| Author | Message | ||
     Court |
Brutal murders have been hitting all-time highs in recent weeks. . . . but, I notice, you have to dig pretty deep into the story to get to the "illegal immigrant" element of the news. We are allowing folks, on a wholesale basis, to freely enter The United States . . .we are giving them I.D. cards, paying for their education and paying public benefits, intended for less fortunate Americans, and yet there is an outcry whenever someone suggests maybe this isn't the brightest thing to do. I am all for immigration. No country has benefited from immigration more than the U.S.A. But . . . I'm also a fan of declaring a 3 mile "no man's land" along the Southern border and putting a bounty, dead or alive, on the heads of folks sneaking in. If they have drugs, the persona collecting the bounty gets 5% of the street value. I'd not waste time on a wall and I'll bet you the ILLEGAL immigration, at least at the Southern border, would slow quickly. | ||
| Macbuell |
Obama has done more harm than good to the Dems. Look at how many Governorships, state seats and seats in the Senate and House they lost under his watch. If he wants to keep pushing the Dems over the ledge, I say go ahead ... as long as we don't get complacent and keep shining a light on their lies and deceptions. | ||
| Whisperstealth |
Court, love your 3 mile no man's land idea! Wish this would happen. | ||
| Ourdee |
But . . . I'm also a fan of declaring a 3 mile "no man's land" along the Southern border and putting a bounty, dead or alive, on the heads of folks sneaking in. If they have drugs, the persona collecting the bounty gets 5% of the street value. Where do I get my permit stamped this time? | ||
| Fb1 |
No offense taken. Thank you. I'm aware they won't "get out of the way" - it's not in their nature as a whole. The group (Democrats) are too brainwashed, too self-important, to EVER accept another belief set (or to even admit one exists). I don't expect the party to ever budge. Part of my point in posting is to encourage everyone to look at the bigger picture. Yes, 0bama damaged the Democrat party, and yes, lowish-level Dems are fretting about next year's mid-terms. The bigger picture? Trump gives every indication of NOT being your average corrupt high-level politician. And, he gives every indication of following through on the promises that got him elected. The danger that P45 represents to the bad guys - and this group includes Democrats AND Republicans - is that THE TRUTH finally makes the light of day. And just what is this truth? Geez, the list is potentially awful in the extreme, and seems nearly endless. If we have a truly patriotic president who's NOT corrupt - and it seems that we do - a president who is set on truly draining the swamp (and thus revealing all the dirty little AND big secrets this draining will entail), and a patriotic Attorney General who is NOT corrupt - and it seems that we do - the stuff that could actually finally see the light of day in terms of the multiple sins that our so-called leaders have committed (up to and including murder and treason, IMO) would shake our nation to its very core. What if all the shite that's rumored to be true about 0bama, as one example... ...what if all this shite is actually true? THAT'S why the bad guys are pushing SO hard to cut P45 off at the knees. Our country's top officials, including several recent presidents, have been running nothing less than an organized crime syndicate, IMO. This isn't idle speculation on my part; I've become a political junkie during the past eight years, and I study high-level politics a LOT. No, I can't PROVE a damn thing. But, based on my research, I can sure present a pretty compelling argument. Yes, lowish-level Dems (I include MOST of the D senators in this group; there are some highish-level Dem senators seem to be untouchable lifers) are worried about next year's mid-terms...as well they should be. The DNC, for obvious reasons, is worried about this, as well. But step back a little, and look at the BIGGER picture. P45 represents the very strong potential of prison time for a LOT of folks in politics (including, perhaps, some members of the mainstream media). Worse (for the bad guys), P45 represents the very strong potential for convictions on charges of treason. And if I'm not mistaken, the punishment for treason in America is death. The Democrat party has some major problems purely from the standpoint of numbers, and the mid-terms *could* spell the actual end of the party (fingers crossed...) But, the problems facing the bad guys right now are MUCH bigger and MUCH more pressing than losing some more seats in Congress, or losing another Governorship. The bad guys are facing the very real possibility of hard time. Or worse. The bad guys aren't going to play along, or get out of the way; they've got way too much to lose to adopt such a passive posture. Ratbuell, thanks for interpreting my previous post in the positive manner in which it was presented, and I appreciate the discussion. FB | ||
| Fb1 |
Here's a snip from today's Mid-Day Digest from the Patriot Post:
Source, LOTS more, including multiple hot-linked citations: https://patriotpost.us/articles/47778 | ||
| Fb1 |
http://investmentwatchblog.com/is-obamas-organizat ion-ofa-in-violation-of-the-18-u-s-code-2385-he-is -using-this-organization-to-overthrow-president-tr ump/ ^ Published today by Pamela Williams at Investment Watch Blog; excellent study material. | ||
| Fb1 |
Yeah, it's InfoWars; who are you going to believe, them or CNN?
Source, more: http://www.infowars.com/obamas-goal-to-oust-trump- from-presidency-via-impeachment-or-resignation/ Pop quiz: Can anyone tell me VJ's official title during 0bama's tenure in the White House? Can anyone tell me why she had her own Secret Service detail? | ||
| Fb1 |
Interesting, informative video from two weeks ago:
| ||
| Fb1 |
This is relatively old news, but is making the rounds again for obvious reasons:
Source, more: http://www.worldtribune.com/valerie-jarretts-daugh ter-tapped-by-cnn-to-cover-the-justice-department/ | ||
| Fb1 |
It used to be understood that the previous President doesn't publicly criticize the current President. BO certainly enjoyed that courtesy during his term in office. So it appears that instead of respecting, and abiding by that tradition, BO is going to double down and actually organize to criticize his successor. Sifo, this goes WAY beyond criticism:
Source, more: http://www.worldtribune.com/government-in-exile-ob amas-d-c-mansion-cannot-be-used-for-political-purp oses/ ^ This, obviously, is unprecedented (and quite troubling). One wonders who's paying the rent... | ||
| Aesquire |
For Valerie? Either George Soros, or the OPEC nations. Probably both. It could be Vladimir Putin, but that would just be too ironic, wouldn't it? Remember, Obama's campaign took in over a Billion dollars from foreign sources, mostly OPEC nations, Syria, Ukraine, Russia, etc. Some of that money came After they changed the name to protect the guilty, but by most estimates Barry took in almost a Billion dollars completely illegally. By now most of the evidence has been destroyed, so the only hope of finding the full amount of bribes taken depends on a "traitor" from the Obama camp, and those are rare, since the DNC & Obama have a proven track record of personal destruction. Their minds immediately go to revenge. "don't want a bullet in the back of the head like that wikileaker, do you?" | ||
| Aesquire |
https://medium.com/theyoungturks/the-basic-formula -for-every-shocking-russia-trump-revelation-e9ae39 0d9f05#.3zkd7d777 | ||
| Ratbuell |
...makes me anxious for the Breitbart autopsy report... Wasn't VJ the kids' nanny? At least, supposedly? Past presidents get Secret Service, yes? Wonder how many of the O's detail are part of the FOP / LEO / Trump supporter camp.... Just...pondering out loud. And it's nice to see the O hasn't learned a ••••••• thing about the element of surprise. Idiot. | ||
| Ratbuell |
Also, I agree on the "down in flames" potential for corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle, should P45 be allowed to fulfill his campaign promises. I'm looking forward to the convictions. And I understand their fear (and subsequent more-irrational-than-usual behavior) about losing more than just their jobs. They should be scared. And I give P45 enough credit to be sly like a fox - not in a deceit-way, but in an "I-know-exactly-what-I'm-allowed-to-do-by-law" way. I don't see him stepping out of line and breaking any laws, nor do I see him allowing any of his cabinet or advisors to do so either. Not that the press won't try and promote the idea that any of them have, whenever it's convenient for their purposes. He's shrewd. He's surrounding himself with other shrewd folk. I don't see any of them making any of the dumb mistakes the Dems or the MSM are promoting. And I have a feeling (a hope? Maybe more than hope...) that once he's firmly in place, and has all his ducks in a row...we'll see a major offensive action against all of them. He's talking smack to the MSM and the Dems now...pretty soon he'll be in a place he can back it up with action. | ||
| Fb1 |
Wasn't VJ the kids' nanny? At least, supposedly? I've never heard that, but it's quite possible that was the formal "excuse" for her being there. Have you ever done any digging into who she is, where she comes from, who supports her, and what she believes in? I have, and there have been several "Aha!" moments. I've read, repeatedly, that she actually ran the White House. She isn't at the top of THE food chain, of course, but it doesn't stretch my imagination much to imagine she was at the top of the White House command structure. Past presidents get Secret Service, yes? Yep, which is one of the reasons I've heard floated that she actually moved in with the 0's - she lost her prior SS protection on inauguration day. One would think, in a sane world, that news of this "collaboration" - the new-and-improved OFA, an organization intent on removing a lawfully-elected president from office and LED BY A FORMER PRESIDENT! - would be absolutely dominating the airwaves. Grumble, grumble...  | ||
| Fb1 |
By Paul Joseph Watson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBTMKLmdpho Coup, anyone? | ||
| Fb1 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_qVjMYpl9o Amen.  | ||
| Ourdee |
the new-and-improved OFA, an organization intent on removing a lawfully-elected president from office and I would say that would be the line in the sand that delineates TREASON. | ||
| Ourdee |
Can anyone post a copy of the oath sworn by secret service members? | ||
| Sifo |
Sifo, this goes WAY beyond criticism: You are likely correct. I only stated what could easily be seen without connecting other dots. There's lots and lots of dots out there. It could be Vladimir Putin, but that would just be too ironic, wouldn't it? Ironic? Yes? Unbelievable? Not at all. For a long time it has seemed self evident that if you want a sense of what the Democrats are up to, just take a look at what they are accusing the Republican of doing. Funny thing, but you see the exact same thing happening with 1st thru 3rd graders in group situations. I'm sure there's a psyco-bable term for it. | ||
| Aesquire |
Oh, come on. It's not treason to attempt to impeach the President by any means necessary, Hail Hydra! However, while it's not treason for the Former President to tell AQ & ISIS his plans to keep them going when he's President, ( the President can decide to reveal classified information ) it is when he does the same after leaving office. Barry is subject to the same laws as you are, now. As if. One thing Trump might consider as part of his assault on deep evil is to secretly approve extradition papers for Hungary to take George Soros back for trial in the middle of the night. Iirc Hungary has charged Soros with messing with their election and trying to overthrow the elected government. That would be the wake up call on a day filled with arrests and indictments. Sifo, the "blame my enemy for my crimes" aspect of D Party sop is what convinced me that there is endemic pedophile problems in DC. Milo for press secretary. | ||
| Fb1 |
This is a MUST read; this is the best, most in-depth explanation of 0bama's OFA that I've read to date. Seriously, take the time to read this: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/03/ob ama_organizing_for_action_and_the_death_throes_of_ the_democratic_party.html | ||
| Fb1 |
From three weeks ago:
Source, more: http://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming -to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/ ^^^THIS^^^ is real news, and should be dominating the airwaves. | ||
| Fb1 |
 | ||
| Ratbuell |
...it is awfully nice of them to consolidate targets like they're doing... Just sayin'. | ||
| Fb1 |
Interesting. From Michael Savage's radio program FIVE YEARS AGO (02/17/2012). Related to what's going on NOW with OFA? https://youtu.be/znR19WWObsw | ||
| Fb1 |
From the OFA's website:
Source: https://www.ofa.us/faq/ ^ VERY fake news. | ||
| Ourdee |
the new-and-improved OFA, an organization intent on removing a lawfully-elected president from office and Sedition and Treason Sedition | Definition of Sedition by Merriam-Webster https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/seditio n Legal Definition of sedition. : the crime of creating a revolt, disturbance, or violence against lawful civil authority with the intent to cause its overthrow or destruction — compare criminal syndicalism, sabotage. Definition of treason 1 : the betrayal of a trust : treachery 2 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family Impeach OK, but this clown... I find his words and actions a kin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. | ||
| Aesquire |
Treason, and keep in mind I am not a lawyer, is betrayal to, collaboration with, the enemy, in time of war. The "in time of war" part is why John Kerry technically didn't commit treason. There was no declaration of war in Vietnam. So his collaboration with the enemy, his propaganda efforts for the enemy, and his lies for the enemy, didn't qualify that traitor for the death penalty. Technically. Pity. But Barry & Soros could certainly be convicted of sedition. There is a long standing tradition in the U.S. that we don't prosecute ex-presidents for their crimes. It's for the same reason professional spies don't attack families. ( although seducing the other's wife has a long tradition ) It's to prevent the escalation made famous in history as seen in third world dictatorships and the English Royal Family. Where each winner of the coup kills off his rivals from the previous coup. It's smart to do so short term, but almost always backfires long term, since it can be hard to kill every one of the relatives of your former rivals, and every one of their supporter's families, etc. It's a 200+ year tradition here not to prosecute for that reason. It's obvious that the last 2 Democrat Presidents have had no problem bad mouthing their predecessors, in violation of classic good taste, but Bill and Barry didn't try to put the Bush family in prison. Or kill off the entire line, as other countries have done. So it's unlikely in the extreme that Trump will ever have Obama prosecuted for any of his many crimes. Ditto Hillary. The reason is the same. When Trump peacefully and graciously leaves office after a fair & free election, he doesn't want the next President to line him up against the wall and shoot him. My current bet for 2020 D candidates are Elizabeth Warren and for her VP, Rachel Dolezal. They would line up their enemies and have them shot. ( Rachel changed her name to Nkechi Amare Diallo.... And may be the only person to be victimized by blacks, whites, and sane people ) http://www.theroot.com/this-rachel-dolezal-tea-abo ut-the-oppression-of-darth-b-1792903639 |
