G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Old School Buell » S2 Thunderbolt » Archive through December 18, 2016 » Ignition Module Upgrade? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnod
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 04:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Am planning on doing Thunderstorm upgrade,( pistons, heads, cams) to my S2.
I've read quite a few threads about ign. mod. upgrades (race modules)when doing this.
Are they required, do they only come into effect at high rpm, or is it all a bunch of BS that makes no difference on a street bike ridden by an old guy? : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Phelan
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 05:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Handy, and better performing, but not necessary. Not a huge performance gain either. Personally I would just get a Screamin Eagle plug-in module or a stock S1 ignition module to plug in. I can't remember if the S2 is 7 pin or 8 pin, but both can be retrofit to the other.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

4speeder
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 06:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I did the same upgrade last year on my S2 with T-storm heads and pistons and Andrews N4 cams. My bike already had an SE 8k rpm ignition box on it so I didn't mess with it. Even with the bump in compression the bike runs super with no pinging or rattling even when lugged down a little. Pulls hard, steady and smooth, with a flat power curve and is super easy to ride. A very worthwhile and satisfying upgrade, and 92.5 on the dyno.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

4speeder
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 06:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Johnod, I guess my post was more about the T-storm upgrade than it was about your ignition query. Apologies for the unsolicited information.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnod
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 09:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Phelan, isn't the S1 a non thunderstorm engine?

4speed, no problem, always good to hear encouraging words, when you plan on tearing apart a perfectly good engine. : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Phelan
Posted on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - 05:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Correct, but it does run 10:1 compression and .497 cams, same as the Tstorm engine, so it has proper timing curve to match the motor.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnod
Posted on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - 07:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Ok, thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

651lance
Posted on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - 10:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I would install a new ing. mod. You can use a 7 pin adjustable mod from EVO BT or XL. I like the adjustable so you can dial in the advance to the jetting, fuel quality, and compression. The twin tec ones seem to work good.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnod
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 12:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Twin Tec looks good thanks, not right now though, maybe latter.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

651lance
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 02:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

In my S2 I'm running bath tubed heads with EVO BT intake and TC exhaust valves, Andrews springs, flat top Pistons, cv carb, SE 536 cams and a fireball ing. The ing is starting to out on me and I'm going to the twin tec this spring.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Phelan
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 03:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Interesting. I'm assuming you're running 5/16" stem valves then? Are those '87 1100 heads or are they late model 1200 heads with a custom motor mount, or are they 1200, Lightning, or T-storm heads with welded up chambers? Also, the '99-'04 TC use the same intake valves as the Evo BT (1.845"), so you can just as well say they are TC valves, unless the Evo valves are a different length (never measured length). Only the exhaust valves are different head sizes (1.610" for Evo BT, 1.575" for 99-04 TC).

BTW thanks for chiming in Lance; I wish you the best with the upcoming business increase.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lakes
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 05:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I like the Dyatec adjustable ignition module. the one that mounts like stock to frame not the one that mounts at end of crank, as i think mounted there the ignition gets too hot.

Reason i like this ignition is i can set a less aggressive advance curve. i think the SE & Buell performance ignition too aggressive in advance curve. i also like being able to set my rev limit at 6,000, even though my motor can rev string to 7,500 making power. as makes enough HP & TQ at 6,000
plus will last longer, same reason for a less aggressive advance curve, the bottom end bearings will last longer!!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

651lance
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 10:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I did my heads back in 97 before the Lightning heads came out. They are the stock heads welded in and tubed and bigger valve seats to match. The only reason we went to TC exh valves later is I needed new valves and the head was smaller for better flow.

I'm with lakes on the external ing but I like the twin tec is more fine tuning. I have found that I need to move the timing around one in awhile due to the gas for season to season.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Phelan
Posted on Thursday, December 17, 2015 - 12:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Gotcha. Cool beans, thanks for the input.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration