ever think 'I wish I had more power'? Nope, not once. Take it FWIW.

Timbo
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 11:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

yeah, it runs great.. I do like it, I'm just wondering about all the HAPPY dynos around here

fu
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 11:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Did you have nice sticky tires on?
Was the bike nice and warmed up.
Was it warm and humid? Cold and dry?
Was this the same dyno that ate your tire last time?
EDIT: Does anyone know what the corrected HP of the graph be?
So much can affect a dyno.

edited by glitch on May 06, 2004
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 11:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

tq
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Thursday, May 06, 2004 - 11:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

this is a dynojet 250, but a different one that ate my tire, bike was good and warm.
it shows the temp and stuff on there, the first run is within 2hp of what the run was on the other dyno so I'm thinking its pretty accurate
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Noface
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 12:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I've only had my 9R on the dyno once. It's an old thing at Bozwells HD in Nashville.

My run was 73.4hp. 9r with race ECM, D&D, and K&N filter.

So I guess we're all about in the same ballpark.

And I do agree on the "happy" dyno thing...

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 01:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

and for those who dont know..
9S
Force pipe w/baffle
PCIII-mapped
HiPo O2
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chainsaw
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 09:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

My stock 9 dynod by Aaron Wilson was 76hp.
Blue one's are faster! ; )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Friday, May 07, 2004 - 09:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

>>>My stock 9 dynod by Aaron Wilson was 76hp.

Chainsaw....you feel compelled to resort to hard substantiated facts and objective data I will have you fined.

: )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pilk
Posted on Saturday, May 08, 2004 - 12:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Yeah what Court said, btw Aaron told me that the race stripes on my X-1 were worth 5mph on the salt. I believe him. To bad it rained....or I would have proved the statement.

Pilk
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chainsaw
Posted on Saturday, May 08, 2004 - 09:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Stock XB Dynos
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 04:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

and if my 78.9 was dyno'd on aarons it would probably read ~88
and if I dyno'd a stock 9 on the same dyno up here it would say mid 60's
I've had it on 2 different dynos both say the same thing 76-78 big difference from 78 to 89
either way it runs great and I like it... I'm just saying there is a 10hp difference in dyno readings up here and down there
I might pay them to run a stock one just for the hell of it. I still say it will come up around 66
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Prof_stack
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 06:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Misato: $20 per dyno run this coming Saturday at Downtown Harley. More data to come?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wyckedflesh
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 08:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Misato, your Dyno runs are UNCORRECTED. See if they can give you the CORRECTED numbers. You might be suprised at what you find out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 08:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I believe you loose ~3%/1K' in power... What elevation were the dyno's performed at?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 10:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

around 250ft
hey prof, I'll pay for yours!!
8o)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wyckedflesh
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 10:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

There is more then just altitude when being corrected. Barometric pressure and such as well.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Sunday, May 09, 2004 - 11:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

my first dyno from a few months ago said SAE on it. isn't that corrected?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wyckedflesh
Posted on Monday, May 10, 2004 - 12:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

SAE is but if you look at what you posted in the upper corner it says "UNCORRECTED" which isn't SAE. So your comparing apples to oranges and don't have an accurate comparison.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Misato
Posted on Monday, May 10, 2004 - 01:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

the one above is 'un'.
I had it done 3 weeks ago, SAE, and it said ~76. so I had it dyno tuned (the one thats posted above-uncorrected) and the baseline was 77, then after a custom map it was 78.9. so, SAE=76=uncorrected=77

this one the bike has no changes to the first run above. this is getting complicated. my point is 'sae' and 'un' look like ~2hp

sae

edited by misato on May 10, 2004
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chainsaw
Posted on Monday, May 10, 2004 - 09:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Misato:
Mine was dynoed at around 6,000 feet. I believe I am significantly farther uphill than you. : )
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration