G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Old School Buell » S2 Thunderbolt » Archive through July 01, 2012 » Rear fender different between 95 and 96? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - 04:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I picked up an S2 fender off ebay several months ago, and finally got around to installing it. Well, attempting to install it. The mounting hole for the left side fastener that goes into the swingarm doesn't line up with the hole in the swingarm. It isn't even close. What am I doing wrong? Do the 95 and 96 S2 have different fenders?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Essmjay
Posted on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - 05:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There was a swing arm change wasn't there? And a recall swing arm. Maybe that is the difference?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - 06:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Ah. Was not aware of the swingarm change. So I need to find a 95 fender. Would really like an OEM piece. Have to keep an eye on ebay.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Essmjay
Posted on Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - 09:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thinking on it, that would not account for the difference since the recall swingarm would have had to mate up with the existing fender. You are talking about the inner cf fender?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Thursday, May 31, 2012 - 09:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The CF hugger, yes.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

S2forever
Posted on Thursday, May 31, 2012 - 11:22 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hootowl, see item 25 page 11 on service bulletin B025A (http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/384 2/B025A-263572.pdf). Hugger won't match recalled swingarm.
So I guess your bike has the update done, the guy who sold the hugger to you did not have it done.
When drilling a new hole, make sure the hugger centers with same space from both tire walls when you look from rear. Your next new tire might be wider (profile is different from makes to makes), one side rubbing against the hugger. How do I know? Mine did.

(Message edited by s2forever on May 31, 2012)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Thursday, May 31, 2012 - 02:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Interesting.

-quote
Late production 1996 S2 and S2T models (equipped with
the later version swing arm) require:
l. Enlargement (filing) of the front left hole on the rear
inner fender to allow insertion of the T-washer.

l Drilling an additional hole in the rear inner fender to
allow installation (the rear left swingarm mount tab
does not line up with the existing rear inner fender
hole).

-end quote

So it appears that the fender I bought was from a late 96 model that had not had the recall done.

Thanks! Mystery solved. I guess I'm drilling a hole.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mtkawboy
Posted on Friday, June 08, 2012 - 06:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I thought just the 95 had the carbon fiber rear fender & the 96 ABS plastic but could be wrong
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Friday, June 08, 2012 - 08:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

They were both carbon fiber.

The 1996 was shot with Vinylon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Saturday, June 09, 2012 - 10:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

My late 95 had a Vinylon coated hugger on it when I got it. Not sure if it was production, or a retrofit.

I have since located and installed a "greenie" to match the air filter though - the early Buell CF work was simply...art. I sit and stare at the rear hugger on my S1W on a regular basis. Especially when it's out in the sun. Just...wow.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration