| Author | Message | ||
     Alfau |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aje7bbf0cE Wake up America. Mexicans first. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&so urce=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiF9qDBoqfQ AhWIppQKHVFMAgcQFggeMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikip edia.org%2Fwiki%2FFEMA_camps_conspiracy_theory&usg =AFQjCNF_Hna4e1kQlfY6CHkF6JH1Llr54w | ||
| Alfau |
Hey! I'm an indapendant thinker and a not very bright one at that. In my feeble brain, I can see this in action. I am on no sides accept that i like truth. | ||
| Cityxslicker |
I have been saying for YEARS I can help fix healthcare But talk is cheap. So when I was in Korea I helped a local clinic move to commercial lines of care by adding spa, clinical massage and nutritional counseling. When I was in Ukraine I assisted and coordinated care and aid to displaced war-torn civilians, 30,000 through our portal - personal interaction and direct effort to 6000 of them over the year And since April, I have been working with an international company that coordinates care across languages, currencies and national borders. Live in 20 countries currently. I have applied to the Transition Trump Team for HealthCare Reform (i.e. F*ck ObamaCare) ~ here's to hoping I get their attention. | ||
| Alfau |
It's all in the hand shake. | ||
| Aesquire |
funny. | ||
| Fb1 |
What say you FB1? Your in Western Virginia that is pretty red but gets turned Blue due to all the folks in Eastern, VA. Wolfie, when I look an an election results map, either by state or by county, that breaks down the vote by color, all I see when I see the color blue is cancer. Aesquire said:
^ Bingo. And interesting that he used the word "metastasizing." This ties in nicely with my thoughts on the matter. Virginia now votes blue, thanks to NoVa, despite the overwhelming redness of the rest of the state. We have a blue governor (McAwful), and we just voted for Clinton. Makes me sick to my stomach. Will we ever go back to red? Mayyyyybe...but our cancer may have already metastasized too far. I remember chronicling in the President 0bama thread, in the run-up to the 2012 election, some of the clandestine efforts taking place in Texas to finally turn that state blue. Cancer. And, sadly, the spread is intentional. Our politicians, especially the D's, have not only allowed it, they've aided and abetted it, in return for votes. It's WAY past time to drain the swamp, and I believe Trump will do just that. But cancer is cancer, and it's coming soon to a town near you, rural or not. With Trump I think we'll slow it down, but I'm not hopeful, thinking long term (decades), for an absolute cure. Fingers very crossed, and paying attention. Best, Ferris | ||
| Chauly |
Time to split noVA off as a separate STate of Gummint Employees. How can we expect them to vote to Drain the Swamp when they are the Swamp Things living in that Swamp? Hey Buena Vista and Rockbridge County are Solidly Red, so my conscience is clear. | ||
| Wolfridgerider |
Thanks for the response Ferris. When 50% of the eligible voters sit at home... there has to be a way to get them off their ass to participate. They should also have a demonstration punch card at the poles. No punch, no participation in the demonstration. | ||
| Sifo |
Wolfie, when I look an an election results map, either by state or by county, that breaks down the vote by color, all I see when I see the color blue is cancer. Saw this the other day...  I think it's an outdated map though. | ||
| Fb1 |
What do you think FB? I've been a Megyn Kelly fan for a long long time. She got a bug for Trump for sure, but she is as objective as I've seen in her hard nosed confrontation of those in power. Watch to the end... Geez Blake, that's 7-1/2 minutes I'll never get back.  Thoughts, shotgun style: 1) Turn off your television; there are better places to get your news. 2) Who's the hostess in this segment? With all due respect, she reminds me of a bobblehead doll, not only in her mannerisms, but in her (in)ability to put thought into word. 3) Megyn Kelly met, off the record, with Donald Trump one-on-one during the campaign. She, in the beginning of the campaign, for whatever reason/s, was his enemy. After their meeting she lightened up quite a bit. I still don't trust her, or FOX for that matter. I give her all the props in the world for being able to put thought into word, particularly on the fly; she's very good at this. 4) We had good neighbors stop by for a brief visit over the weekend, fellow conservative Christians who think of themselves as well-informed politically. It's the first time we've visited with them since election night. Virtually the first words out of their mouths:
Quite the contrary, we said. We've predicted this since June of 2015, shortly after Trump announced. We did our homework and honestly, we're not surprised in the least - the country is quite ready for someone like Trump, someone who will (and has the horsepower to) drain the swamp, and we predicted this outcome from the beginning of his candidacy. Our neighbors looked at us with incredulous eyes, and then asked:
Heavy sigh. Dear neighbors, the pollsters DIDN'T "get it wrong" - they were paid, quite handsomely, to provide deliberately flawed results, and then the MSM was paid, quite handsomely, to promote these results. Our neighbors, at this point, were in the beginning stages of sensory overload, and although I did my best to teach them (not for the first time) that when it comes to news the television - even FOX - is their enemy, I'm not sure they yet see the light. How all this pertains to your question, and the video segment with Megyn Kelly that you embedded: The first tripwire alert comes at about 2:18, from the hostess:
Brilliant! Continue to push the meme that the pollsters got it wrong, while simultaneously absolving the corrupt MSM of any responsibility of promoting the deliberately-skewed poll results. Bravo! I've posted up plenty of stuff in the past week predicting, and exposing, this tactic. At apx 3:48 we hear the meme again, this time from Megyn Kelly. At apx. 5:17: "Stunned!" Now I know why our neighbors were so stunned at the election results: They were programmed to be so by the mainstream media (which, sadly, is their only news source). The MSM has been, and continues to be, the enemy. They will certainly change their tone with Trump, however, now that he's President-Elect Trump, to retain any chance at access to him and his administration. In that vein, I was very pleased to see this on Trump's new "transition" website GreatAgain.gov:
^ Source: https://www.greatagain.gov/news/press-information. html Trump called out the presstitutes early and often, and it's obvious he still sees them as the enemy (and rightly so). So why is Megyn Kelly playing nice now? Continued access to Trump and his people, IMO, not only for her, but for her employer. Shucks, he's not even in office yet, and already he's the president. Best, Ferris | ||
| Fb1 |
Source: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/13/sh aryl-attkisson-discusses-media-coverage-of-2016-pr esidential-election/ | ||
| Sifo |
Report: Three Million Votes in Presidential Election Cast by Illegal Aliens It's sad how close they are to stealing elections like this past one. Fortunately, they probably have a hard time doing this in states that aren't already solidly blue, like CA, IL & NY. There really needs to be reform on the election process! | ||
| Hughlysses |
Sheryl Attkisson- Isn't it amazing that MTV produced one of the few honest journalists still remaining in the US.  | ||
| Fb1 |
^
Source: https://twitter.com/JumpVote/status/79784323243674 8288 | ||
| Reepicheep |
How can they verify if someone is or isn't illegal? For the vote, all they have is a name and an address. How do they get from there to citizenship status? Do they use credit header data or something similar to get to an SSN, and then from there get to citizenship? I don't understand how a non government entity can practically do that. | ||
| Fb1 |
^ Don't know, but it's an important reason to include links, such as the two above, so curious folks can do their own news investigating. (Message edited by fb1 on November 14, 2016) | ||
| Pwnzor |
| ||
| Fb1 |
From the InfoWars link posted above:
This is absolute lunacy. | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.mediaite.com/online/dem-strategist-mock s-trump-supporter-beat-up-by-mob-oh-my-goodness-po or-white-people/ I've finally reached the had enough of this crap stage in the total acceptance of the Propaganda machine for riots and violence against Americans. I'm still going to follow my normal rules about not going to riots for my amusement. I learned back in 1968 that was a fine way to get hurt. I think it was Jerry Pournelle who coined the rule, "Don't throw shit at an armed man" aka the "Lesson of 1968" after the quaint practice of throwing plastic bags with dog poo at the Riot police at the Democrat National Convention. ( They react badly to that ) and of course remember the Corollary to the "Don't Throw Shit at an Armed Man" which is "Don't stand next to an idiot throwing shit at an armed man". Wow. Dog poo in a bag. How innocent those times seem after 50 years of communist agitprop. Pretty obviously the police watching the arson and looting are under strict instructions to let the Soros paid rioters party. It's both idle speculation and self obvious fact that if Hillary had won and these idiots were burning Hillary and Obama in effigy that arrests would be many and probably volley fire with machine guns on the crowds. | ||
| Fb1 |
How can they verify if someone is or isn't illegal? Reep, here are a few snips from Gregg Phillips' Twitter feed:
Hopefully Mr. Phillips, who until now I've done no research on, is able to follow up with facts and data for us to sink our collective teeth into. I'm extra-hopeful in that it appears he's collaborating with True the Vote in some fashion. Best, FB | ||
| Reepicheep |
Do they follow up when one person voted twice? That would put some cap on fraud, or at least flag it as detectable, when a person goes to the polls and finds out they already voted (when somebody else voted in their place). And I think they logged the ballot in Ohio, and also tied it to my address, so they know which ballot I voted (or my imposter voted). That would let them "undo" the first vote if the second one proved identity. But it wouldn't stop me from finding people who I know can't or won't vote, and then voting in their place, which could be done reasonalby safely within the limits relevant to those the recent elections were decided by. | ||
| Ferris_von_bueller |
In Baltimore County, Maryland we used to have electronic voting machines. This election cycle they went to paper ballots that you deposit into ONE electronic voting machine that DOES NOT give you any confirmation of your vote. The machine simply notifies you that you vote has been recorded. How in the hell am I supposed to know if the machine recorded my actual vote or changed my vote or simply did not count my vote? | ||
| Aesquire |
You can't. The reason you don't get a paper confirmation is the law. If you got a receipt of who you voted for you could turn it into the nice fellow who drove the bus through the 'hood and picked up all the drunks to vote to prove you voted as requested and get your pint of rotgut. Simple as that. You don't get a receipt for that reason. As to the machine giving you the heads up as to your votes, some models do display that, most do not. The good news is the PAPER ballot can be recounted. IF it was all electronic, or manual mechanical like used locally for decades, there is nothing to recount except a counter on the side of the machine. "said 1234 to 2345 last time, still does" is all you get for confirmation. The bad news for paper ballots is the "sealed" boxes sitting in Democrat Party folk's car trunks waiting to be tossed in after hours to change the real vote. It's true, major changes in the U.S. are directly traceable to vote fraud. Al Franken is illegitimate because of criminals voting, and his vote passed Obamacare. What the absence of other candidates like West who were cheated out of office have done is harder to quantify. You just have to hope that others keep an eye on such things, or keep an eye yourself. Imagine if the vote fraud had worked this year instead of Donald getting a landslide. Would you be out burning businesses? Beating Hillary voters? There in lies the difference between the basic philosophy of the Left/Right in America. They lie by design, by habit, by necessity. Vote fraud is just another acceptable lie. So is Murder and false imprisonment. | ||
| Sifo |
Reepicheep, I'll offer what insight I can on the voter fraud issue. I've spent most of my life just outside of Chicago. They know how to game the system. When you show up to vote, you tell them your name and they look it up on a paper registry. They tear off your voters receipt, and hand you a ballot. You cast your ballot, and do what you want with your receipt. At least it makes it difficult to vote a second time, at least as yourself. Here's were it all goes bad. When someone dies, they never purge you from the registry. I just moved to another state. I know my new state notified IL that I have moved. I also know IL will not purge me from the registry. It's not hard to figure out a bunch of people who have died this year. The ones from previous years are also still dead. You keep a running list from year to year. Same thing with people who have moved. BTW, you can purchase names from the NCOA database (National Change of Address). I used to maintain that database for a direct mail company. Of course, they may have access to the fact that I've moved directly from the state of MI in my case. Unless I move back into my same polling precinct (quite unlikely), I'm as good as a dead person. So it's pretty straight forward to keep a list of names that will not get used to vote legally. So what do you do with that information? You load up a bus, drive them to a polling station, and hand them a piece of paper that tells them who they are supposed to be. It WILL NOT be challenged. Then you take that bus of voters to the next polling station, and so on, and so on. I would really like to find out if I voted back in IL in this election. I have no idea how to find that out though. As for how to determine that votes were cast by illegals, I really don't know. It all depends on the data that you can gather. I worked for many years matching lists of names and addresses, determining which are matches and which are not matches. It was a pretty intensive matter when I was doing that about 30 years ago. I'm guessing that it's gotten better since then, but I worked for the two top companies doing it back then. The best back then was better than 98% if you had valid names and addresses. It's probably better now. It gets tricky in large cities where you may have multiple Frank Smiths living in the same apartment complex. We actually had a database of such situations though. I hate to think about the data that's available on people today. | ||
| Reepicheep |
Makes sense. The "no easy way to see if you voted after you moved or died" is the tell that shows you they want their system corrupt. In ohio, it is tracked on computer and you get a little reciept from a credit card looking machine. Not sure how to go see if I voted later or not though. | ||
| Airbozo |
I have voted absentee ballot ever since I missed voting one year due to work. Up until I started voting by mail I was _always_ asked to prove who I was before being given my ballot. This could be an ID or utility bill. After submitting my ballot I always wonder if it did get counted and I can go to a county website, enter in some info and I get the following reply: You have 1 Ballot Issued. ------------------------------------------------- Ballot 1 Ballot Return Date: 11/09/2016 Ballot Return Status: The returned ballot is good. ------------------------------------------------- Thank You. That is the only proof I get that I voted. | ||
| Aesquire |
http://jalopnik.com/check-out-these-ridiculous-pre sidential-plane-and-limo-1788974950 | ||
| Fb1 |
Perhaps this belongs on the pResident Zero thread, but since that thread will soon fall off the bottom of the QB home page, I'll post it here instead. As the narrator correctly states in the video: Killing America = Fundamental Transformation. The final minutes of the video are quite uplifting, particularly in light of who our next president is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeM_l5mkyYc | ||
| Fb1 |
How can they verify if someone is or isn't illegal? Reep: The answer, perhaps, is found in the following piece just posted-up on The Conservative Treehouse...
Source, more: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/15/tr ump-immigration-architect-the-wall-will-be-built-a nd-there-will-be-no-free-passes/ | ||
| Fb1 |
Blake: Megyn Kelly has just published her new book:  |
