Here's a link to Sundance's tweets last night (39 in total on this subject) in "unrolled" format, including all supporting documentation:
quote:
[snip]
2. I spent about 18 months in 2012, 2013 and 2014 investigating Broward and Miami-Dade school policies and how those policies transfer to law enforcement practices.
3. My interest was initially accidental. I discovered an untold story of massive scale and consequence as a result of initial research into Trayvon Martin and his high school life.
4. What I stumbled upon was a Broward County law enforcement system in a state of conflict. The Broward County School Board and District Superintendent entered into a political agreement with Broward County Law enforcement officials to stop arresting students for crimes.
5. The motive was simple: the school system administrators wanted to "improve their statistics" and gain state and federal grant money for improvements therein.
6. So police officials, the very highest officials of law enforcement (Sheriff and Police Chiefs), entered into a plan.
[snip]
36. I will give testimony, provide names, outline dates, and give all prior records to any lawyer for use in a wrongful death lawsuit [re: Parkland, FL school shooting - FB] – so long as their intent would be to financially ruin the entire system and personally bankrupt the participants.
Broward County Sheriff’s Office Did Not “Miss Warning Signs” or Make “Mistakes” CTH, Feb. 23, 2018
A few points need to be emphasized for those unfamiliar with the Broward County system. First, with revelations of frequent LEO contact and calls from people warning about school shooter Nikolas Cruz, there’s a common narrative mistakenly being pushed by mainstream media.
The Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) didn’t “miss warning signs” or make “mistakes” in not writing up reports. The Sheriff’s office did exactly what their internal policies, procedures and official training required them to do, they intentionally ignored the signs, and intentionally didn’t generate documents.
[snip]
It is important to understand the policy here. Broward County law enforcement (Sheriff Israel), in conjunction with Broward County School Officials (Superintendent Runcie and School Board), have a standing policy to ignore any criminal engagement with High School students.
When the police are hiding current, actual and ongoing unlawful conduct as a matter of standard procedure on a regular basis, what do we expect the police would do with reports of potential unlawful conduct? Of course they would ignore them.
There is an Obama program to not arrest based on race. That's real and official.
Europe, scandahoovia and England in particular, has had crime statistics faked for years. British politicians wanted lower crime stats to prove their ideology correct, so the police cut back on bothering to take complaints as crimes. You got mugged by an "asian"? ( Pakistani etc. ) Yes sir, we'll get right on that. Then throw it away. Racism causes politicians to ignore, then deny, crimes from certain groups. Rape gone up? No way, that's a lie. But women better stay off the street so they don't get...... what's coming to them? ( why our contempt grows... I wonder? )
Yes we have that here too. Yes. These policies get people killed.
I agree Respect is a major factor in society's decay. So is honesty.
If officials within a heavily weaponized domestic intelligence apparatus (FBI, DOJ, ODNI,) were willing to conspire for a falsified FISA warrant application *for political spying and intents*... how far would they go for their political advocacy position on firearms?
I've avoided engaging in the sanctuary cities controversy because I don't work in law and I don't work with immigration so I don't have a working knowledge of the issues. However, many CA county sheriffs say they don't want to give their share of a declining state budget to federal officers who have their own budget for those exact responsibilities.
Judging by the complexion of the homeless in SF, crap on the streets is due more to mass homelessness than specifically illegal immigrant homelessness.
The mass homelessness is due to the rulers' disinclination to prosecute...well...ANYone in the name of a warm and fuzzy sanctuary paradise that welcomes all and criticizes none.
I'm not sure how you effectively prosecute homelessness. Do you fine them>? Do you put them in jail? Do you force charities to quit give away free services? Do you shoot them?
I think ultimately many on the street simply choose to be homeless, they do not want the government stuporvision which comes from housing subsidies and they're okay with dying early so long as they die "free".
Can't really go after the homeless people per se...but you can enact statutes that prohibit squatting on public land (sidewalks, parks, etc). Continual rousting becomes the definition of insanity though. Until it finally sunk in that "the cops are gonna kick us out so we better not go there in the first place".
The only other option would be incarceration, which would net 3 hots and a cot for the offenders...and huge spending for the municipality.
Illegals? Send 'em home.
Americans? That's the tougher part. But I think places like CA in general, and SF specifically, have just thrown up their hands and given up, and opened the doors to anyone, for anything, anywhere.
It does appear homelessness is now a lifestyle choice since chasing after homeless people on the street is seen as a waste of money. There actually is a huge amount of money to combat homelessness, most if for subsidies for working families. Those are the ones who don't smell homeless.
We salute our great American flag, we put our hands on our hearts for the pledge of Allegiance, and we all PROUDLY STAND for the National Anthem. #CPAC2018
The Last Refuge has the documentation that in previous eras the "media" would have produced. It's outrageous policy, resulting in CYA-ism, cowardice, and political statistics manipulation for fed $$.
So now it comes out that there were THREE other deputies at the school, hiding behind their cars with weapons drawn when the police arrived. The police were NOT happy, and immediately went in the building.
Why do we protect our airports, and our banks, our government buildings, but not our schools? It’s time to make our schools a much harder target for attackers. We don’t want them in our schools. We don’t want them.
When we declare our schools to be gun-free zones, it just puts our students in far more danger. Far more danger. Well-trained, gun-adept teachers and coaches and people that work in those buildings; people that were in the Marines for 20 years and retired; people in the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Coast Guard; people that are adept — adept with weaponry and with guns — they teach.
[snip]
And this would be a major deterrent because these people are inherently cowards. If they thought — like, if this guy thought that other people would be shooting bullets back at him, he wouldn’t have gone to that school. He wouldn’t have gone there. It’s a gun-free zone. It says, this is a gun-free zone; please check your guns way far away. And what happens is they feel safe. There’s nobody going to come at them.
This way, you may have — and remember, if you use this school as an example — this is a very big school with tremendous floor area and a lot of acreage. It’s a big, big school. Good school. A big, big school. You’d have to have 150 real guards. Look, you had one guard. He didn’t turn out to be too good, I will tell you that. He turned out to be not good. He was not a credit to law enforcement, that I can tell you. That I can tell you.
But as I’ve been talking about this idea — and I feel it’s a great idea, but some people that are good people are opposed to it; they don’t like the idea of teachers doing it. But I’m not talking about teachers. You know, CNN went on, they said, “Donald Trump wants all teachers.” Okay? Fake news, folks. Fake news. Fake news.
I don’t want a person that’s never handled a gun that wouldn’t know what a gun looks like to be armed. But out of your teaching population — out of your teaching population, you have 10 percent, 20 percent of very gun-adept people. Military people, law enforcement people, they teach. They teach. (Applause.)
And something I thought of this morning. You know what else? And I thought of it since I found and watched Peterson, the deputy who didn’t go into the school because he didn’t want to go into the school. Okay? He was tested under fire, and that wasn’t a good result.
But you know what I thought of as soon as I saw that? These teachers — and I’ve seen them at a lot of schools where they had problems — these teachers love their students. And the students love their teachers, in many cases. These teachers love their students. And these teachers are talented with weaponry and with guns. And they feel safe. And I’d rather have somebody that loves their students and wants to protect their students than somebody standing outside that doesn’t know anybody and doesn’t know the students, and, frankly, for whatever reason, decided not to go in even though he heard lots of shots being fired inside.
The teachers and the coaches and other people in the building — the dean, the assistant dean, the principal — they can — they love their people. They want to protect these kids. And I think we’re better with that. And this may be 10 percent or 20 percent of the population of teachers, et cetera. It’s not all of them. But you would have a lot, and you would tell people that they’re inside. And the beauty is, it’s concealed. Nobody would ever see it unless they needed it. It’s concealed.
So this crazy man who walked in wouldn’t even know who it is that has it. That’s good. That’s not bad; that’s good. And a teacher would have shot the hell out of him before he knew what happened.
Nigel Farage says he spoke with Trump today after his marathon speech, and thought: "Here is a president at ease with himself. Here is a president in good humor. And here is a president at the very top of his game."
DuckDuckGo is a good, safe, anonymous search engine. It can be educational comparing Gurgle results to DDG results on an identical politically-oriented search term.
Startpage is also good; it uses Gurgle as its search engine, but does the search for you by proxy.
So now it comes out that there were THREE other deputies at the school, hiding behind their cars with weapons drawn when the police arrived. The police were NOT happy, and immediately went in the building.
The whole Russia/Ukraine angle on this makes my brain hurt. So Ukraine, who was/is Russia's nemesis, was doing all sorts of things behind the scenes to fight Trump's election, including having a hand in the Steele Dossier. Senator Mccain was apparently involved with Ukraine as well. But at least some of the info in the dossier reportedly came from highly placed Russians who were claimed to be associates of Putin. Now people formerly in the Trump administration are being indicted for alleged ties to Ukraine.
So the results of a year's worth of investigation into possible Russian collusion is that some of Trump's people may have been involved with Russia's enemy Ukraine at some point? Wouldn't that be anti-Russian collusion?
Beyond that, all charges so far, have nothing to do with Trump or his campaign. It all predates the Trump campaign. It's also all based on very sketchy and vague laws about "registering" as an agent for a foreign country. A law that is virtually never enforced, simply because of the numerous failures in how it's written. The FBI is becoming a partisan laughing stock for anyone who is paying attention. This in itself is very bad. When combined with it's many failures and missteps involving actual deadly crimes that could/should have been prevented, such as the FL school shooting, the Vegas shooting, the Boston marathon bombing, etc., etc., makes them look very bad. Then you have them being uncooperative with telling congress oversight committees what they are doing. I won't even bother going into how they covered up for Hillary and other Dems recently who have committed other actual, and obvious crimes. But sure, frying small minnows for meaningless crimes is a real feather in their cap. Hooray for the FBI!
Video Series Part 3 – The Scheme Team CTH, February 24, 2018
In Part 1 we outlined a historic pattern of FISA-702 surveillance abuse by President 0bama’s top officials within the D0J and FBI.
In Part 2 we outlined how the application for a Title-1 surveillance warrant to the FISA court was intentionally misrepresented.
Here in Part 3 we discuss the roles of people within the D0J and FBI: “The Scheme Team."
VIDEO #3 begins to put a close focus on a specific cast of characters at the highest levels of the D0J and FBI. These were the key players from the 0bama administration, FBI and D0J whose goal was to ensure Hillary Clinton won the election and that Donald Trump lost:
The goal of the video series is to distill our research files into short high-quality ‘special report type’ video segments that are easily digestible – and will help educate people on importance of what is happening. We hope you enjoy the content and will share with those who don’t have the exhaustive amount of time necessary to keep up on the issues. [emphasis mine - FB] Each video is produced by John Spiropoulos, a former MSM journalist and producer for Channel 7 in Washington DC (1979 – 1989).
Chairman Devin Nunes CPAC Discussion – Dueling Memos and FISA Court Abuse CTH, February 24, 2018
Chairman Devin Nunes attends the CPAC convention and sat down for a lengthy Question and Answer session to discuss the ongoing investigations into top-tier corruption within the FBI and D0J. Much of the discussion centers around the abuse of the FISA court system and the politicization of multiple U.S. intelligence agencies.