"Let's get this done" -- Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan.
Home run!! I trust Ferris will post a link to Ryan's speech tonight so Badwebbers like Darkside can learn, learn, learn. Ryan is a breath of fresh air and is the real deal. It is time for Obama to go back to Chicago with his worn out excuses.
Pony Up for Mitt and donate your time and money to elect Romney-Ryan. Go see "2016: Obama's America" this weekend.
Ryan was really good. The VP debates should be very interesting.
The traditional role of the VP is attack dog for the Presidential candidate. I believe Biden is overmatched in that role, and Obama will have his hands full.
Unfortunately, the table will be tilted more than a little bit between CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN.
Ryan's Masterful Speech: A Fireside Chat With a Nation in Crisis by Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart.com | 29 Aug 2012
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a politician connect with a nation quite like Paul Ryan did it tonight. Ryan has the simple charisma of sincerity. It helps that he is adept at explaining complicated subjects in clear, concise language. But there is something more there, a skill that I’m not sure can be taught or rehearsed. It’s a way of relating to the world, to other human beings--even family and intimate friends--through ideas. Through reason.
It’s a form of leadership we rarely see. In 2008, Barack Obama impressed pundits with his intellect and rhetoric, but beyond his high-flown hyperbole, much of what he offered was mere sophistry. Obama is a man of words, not ideas--of letters but not leadership, as Ryan pointed out tonight. Ryan’s own ideas are not only substantively better but also seem more deeply felt, more passionate and authentic--without trying too hard to be so.
We just saw a future President of the United States on the podium last night. Or two.
Our future is looking brighter with younger Republicans coming up the ranks after Mitt Romney:
Paul Ryan Marco Rubio Condeleeza Rice Bobby Jendall Nicki Haley Susana Martinez Ted Cruz Chris Christie (well fat, not young)
What does the hijacked Democratic Party have? Debbie Wasserman-Shultz? Rahm Emmanuel, the crime boss of Chicago? Anthony Wiener is gone. The Democratic Klansman are dead. So who is the future of the hijacked Democratic party? Who?
This is the PERFECT time for Democrats to reassess their beliefs and wake up to the fact that the emerging Republican Party is who they truly are. Ask Susana Martinez about that.
This is the PERFECT time for Democrats to reassess their beliefs and wake up to the fact that the emerging Republican Party is who they truly are. Ask Susana Martinez about that.
Congressman Artur Davis, former Democrat from Alabama, now Republican from Virginia, who seconded Obama's nomination at the '08 DNC, had something very powerful to say about that two nights ago at the RNC in Tampa:
Wait a minute! We Republicans are supposed to be dirty little racists as Obama and his hitmen keep reminding us.
Look at the above list as well as Artur Davis and if you have a brain AND a heart, come to your own conclusion. Obama's excuses and lies are getting real old. To the Badweb Lefties, remember this. Even the most ardent and diehard Nixon supporter eventually saw light and reason and abandoned Milhouse. Eventually you will do the same to Hussein.
Oh yeah, I forgot Sandra Fluke on my Demo list. She is pretty classless.
SpinCheck: A Factory and the Media's Ryan Derangement Syndrome by Mike Flynn, Aug 30 2012
With even Democrats acknowledging [see referenced article below] that Ryan gave a strong performance last night, the media is in full spin mode attacking the Vice-Presidential candidate. They are hyperventilating that Ryan "lied" in a story about Obama promising to keep open a Janesville, WI GM factory, which eventually closed during Obama's first year in office. And by "lie" I guess they mean that Ryan told a true story they don't like. Such is the state of political reporting these days.
Dems acknowledge Paul Ryan gave an effective performance By Erik Wasson, Aug 30, 2012
Democrats are acknowledging GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan gave an effective performance Wednesday even as they launch an all out assault on his honesty.
“He played the role of vice presidential attack dog. I think he did it very well,” said President Obama’s deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter on Thursday.
But Cutter also criticized Ryan, saying his "lies" and "vitriol" are not what the American people deserve.
There are reports (you look them up) that there is dissension within the Obama reelection committee so I am surprised to see Stephanie Cutter spewing her lies and vitriol. I would have thought that David Axelrod would have safely buried her in a crypt deep below the White House.
Tom, as the libs try to smear Paul Ryan, and as a primer for folks who don't understand Obama's tactics, and in preparation for the left-sided smear campaign that's sure to come in the wake of Mitt Romney's acceptance speech tonight, it seems like a good time to review "Alinsky's Rule for Radicals," which is part and parcel of the Obama spin, divide and conquer regime. The following is from Wikipedia; I'll post the link below.
For all y'all who don't put much stock in Wikipedia, but want to learn more about the Obama official playbook, just do a search online; there's no shortage of revelation to be found. See if you can spot the secret to Obama's success in these rules:
quote:
According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."
Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a "mass army" that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."
RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
I tried to pick a couple of the shortest clips. There are hours of video out there documenting this.
Thoughts?
I'm speechless at the moment, partially because I saw the same type of corrupt proceedings happening at my own local caucus earlier in the year. It should have been no surprise to see it on a national level, but I guess I'm naive.
Let's see. Ron Paul managed to secure 118 out of a total of 2286. That's 5.4%.
The traditional procedure is that the losing candidates ceremonially endorse over their candidates. Ron Paul refused to do this.
Considering that he was a libertarian, he didn't need to, but his 118 delegates would have been at the Libertarian National Conference at the Ruby Tuesday's across the street.
The delegates were invited, but were left by Ron Paul to twist in the wind because he is a self centered, egotistical little banty rooster.
If his followers had cast their vote, what would it have accomplished? Nothing but to be the unrealistic children they have shown themselves to be in every political discussion and debate.
Ron Paul has NO intention to help push a strict constructionist political narrative unless HE gets the credit for it. Did you know that Ron Paul willfully allowed his followers to attack his son:
Couldn't even bother to tell his followers to knock it off? Why? Because he loves the worship. He has spawned an "all or nothing, take it or leave it, I'm gonna take my ball and go home" pool of disciples. We saw this with Perot as well. Same personality.
Did you know they showed a Ron Paul tribute video at the convention:
I sure dont have any problem with him being a morman. I am a news junke and I have never seen or read about any morman hi jacking a plane -blowing up a school bus load of children or any form of terrow. but I sure as hell can name a few others that have and they have some close frends in this admin.
I thought the Romney speech last night was flat for the first 10 minutes, then started to come together for me, then finished with a whimper.
Mr. Romney did just fine. He may not be as "hypnotic" as Obama, but I can live with that.
Both Romney and Ryan are Patriots, and both are genuinely nice, honorable men. We need folks like this in the White House, and at all levels of the political spectrum, folks who deeply care about our uniquely American values, and folks who will make the tough decisions to preserve them.
Folks who understand that they work for US, not the other way around.
A presidential candidate should earn our vote based on his or her record: personal, business and political. Romney and Ryan are bona fide. Obama, sadly, is not.
This isn't American Idol, this is the business of saving our Republic, for our generation and, more importantly, for our children's generation, and their children's generation.
Obama talked a good talk in 2008, and his "American Idol-ness" won him the election. He fooled us. His record as president is a dismal failure any way you slice it.
He does NOT deserve to be reelected. This is America, and we expect, and deserve, nothing but the best. Obama has let us down, badly, and has nothing but hate, devisiveness, fear and smear left to fight with now. (It'll be interesting to see what his October Surprise is. I suspect their will be several October Surprises...)
Romney? Perhaps he doesn't have quite the gift of "presentation" as Obama.
Yet.
For my money, and my vote, I'll take a true Patriot over the flashy-smile-and-lofty-rhetoric socialist hack we currently have in the White House any day of the week.
America, are we better off now than we were four years ago? There is one, and only one, correct answer to this question.