G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board Archives » Archive 0211 (November 2002) » The United States of Europe? » Archive through November 01, 2002

« Previous Next »

Author Message   Blacksix Posted on Thursday, October 31, 2002 - 11:07 pm:        Someone said "New World Order"? Washington is the center of the New World Order There's a fruit-bat for you.   Rudebike Posted on Thursday, October 31, 2002 - 11:18 pm:        I think the bible is very clear on end times and the facts of true world order and control. I tend to stay away from secret society stuff. The bible is clear about: 1. Spritual authorities in earthly places that control regions and countries. These rulers are sometimes referred to as "princes". The point is that we as mere men do not control our world. 2. Christ came to overthrow the head of those authorites, the devil. A fallen, but powerful being of matchless ability this side of heaven. 3. Most folks blow off stuff like I have just written, but it is there to consider.   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 09:05 am:        Rude . . . .could be that you limit the amount of giggling in your life . . . . me, I try to increase it in mine, and try not to confuse the sound of laughter in any form with anything else . . . I'd suggest that you do the same, but I don't know you well enough to do so, so I won't You abviously have a different viewpoint . . . great . . . . blow you a kiss? likely not, sir . . . and, can you explain what that comment has to do with the topic of a world organization? ya lost me there as for discrediting what you wrote, I have no interest in doing so . . . .I merely asked for data backing up your post . . . as a matter of fact, I HAVE done some research on the web on this topic . . . and, like most every topic, this one has more evidence, pro and con, than you, excuse me, than I could shake a stick at . . . . while I use the web as a start of meaningful research, basing my decisions and opions soely on web-based data would be like getting all my news from the local TV station . . .limiting, at best, I think   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 09:08 am:        Rude . . . . swank leftie? hmmmm . . . never been called that before . . . . I'll have to do some net-based research, and see what it is you're tying to say   Att Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 09:37 am:        A one Govt. world !!! Here are the recent events from this week in the UK, IRA refuse to hand in thier weapons and blame the UK government and it`s dishonesty, the peace process is in the balance....but this event has only been reported on inside pages of the newspapers and has not had any headline status anyplace in the UK.....keeping it quiet then.....The French president/prime minister has snubbed our PM and abandoned a previously arranged meeting, our PM is getting more and more pissed off with the froggy bastards and as for the Germans, well nuff said about them bastards.......United states of Europe....some fuckin hope of that sunshine !!! we can`t even agree when to have the meetings, let alone agree at the meetings.......ROTFLMAO.   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 09:39 am:        Att . . .careful . . .you could join me in the swank leftie club, if you're not careful (still trying to figure out what that means, exactly, but I doubt if it's a compliment)   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 11:30 am:        Bomber, "Swank lefty"...you wear it well. ATT, Count your blessings. Do you really want some fish breathed Dutchman with wooden shoes to put his oily arm around you and call you "brother"? I didn't think so.   Cjmblast Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 11:45 am:        Bomber, it's not looking much like a compliment to me either, my friend !! Just guessing, since I don't know what it means either ! CJM   Mikej Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 11:51 am:        Swank: suave, debonair, dashing, swagger, showoff. Leftist: Left leaning, left winger, liberal. Either someone's confused, sarcastic, or is just yanking your chain. Either that or he's referring to your left-turn only bike racing and the good looking bike you rode at the time. I'd just call it a friendly needle or jab and come up with something equally confusing. That would be the Bee's Knees, wouldn't it?   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 12:12 pm:        Oh brother...   Mikej Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 12:25 pm:        Okay RudeB, Give us a definition then?   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 12:45 pm:        I believe, after careful consideration, that Rude was attempting to comment on my politics, about which he knows little due entirely to his lack of exposure to them, and my sexual preferences, about whcih he knows nothing . . . . . but, since he's silent on the topic, it remains a mystery . . .not one, however, that deserves a great deal more thought   Mikej Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 12:58 pm:        Ah, but sometimes delving into these little mysteries provides for some of our greatest discoveries and exposures. For instance, why is there air, and what happens if we modify that air, and what happens if we inject this modified air into a compression chamber as part of an assemblage of gears and components, and what if said gas/air injected assemblage were to be propelled along a defined course, could one then speculate that a maximum terminal speed of said assemblage would approach 208mph or beyond? See, the little thoughts sometimes leads one to new and bigger thoughts. I scare myself sometimes.   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 01:04 pm:        we ain't skeered, Mike . . . we LIKE that kinda thing here er, then I guess I should say that my left-turn-only racers were really, I mean really ratty lookin . . . .. . as was I mysteries are most definately worth examining, you bet!   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 03:01 pm:        You guys are like a comedy team. Who's the straight guy? Giggles, What I was commenting on was the character of your posts. You come across like a precocious little girl, that's all. Please, guys don't spend too much time on this.   Hans Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 03:21 pm:        Rudebike, you made a very false suggestion: "Do you really want some fish breathed Dutchman with wooden shoes to put his oily arm around you and call you "brother"" For our brethren we use at least both arms !! Hans   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 03:30 pm:        HAH! Hans, I feel ambarrassed now that a real Netherlander has seen my post. You are very gracious, and I'm sure your arms aren't oily or your shoes wooden. Well played my friend.   Bomber Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 03:59 pm:        Rude thanks for clearing that up . . . I'll pitch my voice lower in the future . . .   Hans Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 05:29 pm:        Rudebike, to be honest, you would be surprised how smoothly you can shift with wooden shoes and the rear brake is in fact developed for them. And how fishy breath works out on the OPPOSITE sex? Hans   Cjmblast Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 05:33 pm:        Giggles !!! CJM   Att Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 06:23 pm:        Do you really want some fish breathed Dutchman with wooden shoes to put his oily arm around you and call you "brother"" Actually met some real nice Dutch on my French camping holiday this year, I admired the fact that they do not have a class system, and I would rather they put thier arm around me that some cigar smoking lying english politician.....I consider the Dutch to be some of the most mentally stable beings in the whole world, I mean if your picture was taken every 15 seconds whilst you were driving or riding and you were charged some serious spondoolie for the privelige, then you would have to be a very calm and grounded individual.....I love the Dutch, and they do make some rather splendid videos !   Nevco1 Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 06:50 pm:        I love the Dutch, and they do make some rather splendid videos ! ATT... I do believe you are in for some serious thrashing from Rudebike and perhaps a few more. If this refers to what my Healthy American Male Mind thinks it does, you just intimidated the "God Squad." ROTFLMAO...   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:21 pm:        I know ATT, and he knows me. No need to thrash. What's the God squad? Whether you have a Healthy American Male Mind is not for you say. I will make that judgement.   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:32 pm:        Nevco1 And what does God have to do with anything in ATT's post? And why did you think his post was intimidating? Are you "ROTFLMAO..." because you have no clue what you are reading? Or do you see little bunny rabbits on the screen? I gotta tell ya most of the posting that I see on this board is not very well thought out. Here is another example. Bomber, I feel bad for you. None of your retorts are even mildly amusing...they are weak! Worse, they are not relevant. It's not the pitch of voice that is conveyed in your typed words, it's the character of your responses. You do come across like a little girl. What can I say? What I wouldn't give for some SacBORG chat chowder right now...sheesh!   Nevco1 Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:33 pm:        Rude... Not to worry about my mind. Was just referring to the over abundance of Dutch porn movies. Having lived in CA for all but the last three years of my adult life, your biblical references triggered visions of an ensuing lecture. Concerning the "God Squad", it is a a long time twist on the Old "Mod Squad" TV series and contemporary overzealous religious types. I am more than confident that you have heard the phrase before. No insult intended. Bill   Att Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:41 pm:        Who is this GOD you speak of......would he be related to that Jesus dude that so many refer to and the bestseller he wrote called the elbib........I don`t do God, if you believe in him you gotta believe in the Devil, and the Devil aint tough enough in my book.......   Nevco1 Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:45 pm:        Rude... Point #2. I know Bomber personally. You apparently don't. Thus, compliments of the electronic media, two folks that have a way of expressing similar concerns differently are reduced to whatever. (Sorry, Char. Am not using your name in vain. LOL) Do yourself a favor and relax and enjoy the humor/spirit of the postings. Trust me, there are no world issues being settled here, but it is a great place to test theory. Not to mention, we all (should) undergo a life long learning process and if you can't express yourself and appreciate the opinions of others...You get my drift. Have a great weekend! Bill   Nevco1 Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 07:49 pm:        ATT... Too funny!!! Apologize if I stepped on your relationship with Rudebike. I just related the two posts and came up with WWIII or at least the next Crusade. Best regards, Bill   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 08:14 pm:        Nevco1, I have heard the phrase used years ago when there was radio show with a hip preacher called the God Squad. What it's relevance is here is not clear, but then again that's a matter of your mind, not mine. I'm not insulted, I'm mildy amused.   Rudebike Posted on Friday, November 01, 2002 - 08:24 pm:        Nevco1, You have changed my life...thank you...sniff.