G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board » President Trump » Archive 2016 - 2018 » Archive through February 02, 2017 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Whisperstealth
Posted on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 11:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It's censor, not censer.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Wednesday, February 01, 2017 - 11:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I agree with FB that it sure seems like something very sinister is in play with all the protests and the media chorus of "illegitimate", and "chaos". "Protesters" in the street using a bullhorn telling folks they should start killing people. Malcontents at universities and colleges all over the nation waging violence and being disruptive to prevent people from sharing their ideas. And the universities allow it to happen. Professors join the "protest." We've had our supposed "objective" news media caught colluding and aiding HRC and the DNC, and multiple cases of blatant false reporting aimed to portray Trump as a racist or some other nefarious charge.

Yeah, it's a coup. The acting AG was a small actor, and she may have been acting according to her conscience. I'll give her the benefit of doubt on that.

The coup It is failing.

George Soros and friends may well end up in prison in the end.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Example:

https://news.grabien.com/story-masked-protesters-s tarting-fires-tearing-down-fences-outside-1

"Protesters" wearing masks. These are likely professional agitators being paid to make trouble.

No police. They let the fire burn.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xdigitalx
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Torque, my point was... they would be firing upon actual United States land... and would allow for better/faster/stronger more defined obliteration of them. also ... if we lay claim to a section of land.. as part of the USA, they won't need to jump on plane. We would certainly find out pretty quick who our real allies were. So many mental fuses would be blown...

eh... might make a good movie with some better thought...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 02:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't think a U.S. territorial claim in the middle east would be anything except a hate magnet.

I do have suggestions on how to handle the problem, and I admit they involve decapitation strikes on Iran, freeing the Iranian people, telling the UN to go monitor the new elections, and giving the Kurdish part of Iran to the Kurds.

Of course if you want to go all the way to fix the problem you have to break the back of OPEC. We can do that, but it would be smart to do it in cooperation with Russia, not in opposition.

The downside of my approach is Saudi Arabia would collapse, violently. I suppose we could ship Alfau & some of the guns he's talking about to Arabia. He's sure to have a better plan.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 08:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Interesting "peaceful protests" by the Democrats . . . . Coup? . . .who knows but this is showing signs of getting ugly.































Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pwnzor
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 08:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

To me, this guy embodies the entire spirit of the "protest"...



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 08:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I sure hope Trump calls out all the weasels in the House who are now waffling on repealing the disaster known as Obamacare.

They should all be tarred and feathered and tossed into the Potomac.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-0 2-01/republicans-rebrand-obamacare-strategy-from-r epeal-to-repair
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 10:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/02/02/car-plows -protesters-milo-berkeley-riots/

Funny headline. It should read "fleeing deadly assault when attacked by fascist paid thugs, barely escapes with lives."

So... Berkeley was attacked by Soros paid monsters.

Where they wanted to stop the free speech of a gay man who loves black men because he's racist. And homophobic. And sexist. ( honesty is sexist I suppose )

I think Milo is a bit sexist. Not like Barry who never played golf with a female while president. Or Bill with multiple charges of rape. Or Anthony who sent nude pictures of himself to under age girl. ( & is soooo lucky I'm not her father. Not that I want to go to prison for disassembly of Hillary's bff's beard. )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 10:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

By their enemies you will know them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 10:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake, the tar would pollute the river. Almost as bad as Republican congressmen. Besides, overland on a rail is traditional.

I'm waiting for the "mass shooting" when some human is attacked by a Soros/Clinton mob and defend themselves. Riot assault calls for the last man standing defense.

I expect calls to end civil rights especially the first & second amendment rights..... but that's common from the left.

I also expect a new thread ; ) Best 4x4 for crowd surfing?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 10:55 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I wonder if they chanted "peaceful protest" like they did in Portland when they coldcocked a Trump supporter? I don't blame the driver of that car one bit. Some legislators are working to protect people caught in such a situation... How a mother-in-law inspired a bill to protect drivers who accidentally run over protesters

quote:

House Bill 1203 was sponsored by state Rep. Keith Kempenich, the owner of a trucking company. It would extend protections for drivers who accidentally injure or kill a person obstructing traffic on a public road or highway


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 11:19 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 11:39 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Ex-Obama Official Suggests ‘Military Coup’ Against Trump
By Aaron Klein, Breitbart News - 02/02/2017

In a blog post for Foreign Policy magazine, Rosa Brooks, a former Obama administration official, outlined four ways to “get rid” of President Trump, including declaring him mentally unfit for command or carrying out a military coup.
Brooks is a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation, which is funded by billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. She served from 2009-2011 as Counselor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and served as a senior adviser at Obama’s State Department.

Brooks listed four ways to get rid of [the] president:


quote:

1) Elect him out of office after his four-year term. “But after such a catastrophic first week, four years seems like a long time to wait,” she wrote.
2) Impeachment. However, she lamented, “impeachments take time: months, if not longer — even with an enthusiastic Congress. And when you have a lunatic controlling the nuclear codes, even a few months seems like a perilously long time to wait.”
3) Utilizing a claim of mental instability to invoke the 25th Amendment of the Constitution, which sets the path for the commander-in-chief’s removal if the “president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”
4) A military coup. She writes: “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”




Source, more: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/02 /ex-obama-official-suggests-military-coup-trump/


^ This is an eye-opening piece, with many hot-linked citations for further research.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 11:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Image source: https://twitter.com/Snoozemayne/status/82713890160 5285888/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 11:53 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm beginning to wonder if we are seeing the start of a civil war. It kind of reminds me of BO ignoring ISIS as they rose to power, claiming them to be the JV team, and ignoring the threats. How long are we supposed to ignore the terrorism being committed by the progressives in our country? At what point do we start to treat them as the terrorists that they are?

4) A military coup. She writes: “The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”

That speaks to the ivory tower mentality of these idiots. The military, by and large, are thrilled to have Trump as CIC, instead of Hillary or BO.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Janet Napolitano



Janet Ann Napolitano...is an American politician, lawyer, and university administrator who served as the 21st Governor of Arizona from 2003 to 2009 and United States Secretary of Homeland Security from 2009 to 2013, under President Barack Obama. She has been president of the University of California system since September 2013... [emphasis mine - FB]

...On January 11, 2008, Napolitano endorsed then Illinois Senator Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee for president.

...On December 1, 2008, Barack Obama introduced Napolitano as his nominee for United States Secretary of Homeland Security.

...Napolitano was the subject of controversy after the release of a Department of Homeland Security threat assessment report that was seen as derogatory towards armed forces veterans. The report focused on potential threats from the radical right.

...Napolitano announced she would leave her post as Secretary of Homeland Security at the end of August 2013 to become president of the University of California system.[64][65] She was appointed the 20th president of the University of California by the UC Board of Regents on July 18, 2013, and began her tenure as president on September 30, 2013.


Napolitano campaigning for Hillary Clinton in Phoenix, Arizona on October 30, 2016.
Photo attribution: By Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America - Janet Napolitano, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=52 683715



Source, more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm beginning to wonder if we are seeing the start of a civil war.

The civil war began in earnest a little over eight years ago, on January 20, 2009...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Time for authorities to deploy sleeping gas to stop and apprehend the anarchists and vandals breaking the law.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Brooks is a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation, which is funded by billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations.


quote:

New America, formerly the New America Foundation, is a non-partisan think tank in the United States. It focuses on a range of public policy issues, including national security studies, technology, asset building, health, gender, energy, education, and the economy. The organization is based in Washington, D.C., with additional offices in New York City.

Google's Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt, is the chairman of the foundation's board of directors. [emphasis mine - FB]



Source, more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_America_(organization)

(Message edited by fb1 on February 02, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

One of the pix Court posted above:



I can't quite make out the name of the organization who produced the "SMASH" sign in the window (and who likely hired the "protesters"). It'd be interesting to know who funds this organization...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Macbuell
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Apparently stopping fascism means free coffee for everyone.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.pslweb.org/

Party for Socialism & Liberation.

https://www.liberationnews.org/

They claim not to be related to the CIA plot to hurt Trump & America, or the Democrat Party anti-american movement. So, since these people lie as a matter of religious fervor, you can bet it's Soros.

It's like living in a bad riddle. "if Australians always lie....."

Oddly, it makes things simple for honest men.

I consider Donald to be "full of crap". This is in stark contrast to Barry who was fundamentally, religiously, dishonest.

I haven't read Donald's autobiography.

I did read both of Barry's ghost written ones. ( the word choice is nothing like Obama's normal usage, but identical to the communist/anarchist murderer who both babysat Obama's children and claims to have written the biography ) You expect an autobiography to be biased. Only truly great men, like Drew Carey dare write of their failures. Barry's is full of imaginary arguments that he won, brilliantly, and people he made up to be foils for his genius.

It is indeed a sad day when you can confidently say that CNN or NBC are as undeserving of trust as Pravda or Micheal Moore.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Didn't FourBucks just promise to hire 10,000 refugee workers?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 12:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

At least Trump has accomplishments worthy of a biography before being elected POTUS. That other one... Not so much.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Macbuell
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 01:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The left has really come unhinged. If it wasn't so scary to witness, it would be really sad and pathetic.

Imagine if conservative / republican supporters behaved this way after losing an election.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 02:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Didn't FourBucks just promise to hire 10,000 refugee workers?


quote:

Starbucks says it will hire 10,000 refugees over the next 5 years in response to Trump's travel ban
Josh Boak, Associated Press - 01/29/2017

WASHINGTON (AP) — Starbucks says it will hire 10,000 refugees over the next five years, a response to President Donald Trump's indefinite suspension of Syrian refugees and temporary travel bans that apply to six other...nations.



Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-starbucks-to-hir e-10000-refugees-over-next-5-years-2017-1



Apparently the Party for Socialism & Liberation didn't get the memo...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 02:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

So what are the rules when it is or isn't it OK cor a corporation to do things that helps the brand and protects the company and stockholders, but that may not be the best for the country?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017 - 03:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

...well if ICE and INS get the backing/funding/support they need, the immigrants won't be in the country legally to begin with. Which will produce two results:

1. Starbucks has just painted a target upon themselves because they are hiring illegals as a form of "protest"

2. There simply won't be anyone of "immigrant" status for them to hire, because all "immigrants" will have gone through proper channels and have become US citizens as required by the US Government.

Either way...the problem appears to be solved. Yes?
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration