G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Archive through March 29, 2005 » Naked bike testing - XB12s 7th out of 8 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hkwan
Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 03:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.canyonchasers.net/reference/images/2005triplevsNakeds.pdf
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Uwgriz
Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 04:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Personally I don't really care much about the "shootouts" that the bike mags always do (my bike is the best bike for me), but just for fun:

On their "scale"
Power - 5 out of 8 bikes get perfect scores
Handling - 6 out of 8 bikes get perfect scores
Usability - 5 out of 8 bikes get perfect scores
Fun - 4 out of 8 bikes get perfect scores
Value - 1 out of 8 bikes got perfect score

So for 4 out of 5 categories, at least half of the bikes received perfect scores. Doesn't seem to me like that kind of scoring is going to help you discern anything. So without a good scoring system, it just seems like a battle of opinions to me and you know what they say about those...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johncr250
Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 08:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think the Buell is the best looking bike in the comparision by far.

It always comes back to the same thing with the Buell, the motor. The XB gives up almost 50hp to some of those bikes. No wonder the Buell came in next to last.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

2dflyer
Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 11:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The XB gives up almost 50hp to some of those bikes. No wonder the Buell came in next to last.

Too bad some people let the spec sheets do the talkin instead of the seat of the pants. If they'd just ride they'd figure out you can't run }a bike on the street at 13K RPM where those bikes are making all their HP.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 - 01:53 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"My favorite was easily the Brutale - It's just the revs and the way it sounds" Paul Harrison.

It's comments like this combined with their acknowledgment of the fact that the Buell is a superior handling bike (even with the stock tires mind you : )) to ALL the other bikes in the comparison that leads me to doubt the riders/writers credibility and subjectiveness. I could care less about the points they awarded, but the only thing they had to say that was bad about the Buell was the engine. I think they didn't spend enough time with it myself. They keep saying that other bikes had more grunt down low, then print numbers that disagree... I'm not so sure they know what "down low" is anymore.

Engines are indeed a good thing, but I'm pretty sure that for the price of the more expensive bikes in the comparison you could have Aaron make you a MUCH faster toy. MUCH faster. And it would still handle better. That's something you really can't do much about...

Thank you Erik : ).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Geoffg
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 - 06:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Now, I'd kinda like a Brutale myself...

However, back here in the real world, I got what I thought was the best bike I could afford, an 03 Buell.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sleeper_777
Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 - 11:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I give the magazine a 1 out of 10 based on my findings that are factual opinion. Read MCN instead, no advertising dollars and subjective.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rocketman
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 07:47 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just to clarify.....


MCN UK said

"The Buell's reputation for handling like a superbike and steering like a 250GP bike is well deserved. Scratching on the handling circuit at Bruntingthorpe Proving Ground in Leicestershire, it doesn't take long to realise that out of the box, the Lightning out-handles all the bikes here. But that's not all - if you could get an R1 to brake, steer and feel as solid mid-corner as the Buell, you could give it to Rossi to play with.
Through really tight stuff it can even hang with the Brutale, flicking from bend to bend like a supermono. But once the road opens up it doesn't have the power to keep up, the revs run out abruptly and the rev-limiter cuts in too soon. If the Buell had more go it would be sensational."

In the verdit MCN said

"The incredible handling of the Buell took us by surprise, too. You'd never guess when pootling around town with its Harley-derived engine throbbing beneath you that the Lightning will delicately dance its way around a race track with more poise and stability than any current batch of supersport 600s can muster. Incredible."




Please let's not knock the British press until you've read the whole story.

Rocket
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alf1929
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 08:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

One question about this article:

The raw performance data [1/4 mi, 0-60, even hp ratings) appears to be on the low side when compared to tests in US rags. For instance, the XB12 is rated at 95hp. In the US, it is what? 103 or 105 crank, 85 rwhp. The 1/4 mi for the Buell is 12.2s in the article. I've seen it stated to be around 11.3, 11.5 sec. Ditto for the Z1000: 1/4 mi - 11.5 sec, here 10.7 to 10.9 sec (below 11 sec usually). Not that it matters much, just curious!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1badbuell
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 09:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think in last month's Motorcyclist mag...their long term Brutale was only clocking 20mpg...so out of the twisties and on to the straights...I'll pass him while he's fueling back up
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rocketman
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 02:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There's a lot of truth in the fuel race!

Last year MCN UK set a motorway, dual carriageway and twisty road course, 300 miles long if I remember correctly, and pitched a Goldwing against an R1. The Wing won by about 10 minutes taking a fast but steady pace. The R1 had its neck wrung all the way between fuel stops!

But what if we introduce a boredom meter LOL

Rocket
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 02:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Well, I for one, think that the test was credible. I think it's amazing that a Buell was even considered for a comparison with those bikes. The fact that it even beat one, the Japanese bike no less, is a victory in it's own right.

Buells are great, innovative, fun motorcycles, but nothing will make up for the fact that they're powered by an engine designed in 1957.

I don't feel bad the Buell didn't finish better; I'm overjoyed that it was taken seriously.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 03:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Interesting... I don't see the XB engine as being designed in 1957 at all. Did you know that there IS actually a crank breather in it? A very neat one too.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 04:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Of course the engine is not identical to the original XL released in 1957, but it still uses the antiquidated knife and fork rods, indiviudal cams for each valve, and the pushrods and huge rockers. The layout and configuration of the engine hasn't changed significantly in almost 50 years. I never said this was a bad thing, just stating the obvious.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 04:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Gotcha...

The rev limit on our bikes is defined by the chosen stroke length though, so none of those things are the limiting factor in our application. They're good for about 8500 or so RPM from what I hear. Quad cam in our application is also a good thing... It helps to reduce valve train flex because everything is in a line wrt the push rod. The valve train on the twin cams cause the push rod to wobble due to it not being lined up. Again though, it's the stroke length that limits the RPM in that application as well, so it's really not an issue.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sleeper_777
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 05:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I prefer MCN over any motorcycle magazine with paid advertising. As for reviews of bikes, none of them persuade me to buy (or not buy) certain bikes. I go ride what I'm interested in and if it fits me, makes me feel comfortable and confident, then it's a good bike for me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 05:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

And that's where it's at... Don't ride spec sheets : ).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buells Rule!
(Dyna in disguise)

Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 05:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The raw performance data [1/4 mi, 0-60, even hp ratings) appears to be on the low side when compared to tests in US rags. For instance, the XB12 is rated at 95hp. In the US, it is what? 103 or 105 crank, 85 rwhp. The 1/4 mi for the Buell is 12.2s in the article. I've seen it stated to be around 11.3, 11.5 sec. Ditto for the Z1000: 1/4 mi - 11.5 sec, here 10.7 to 10.9 sec (below 11 sec usually). Not that it matters much, just curious!

From what I have seen over the years it appears as if the UK magazines actually are a lot closer to what a real rider will get in the 1/4 mile, not some 110 lb pro racer. 12.2 for the XB is very credible for what most folks will ever get with a stock bike, the 11.2's you have seen are fantasy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Friday, March 25, 2005 - 06:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

As far as I'm concerned it's just like dyno's... I don't look at the number, I look at the curve. If the test was done with the same rider then it's all good, but variance will still show up. To me, I'd look at many sources and average them.

This specific subject is moot to me anyway, I could care less about drag races. Just MO though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Brucelee
Posted on Saturday, March 26, 2005 - 09:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think this says it all!


"Scratching on the handling circuit at Bruntingthorpe Proving Ground in Leicestershire, it doesn't take long to realise that out of the box, the Lightning out-handles all the bikes here. But that's not all - if you could get an R1 to brake, steer and feel as solid mid-corner as the Buell, you could give it to Rossi to play with."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rocketsprink
Posted on Saturday, March 26, 2005 - 10:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What it all boils down to is ride what you like and like what you ride. Who really gives a Rat's @ss what others have to say. Not everyone likes what I like. I respect their opinions, but doesn't mean I have to accept them!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cataract2
Posted on Saturday, March 26, 2005 - 11:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

From what I have seen over the years it appears as if the UK magazines actually are a lot closer to what a real rider will get in the 1/4 mile, not some 110 lb pro racer. 12.2 for the XB is very credible for what most folks will ever get with a stock bike, the 11.2's you have seen are fantasy.

That or 11.2 would be what you get with wheely bars and leaving the line balls to the wall by dropping the clutch. But hey, who here would/could do that without breaking loose right? Besides, if that were the case my FZR would be 11.5 in the 1/4. Reality, I can muster about 12.9-13.4 on it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Yeahcmon
Posted on Saturday, March 26, 2005 - 03:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"the revs run out to quickly" DO THEY EVEN KNOW WHAT A PUSHROD IS????????????
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rocketman
Posted on Sunday, March 27, 2005 - 06:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yeah, it's a rod that pushes

Rocket
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

New12r
Posted on Monday, March 28, 2005 - 12:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I managed a 11.7 on a Teresi Drag Dyno, With lots of launch revvs and clutchless shifting. I know I could not have done that on the real strip, I would be on my back and the bike probably on top of me.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration