G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile Ads by Motorcycle.comMotorcycle InsuranceMotorcycle PartsMotorcycle Helmets Motorcycle Tires Buell Motorcycles

Author Message   Outdoors Posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 - 02:41 pm:        So I'm finally committing to upgrading my shock to a Works or Penske and I'm wonder if there is any real advantage to one length or the other, mounts, etc? My 2000 M2 has the factory 16.5 incher but if there is any advantage to the shorter shock then I would pick up a later mount. The aftermarket shocks are a BIG purchase so I want to get what works best. If no advantage then I'l order the longer version and not change my mount. I use my bike short, sporting rides and several day tours. No track time or cross country rides. I sometimes carry one of my kids on shorter rides. Thanks.   Onebadx1 Posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 - 06:47 pm:        I went with the longer 16.5" Works from Al @ American Sport Bike only because that's what I had on the bike... Its awesome! (Message edited by onebadx1 on May 01, 2011)   Cyclonemick Posted on Monday, May 02, 2011 - 01:19 pm:        I also have a 2000 M2,.when I bought my penske it was the short shock so a buddy who worked for a stealership traded me my mount for the old one, love my shock! I think your good either way!

Add Your Message Here Post: -Color- Black Red Green Blue Yellow Purple Orange Cyan Gray White -Font- Arial Courier Symbol Times Verdana -Size- Smallest (-2) Small (-1) Normal Large (+1) Largest (+2) Username: Posting Information: This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here. Password: Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.) Enable HTML code in message Automatically activate URLs in message Action: