| Author | Message | ||
     Patches |
The LIARS did not Debate on regular TV last night. Are they really that afraid of the American public? Or has the united states of America become that big of a JOKE! | ||
| Hootowl |
Huh? Most people have CNN. And if they don't, CNN streamed it live on their web site. If you don't have Internet access...well...get with the program. And how are you posting to badweb? | ||
| Xdigitalx |
I hope Rand Paul, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham, George Pataki or Donald Trump do not become the R candidate. Doesn't matter who the Dem is, they won't win. | ||
| Sifo |
I was impressed with how Carly Fiorina was able to give Trump a huge smack down with only a few syllables... Then knew to shut up. A typical politician never knows when to shut up. I could live with her a President. I want Allen West, but I never get what I want. I don't want to have to chose between Clinton and Bush. | ||
| Sifo |
Why am I not impressed with the current congress critters?  | ||
| Julie |
 The best the reTHUGlicans have to offer. (Message edited by julie on September 18, 2015) | ||
| Ducbsa |
Maybe if Hillary's husband hadn't been occupied with being "busy" in the Oval Office and then lying about it, he would have taken care of Bin Laden. Thug? Examples, please. | ||
| Aesquire |
History shows that Clinton not only refused to stop Bin Laden...... but also sent a minion to steal and destroy government documents showing his guilt. Clintons apparently love to destroy evidence..... I wonder what Chelsea will destroy? | ||
| Pwnzor |
13 posts in 5 years, and this is what you have to add to the conversation, Julie? | ||
| Mtnmason |
^^^ Profile says she lives in Boone NC - high likelihood she's Sanders all the way. ^^^ That pic does capture my immediate thoughts when I heard him say that. Perhaps he should have prefaced by saying "After the attack that was, in a way, Bill Clinton's fault... (Message edited by mtnmason on September 18, 2015) | ||
| Court |
Julie: Wanna have some fun? . . . read the text of the Iranian Nuclear Deal. I had a few Democrats try to tell me how good a deal it was. My first question to them . . . "have your read it?. None had. They talk out their asses . . there minds are controlled by the same "group think" that McDonald's uses to see Happy Meals. A couple read it. Then they apologized to me . . . and confessed it's a horrible deal. It is. No normal idiot would ever agree to provide nuclear weapons to a county avowed to killing Americans. But . .alas . . .we don't have a "normal idiot" . . we've got a super idiot who was placed in office as some sort of a band-aid by those thinking that they've absolve themselves of years of pent up guilt at the mistreatment of blacks in America. He's been the worse things to happen to blacks in America, the worst thing to happen to the economy and now this stupid deal. He is truly our national shame. Court | ||
| Aesquire |
To defend Julie..... I don't like Jeb either. And I thought we fought a war to not have a hereditary system of Kings? (Or Queens in the case of Hillary the unbelievable ) | ||
| Sifo |
I don't care much for Jeb either, but it does take a special kind of person to not recognize that Jeb was speaking in terms of "since 9-11-01". That was a wake up for our nation that had turned a blind eye to terror attacks toward our nation. The fact that the 9-11 attack was conceived and planned under Clinton must have escaped Julie. Then again, what do you expect from someone who had argued that an unborn child doesn't represent life. I fully expect her to not defend her position on this, just as she did back then. It's a typical progressive hit and run. Julie, feel free to prove me wrong... Engage in the discussion. | ||
| Sifo |
This one is just because it made me laugh...  | ||
| Pwnzor |
If the law of averages can be applied, we'll hear from Julie in 2.6 months with another jewel of wisdom | ||
| Court |
>>>I don't care much for Jeb either, but it does take a special kind of person to not recognize that Jeb was speaking in terms of "since 9-11-01". That was my first thought. If you couldn't understand the most rudimentary of concepts the thoughtful stuff is going to punish a small brain. | ||
| Reindog |
reTHUGlicans, You mean the party of diversity? * A Black man running for president. * A woman running for president. * Two Latinos running for president. * A South Asian running for president. You mean the party that opposed slavery and freed the slaves? You mean the party that opposed Jim Crow laws? You mean the party of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr? You mean the party of equal opportunity? Let's see, the Democrats have running for office: * An old, white woman who has done criminal acts 4000 times worse than Nixon's missing 18.5 minutes. A divider who wages War on Women who her husband diddles? A political hack where the Law does not apply to her. * An old, white man who is a Socialist and whose policies would destroy America. There must be a cure for the disease of Progressivism. (Message edited by reindog on September 18, 2015) | ||
| Sifo |
reTHUGlicans Now that the word thug has been redefined to not mean violent criminal, but simply a person of color, it seems like a fitting label.  | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Julie |
Again - the best you domestic terrorist reTHUGlicans have to offer:  | ||
| Julie |
lol you closeted thugs can insult me all you want  | ||
| Ducbsa |
Have you considered supporting your statements with discussion? It is probably very satisfying to call people that don't agree with you thugs without a supporting argument, but it isn't very valid. You could address the points made above on how Monica's boyfriend did nothing about Bin Laden and how we had no more successful attacks after 9/11 or if it is reasonable to assume that Jeb did mean after 9/11. | ||
| Aesquire |
That lie poster references the Democrat Party during Wilson and what his administration taught Goebbels. Also the unofficial motto of the Soviets. Does Julie know who any of them are? If not...... Satan is laughing. We have had terrorists, here, since 2001. Several "we won't admit he's Muslim" drove into crowds incidents during "W's" regime, and multiple workplace shootings under The O's. And, frankly, R Party leadership sucks nearly as much as D Party leadership. Although it's more fat and happy taking bribes than Communist Propaganda Delusional. No one here defends the Party leaders. Contrast a corrupt party of past greatness, that fought for women's rights, to free the slaves, and for civil rights for blacks..... To the party of slavery, the KKK, welfare dependence, suppression of women, and ongoing eugenics genocide. | ||
| Aesquire |
I admit reTHUGlicans is a pretty catchy buzzword for a twelve year old. Like Democrap, ( I loved that one back during Nixon! I was in jr. High ) or Heinie. ( from WW1 ) | ||
| Ferris_von_bueller |
Who got her panties all in a bunch? | ||
| Ferris_von_bueller |
God made creatures that change according to their environments. That's called adaptation not evolution. There is a difference. | ||
| Aesquire |
The slow revolt we are seeing in the Republican party VOTERS, is to toss out the establishment leadership. There's reason that R Party leaders hate the tea party even more than D Party leaders. I see no such attempt at reform by the D's. The D Party candidates are.... a mummified socialist, a utterly dishonest Marie Antoinette, and a guy who can lock himself in his own car. | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Oldog |
Having read part of the "Iran deal", WOW, a whole lotta nothing, Further I believe that the Iranians have stated publicly that only they can inspect their facilities, that military facilities are off limits. Contradicting the terms of the agreement. The agreement does not really seem to deal with heavily enriched isotopes that they may have in hand, or other weapons grade fissile materials, beyond some vague wording about metallurgy, It seems to me that obama's legacy may be a pile of glowing rubble where NYC once stood. | ||
| Court |
>>>>Have you considered supporting your statements with discussion? I'd be very surprised to see that happen. Frankly, the positions of the Democrats, at this point, stand up to discussion as well as trying to make the case that Hillary Clinton is "honest". Better than 70% of Dems, when polled and ask to describe her in a single word, use "dishonest". I'm not wild about any of the Republican candidates . . . but I also see no one amongst the Dems numbers who I think capable of leading this nation back to the path of respect and prosperity. It's a shame. Those among our number with the talent to lead . . . have simply chosen to avoid the fray. We've been left with comedians and those accustomed to suckllng from the federal teat. |
