Author |
Message |
Sanchez
| Posted on Tuesday, May 05, 2009 - 09:30 pm: |
|
Holy crap. Why didn't I do this years ago? I can finally ride in parking lots without feathering my clutch against the surging. Thank you, Treadmarks. |
Froggy
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 12:24 am: |
|
|
Skinstains
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 12:59 am: |
|
??? |
Froggy
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 01:08 am: |
|
Remind me to set you up |
Treadmarks
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 04:42 am: |
|
|
Tginnh
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 06:38 am: |
|
Please enlighten the rest of us that missed out on this "old news." Thanks. |
Johnboy777
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 07:19 am: |
|
Hey Sanchez Just curious - what numbers did you end up w/ front and back on your square idle? Did you change any parameters? Thanks John |
Hughlysses
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 08:33 am: |
|
Tginnh- This is a simple change to the ECM programming that Treadmarks discovered a few months ago. It's easily done using the ECMspy freeware. Use the google search function above and you can find numerous threads on the procedure. |
Sanchez
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 11:01 am: |
|
> what numbers did you end up w/ front and back I'd have to go back and look at it again, but I think the rear was 69 and the front was 67. In both cylinders, two of the cells were very close, and two were very different. It was like this: 99 | 68 ---+--- 67 | 48
|
Sanchez
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 11:04 am: |
|
> Please enlighten the rest of us that missed out on this "old news." http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/142 838/323610.html |
Tginnh
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 11:09 am: |
|
Thank you. I have a bad habit of forgetting about the search function. |
Hangetsu
| Posted on Wednesday, May 06, 2009 - 01:59 pm: |
|
Is all it this ECM Spy stuff irrelevant for 09 models? I keep hearing how ECM Spy won't work on 09 models. What to these people do for tuning aftermarket pipes on 08 & 09 models? |