| Author |
Message |
    
Microchop
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 - 03:15 pm: | 
|
Doll Clothing. |
Microchop
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 - 03:16 pm: |
|
And why is medical equipment exempted?
There's an industry that can afford the testing. |
P_squared
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 - 03:26 pm: |
|
This just plain flat out S U C K S!
I hope you & your wife can find an exemption/way around this.
Can't wait 'til I see your story in the news, and the other small businesses like you, all 'cuz the Federales our "Protecting the children." |
Alchemy
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 - 08:52 pm: |
|
I would think very carefully about any envy of medical device makers when it comes to costly regulation and requirements. |
Swampy
| | Posted on Thursday, December 11, 2008 - 04:26 pm: |
|
Payola, protection from the regulators. |
Hootowl
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - 10:10 am: |
|
There may be exemptions for some materials built in to the law, and there is a group trying to get certain materials specifically exempted, as the organization that will oversee enforcement has not issued any rules yet.
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Dec24/0,4670,Tain tedToys,00.html
You can tell it's an AP article because the first thing they do is blame Bush for "imposing" the law, not the Democrat that wrote it, or the Democrat controlled body that passed it. Shameful yet predictable. |
Court
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - 10:13 am: |
|
The same body that exempted executive compensation from the auto industry "loans" . . . ya gotta love them . . . they picked up the slack where George Carlin left off. |
Froggy
| | Posted on Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - 01:09 pm: |
|
I was just reading this : http://consumerist.com/5117450/new-toy-safety-rule -has-collateral-damage-handmade-toy-manufacturers
Ft_btrd perhaps you could label the clothing as for dolls or something. This really blows, I hope the ammend the law. |
|
