G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Big, Bad & Dirty (Buell XB12X Ulysses Adventure Board) » BB&D Archives » Archive through September 08, 2011 » '07 Crank PM: What are My Options? « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through August 25, 2011Froggy30 08-25-11  06:21 pm
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnboy777
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 08:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Can anyone get us the number of all XB12X's produced in 2007?

Just 2007.

Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnboy777
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 09:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd like to officially go on record right here and now as saying that based on my own WAG
science the 2007 crank failures represent a catastrophic occurrence rate of 1.6%

That means (according to The WAG Institute of Science) that all 2007 Uly owners
have a 1 in 63 chance of having a catastrophic crank failure.

Carry on.


..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 09:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

99.8% of all statistics are made up. : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ourdee
Posted on Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 11:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Automotive? Significant? I worked at a grey iron foundry making engine blocks. They put scores on the defect that made it into a customers hands. Drop of oil on the floor in the garage. Not that bad, maybe a 5. Customer had to walk home, that's a 20. What was considered significant? One customer walking home! Not 2, or 5, or 20. Just ONE.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Union_man
Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 - 12:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Froggy I pinged you.

(Message edited by union_man on August 26, 2011)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Skifastbadly
Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 - 03:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

When I ran a software group, we had two dimensions for bugs...the first was the likelihood of a user running into it (frequency) and the second was the consequences of running into it (seriousness). Serious meant loss of data, crashing, computer bursting into flames, etc. Thus, we would let bugs go 'til the next release if they were frequent but not serious. The serious ones we fixed immediately and sent patches. What's this have to do with the current thread? Nothing, I'm just bored.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration