G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » Old School Buell » Archive through August 05, 2009 » Isolators re-visited » Archive through July 23, 2009 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sfmc_x1
Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 - 11:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

So most here are vaguely familiar with the DS isolator...

http://www.dragspecialties.com/fatbook/6/294/77257 84

Has anyone tried these from the same Parts Unlimited/Drag Specialties catalog?

http://www.dragspecialties.com/fatbook/6/294/77257 85

Isolator mount "limiter". Says for Buells, looks like a compact spin off the stenzel bar, but how do you secure it to the chassis?

http://www.dragspecialties.com/fatbook/6/294/77257 68

Heavy Duty Front Isolator... beefier mounting bracket, nothing descript on the quality of the rubber inside...

One if not both said you could apply to Buell/tubers in the paper catalog.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellistic
Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 - 12:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

BUELLers:

Anybody ever question the "PRICE" deference between BMC/Harley-Davidson parts, BMC parts, and Drag Specialties parts which have on BWBers been established to be the same part/parts ???
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ebutch
Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 - 04:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I prefer Buell iso,soft rubber nice ride on S2T.Too bad is there some-way to impregnate rubber with
Kevler fiber?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 - 09:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I bloody well do not believe this, PLEASE limit the posts to data to the List that Frank started!!!

We are trying to determine the magnitude of the problem.

and get a sense of the number of failures
take the grumbling else where, please post questions on another thread

again
Bike
milage
1st iso failed at milage
iso make
2nd iso failed at milage
iso make
mods, comments


PLEASE!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sportyeric
Posted on Sunday, July 19, 2009 - 04:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Cross posting a bit but its relevant to the data that Frank wants.
What I've alrady provided:
1995 S2
70000 miles
1st iso replaced as a set with failed rear iso at 60K, all Buell parts
2nd iso, the Buell part, failed at 1000 miles.
And here's the new data:
I've realized that I failed to install the washer between the hanger and the iso. Found it in the pile of left-over parts from the rebuild.
Currently installing the 79D, with all washers.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 09:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

For those of you that cannot open the file the information needed is as follows:

1. Year
2. Model
3. Total Miles
4. Riding Style (Easy, moderate, aggressive)
5. # Miles when original isolator failed
6. Type of isolator used to replace original
7. Number of miles between failures
8. Modification done to the bike (ie headwork, HRHS Bracket etc)
application/vnd.ms-excel
Isolator Data.xls (28.7 k)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Skntpig
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 09:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

1. 1997
2. S1
3. Approx 28K miles
4. Aggressive, former jap bike roadracer
5. Broke bolt whole out of head, bolt intact at around 24K miles. ISO looked fine, I might put it back in.
6. Barry softer version
7. No 2nd failure yet, although it looks like it is starting to crack on the bottom, so may be soon.
8. Forcewinder, KT pipe, stock top end when broken. NOW: welded front head where broken, NRHS bracket, shrink ported heads.

(Message edited by skntpig on July 20, 2009)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Psycrow
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 09:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

1. 2002
2. M2
3. 19800 miles
4. Moderate to Aggressive
5. 18800 miles
6. Buell OEM (L0501.2)
7. L0501.2 failed after 370 miles, replaced with Drag Specialties (DS243515) failed after 620 miles.
8. No mods other than Forcewinder and V&H slipon.

Psy
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Brinnutz
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 09:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

1. 2002
2. M2L
3. 15xxx miles
4. Moderate to Aggressive...Wheelies too.
5. 15xxx miles
6. Buell OEM (L0501.2)
7. Haven't installed yet.
8. Before the failure:
Forcewinder, Race header, D&D muffler, Crossroads bars...

FWIW my rears went bad at the same time.

(Message edited by brinnutz on July 20, 2009)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sfmc_x1
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 09:55 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

1. 2000
2. X1 Lightning
3. 26,000
4. Aggressive Back Road Rider/ "A" Group Track-Day Fast Guy.
5. Original Front Isolator Replaced @ 19K (inspected/Still in Usable Condition)
6. OEM Buell Replacement Available as of Summer 2008.
7. 3K (22K) and 2K (25.5K) Miles
8. NRHS Front Engine Mount Bracket and Hardware @ 19K Miles (New Works Shock, Front & Rear Iso's @ 25.5K Miles)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 01:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

All, thanks for the info so far. Please keep it coming. If you just want to send it to my email use f_skinner at yahoo dot com with ISOLATOR in the title.

When we have a good sample it will be sent on.

Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cyclonemick
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 03:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

00 Cyclone M2
Front Isolator failure ODO 49,706
Weekly commute,weekend aggresive carving (No Stunts)
75% solo rider
Replaced Iso with HD-79d Reamed out .045 to 1/2 inch.
X1 cams,Penske shock, jet kit,K&N,Stock Mount.
300 miles and counting with new Iso.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nortnlvr
Posted on Monday, July 20, 2009 - 06:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

02 M2L first front isolator failure Odometer reads 16,000 miles, happened 5 days ago. Commuter, I've done 2 wheelies, like to hit the corners,70% solo. 6'2" 230lbs. before beer. Have not replaced as I just talked to american sport bike and he told me there ain't anything good right now, but that Buell was working on a fix? this true?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 09:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Frank please post up the sheet when you are "done", thanks..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 10:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Oldog, with only 15 entires and only 4 having a problem it is not a large enough sample.

As someone that used to do testing for a living this small sample would be thrown out. Ao and Do (Availability and Dependability) are very important. I think I could guess the results.

I will give it another week and will wash my hands of it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 02:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Frank some of the "complainers" should be counted

Nastin 3 failures
GoingWindward 2 or 3 failures

I am sure that there have been others.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 02:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Right, I will not dig through threads to find the info. If I know Gowindward he is already working a solution for his bike. It is up to the people to give me the info.

Here is what is needed again:
1. Year
2. Model
3. Total Miles
4. Riding Style (Easy, moderate, aggressive)
5. # Miles when original isolator failed
6. Type of isolator used to replace original
7. Number of miles between failures
8. Modification done to the bike (ie headwork, HRHS Bracket etc)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gowindward
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 02:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Hey...I'm not a complainer!!!!

I do not believe mine are valid data points.

On the S3T I will admit that I have exceeded design load capacity of the bike, not by much, but still exceeded the design limits. I have also done "experimental" (the brace/strut) fixes. I also know the first owners of the bike EXCEEDED design load limits too.


I pity the poor engineer at Buell that gets this turd dropped on his desk because the data points are all over the place, and very little if any control points.

On the S2...well it was a 13 year old rubber part....Makes you say Oh Crap! and replace it.

Beside trading the bike in for Megan Fox, which I think was a fake offer, I'm fixing it up with aftermarket parts and will be out touring again. I will also be packing just a wee bit lighter.

(Message edited by gowindward on July 21, 2009)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 03:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I pity the poor engineer at Buell that gets this turd dropped on his desk because the data points are all over the place, and very little if any control points.

BINGO, and we have a winner!!!!

Maybe something will come of it and maybe not. It does not matter to me but I really would like to get my hands on a tuber that is shredding a front isolator every 500 miles.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellistic
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 03:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Questions not asked:

Do you have a TIE BAR from the front motor mount to the frame ???

Do you have the L0504.9L and L0505.9L rear isolators installed ???
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

>>>I pity the poor engineer at Buell that gets this turd dropped on his desk because the data points are all over the place, and very little if any control points.


Independent testing of a wide range of options is under way. Any data, relevant or not, as long as it is accompanied by the explanations discussed might be helpful.

I think the concern is real. But solid data is a bit sketchy, hence the independent testing.

Seems like a solvable sort of thing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellistic
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 04:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

The way it used to be: The engineer designed it, was given to the R&D people whom could not break it, and finally to the BUELL rider whom found the flaws !!!

Since the BUELL rider does not know anything, there is no problem unless someone is KILLED, which then means the fix is "ASAP" !!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 05:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Sorry Loren, I did not mean to lump you in with the "complainers" I apologise I should not have refered to any one as a "complainer" the frustration some have vented was understandable,

Frank If you think it will make a difference in the results I will dig through the threads and try to list the failures, from the accounts.

BTW my bike was not over loaded, nor seriously abused, and two isos failed,
I still have them if the Buell guys want them for post mortem.

Loren one last thought what safety factor is applied, are you saying that you grossly overloaded your bike?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gowindward
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 06:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Jim, bike was overload by maybe 25 to 30 lbs. This last trip I weighed everything being packed on the bike, myself and Mb in riding gear, and checked the owners manual just to be sure I wasn't pushing it real bad.

Not much safety factor from my view, but it is a performance motorcycle and not a bulldozer.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 06:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)


quote:

The way it used to be: The engineer designed it, was given to the R&D people whom could not break it, and finally to the BUELL rider whom found the flaws !!!

Since the BUELL rider does not know anything, there is no problem unless someone is KILLED, which then means the fix is "ASAP" !!!




Might make a good campfire story but it's a long way from the way things really work.


>>>Olddog: If you want to package them up and send them to me, with as detailed as explanation of their history as you can recall (essentially the stuff in the spreadsheet)I'd be happy to take a look at them.

Court
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

F_skinner
Posted on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 - 08:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

application/vnd.ms-excel
Isolator Data.xls (31.2 k)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Riviera
Posted on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 - 08:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

2001 S3T
12,000 miles
Easy to Moderate riding style
Original, undamaged front isolator still in place
K&N ham can/V&H muff/Race ECM from new
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fast1075
Posted on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 - 12:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

The real world is the best TTD lab...I used to do some of that back in the day when I worked for Big Red.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kyrocket
Posted on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 - 02:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I've been reading both threads now with interest and starting to get mildly concerned. I replaced my front iso with the one from American Sport Bike simply because I had the motor out and it was easy to get to. The original has 24,450 miles and no visible signs of wear. The bike is only slightly modded, never been overloaded and has always had both wheels on the ground which is why the stocker probably lasted so long but I changed it anyway, guess I'll just keep an eye out and check it every so often, after I get a replacement starter that is.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ebutch
Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2009 - 11:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

(1)1996 (2)S2T (3)123,285 miles (4)fast hard no show off.(5)22,000 each(6)III,16207 Buell,II,2803(7) 22,000 (8)none (1)1999(2)S3(3)68,000(4)hard no show off(5)62,000(6)16396-99y,62,000,Drag DS243515,4,000(8)none S2T is on 5th iso newest iso 0ut of spair frame # 16207 real smooth ride

(Message edited by ebutch on July 23, 2009)
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration