G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archive through July 26, 2016 » 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidates » Archive through March 23, 2016 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, March 09, 2016 - 10:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/wa iting_for_lefty.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Wednesday, March 09, 2016 - 10:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

She claims she never sent anything marked classified. Well, that's another crime...failing to properly mark classified material. How many crimes has she admitted to now? And yet, no indictment.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Wednesday, March 09, 2016 - 10:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Friday, March 11, 2016 - 10:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)







Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Saturday, March 12, 2016 - 08:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)







Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Saturday, March 12, 2016 - 04:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Sunday, March 13, 2016 - 11:28 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2016 - 06:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.washingtonblade.com/2016/03/14/hillarys -painful-mistake/

....Some good has emerged in the wake of the controversy. Clinton, for the first time, called on states to reform HIV criminalization laws, a welcome and long overdue policy statement. She also advocated for expanding access to PrEP and called on Republican governors to extend Medicaid to those with HIV/AIDS. These are important steps and she deserves credit for backing up her apology with concrete policy initiatives. But the incident underscores an ongoing problem Clinton has with rewriting history, particularly as it relates to the LGBT community. No one disputes that she’s an ally today. And we all know she was woefully late to the marriage party. We can and should forgive that and move on from marriage. But AIDS is different. It’s the third rail. We can’t allow distortions or outright lies in the retelling of that story.

While I don't think the hatred for Reagan on AIDS is truly deserved, it is a matter of Pravda for the Gay Community.

Hillary, as always, will lie to anyone for any reason. I suspect the author's analysis is correct, that Hillary "lied" to curry favor with the anti-Trump conservatives.

Promising stuff to "make up" for her lies is interesting though.

How about you Promise To Give Vets something, like a working VA system, in response to your repeated lies about Benghazi, your E-mails, and most importantly, your lies about how the family of the slain on your watch lie?

Not that I believe you would follow through on that promise. Because, you know, You are dishonest.

BTW, Bernie was on the Congress committee over the VA. Great Job. I think that makes Bernie directly responsible for more dead Americans than Hillary. Who'd a thought?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Monday, March 14, 2016 - 06:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://pjmedia.com/election/2016/03/13/dsouza-hil lary-film-could-earn-me-life-in-prison/?singlepage =true
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - 01:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 06:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://youtu.be/gE4h6tOgVgc
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 10:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 10:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

With a nod to Frank Zappa... Hillary's a modified dog.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Macbuell
Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 11:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't know about Trump but I love that ad.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 10:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Friday, March 18, 2016 - 11:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)











Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Saturday, March 19, 2016 - 09:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)















Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Saturday, March 19, 2016 - 06:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/03/18/dems-in-pa nic-over-hillary-candidacy-our-nominee-is-a-disast er/

Bernie Sanders is the only Democrat not linked to an FBI investigation. If this doesn’t mean anything to you, then you’re too terrified of Trump’s rallies to realize that Clinton could get indicted. Also, if you can’t fathom the possibility of Donald Trump winning, then keep in mind that most Americans don’t trust or like Hillary Clinton. A general election isn’t a popularity contest among Democrats. In 10 out of 10 national polls regarding favorability, Hillary Clinton has negative favorability ratings nationally in all 10.


Be very careful what you wish for, because most Americans have an unfavorable view of Clinton and Bernie Sanders already beats Trump by a wider margin. I’m only voting for Bernie Sanders in 2016 and I explain why in this YouTube segment. Most importantly, Democrats should remember that 33% of Bernie Sanders voters will refuse to vote for Clinton in November, if she becomes nominee.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, March 20, 2016 - 08:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-ghost- corporations-are-funding-the-2016-election/2016/03 /18/2446e526-ed14-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.htm l
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Sunday, March 20, 2016 - 12:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, March 20, 2016 - 03:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/wow-video- black-trump-supporter-stomps-anti-trump-protester- in-tucson/

I thought it was considered good form to stomp someone in a KKK outfit.

That someone in a KKK outfit is a Hillary supporter or paid by George Soros is not a surprise at all. The KKK has always been the action arm of the Democrat Party, and the faked attempts at distancing themselves from their traditional core base are pretty transparent.

If you have a clue.

I was told the "racist southern redneck Dems" voted for Reagan.

I've been told the "racist southern redneck Dems" voted for Nixon. And this was the magic moment when racism went from the Democrat Party, the Party of slavery, the Confederacy, and the Klan, and wafted over to the Party of Lincoln and Abolitionists and mysteriously changed the hearts of 85% of the population.... )

I was told that the "racist redneck Dems" voted for Goldwater.

I also looked this crap up and discovered the abolitionist southern Dems, disgusted with the Jim Crow Democrat race punishment laws, voted for Goldwater, who, like some today, did not enjoy the support of his own Party Leaders, and Lost because he was attacked from both sides.

Yes, Reagan did get a lot of ant-slavery, anti-communist Dems to vote for him in protest for their Party's racist, leftist agenda.

And, yes, Nixon, a quietly religious Quaker, did get a lot of the abolitionist southern Christian voters to go for him.

None of the above got the endorsement of the Klan.

But, Hillary in 2000 & 2006 and Barack in 2008 & 2012, were both endorsed by the Communist Party USA. ( Hillary asked them not to endorse her in 2008, or they would have, at least prior to Barack's rise, just like My Union did. )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 05:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 08:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Most succinct article I have seen yet about why Trump is doing well.

http://nypost.com/2016/03/19/why-its-time-for-a-tr ump-revolution/

And written by a Democrat no less.

(I didn't vote for Trump in our primary, but every time I see some media hit piece on him I sympathize a little more with others who did).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 12:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)







Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Macbuell
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 01:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

For some reason, the more the media, the establishment, both left and right, and everyone else attack Trump, the more I like him.

Simply for the fact that he is basically telling them all to F off every single day and the more he says it the more angry they all get. And quite frankly, I love that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 03:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Exactly. The only positive Trump has to me is the degree to which he is able to manipulate and annoy powerful idiots.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 05:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

So you don't agree with Trump's stance on trade or illegal immigration? Those are two positives that I see in him.

My problem with Trump is his lack of integrity, his record of supporting leftists and their policies, his vague platitudes, and his thin-skinned tirades. I don't trust him on too many issues that are important to me like abortion, Supreme Court nominees, upholding and protecting our rights, ditching Obamacare, reigning-in federal govt over-reach,...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Monday, March 21, 2016 - 07:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

On one hand, we have a general election losing candidate in Ted Cruz (most people believe he is 'too conservative'...which I guess means his opinion of government is too closely aligned with our founding fathers...oh the horror) and on the other, a potentially winning candidate that isn't a real conservative. So...we'll either continue down the road to perdition, and an eventual conservative revolution (by voting or otherwise) or that road will lead to the end of the Republic. People keep saying this election is make or break for conservatism (Bernie will further 'transform America') but I fear we have a whole lot farther to fall before we hit bottom and the revolution (one or the other) comes.

It's going to be a hell of a ride. The sad part is, there's nowhere else to go. The 'shining city on the hill', dimmed though it is, is still the brightest light on Earth.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2016 - 05:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CLINTON_ EMAIL_LEGAL_EXPERTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE= DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-03-22-12-25-26

Spin spin spin.

The law does not say what you read because no one would apply the espionage act to Hillary. Which she broke and bragged about. By the same "logic" if Hillary ate Bernie in public after beating him to death she is fine since no one would apply the laws for murder to a Clinton.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2016 - 05:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-rele ases/judicial-watch-new-clinton-documents-raise-qu estions-on-benghazi-clinton-foundation/

Sure she took bribes and lied to you. At this point what difference. .........
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration