| Author | Message | ||
     D_adams |
I know it's been tossed around a bit as far as what results everyone gets, here's mine. I'm very happy with the low end, ie; sub-2500 rpm. NO, I don't ride it there all the time, but my point is, you can. This was done less than a mile from my house on relatively flat ground. Watch them on youtube in full screen if you want to see them clearly, both are in 1080. | ||
| Dannybuell |
1:30 into #1 lugging then you picked it up a little. Which pipe is #1 using? | ||
| D_adams |
RT-3, EBR has both of my RT-4 pipes right now. You did notice the speed right before that, correct? 30-31 mph, slowly picked up to 35 and then accelerated from there. (Message edited by d_adams on January 31, 2012) | ||
| Gofastalot99 |
That looks great on your bike Dean. Mine is definitely not that smooth, especially under 3,000. What you experience at about 2,400 RPM is what I see starting at about 2,800 RPM with the EBR ECM. Mine is also not as smooth as yours appears to be under 3,000 RPM. The funny (sad) part is that my EBR ECM was smoother when I had the generic download than it is now with the exhaust-specific download. I wish I could put the lower-RPM map from my new stock ECM into my EBR ECM and leave the rest of the ECM just as EBR mapped it. | ||
| Skntpig |
I just put in my EBR map for the RT3 and WOW, just WOW. It previously had the FMF map with the RT3 and there is an amazing difference. Pulls like a train. Thanks Erik, Elves and Dean. |
