G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » Old School Buell » Archive through March 27, 2009 » 4 X 4 Engine « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

186bigtwin
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 01:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Anyone know if an S&S 100" engine will fit in a tuber. I read somewhere it will. I've seen 88 inchers and they haul ass, I think the 100" engine is about 3/8" taller than stock, could be made to have 150HP ( all motor )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Preybird1
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 01:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I have heard from nrhs themselves that 100" will fit.
here is the link http://www.nrhsperformance.com/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Phelan
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 02:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

An 88 or 90" motor can be made to run those kind of numbers too, but you have to get a bit exotic. You have to get a little exotic with the 100" to make that kind of power though, too. I personally would rather build an exotic 90" and keep the short stroke myself, plus the 100" motor in a tuber is marginal fit at best. Aaron at NRHS had to do something with the isolators/mounts IIRC to get his 100" bonne motor to fit in the S2 frame. The good news? If you ever did want to put a taller motor in a tuber, the S2 would be the easiest do so, because you could just machine some taller sideplates so that the isolators rest lower to accomodate the extra height.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Firemanjim
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 02:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It is very doable. 100" S&S in Bonneville bike.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Limitedx1
Posted on Monday, March 16, 2009 - 03:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

save the custom stuff and just build a 90" sporty motor
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

186bigtwin
Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 04:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Does anyone on this site have a 88" or 90" motor in a tuber? I have one in an XL it stomps, ( 116rwhp, 105 ft lbs) Wonder how wheelie prone one would be in a Buell?
(shorter wheelbase).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jeffb
Posted on Wednesday, March 18, 2009 - 09:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The 100" fits fine in a tuber. I work for S&S and have had a 91" (4" bore x 3.625" stroke) in my X1. S&S had a S1 with a 100. I have a 100 with B1 heads in my X1 bonneville bike.

The 100 comes with the top and front engine mount it takes to make the engine fit. The engine is .200" taller than stock. An out of the box 100 makes about 110 hp and 110 ft-lbs. The big difference over the other 88 or 90 engines is the low end torque. The 100 makes over 90 ft lbs at 2000 rpm.

My 100 with race heads on it makes 140 at the rear wheel. I know others out there are making more.

S&S also has an 89" kit that is .430" taller than stock that fits in stock cases (3-5/8 bore). This is a tight squeze, but people have done it.

1999 and later frames are a little easier to fit the big engines in because the frame isn't as narrow around the rear rocker box.

Jeff
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

186bigtwin
Posted on Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 09:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thank Jeff, so it'll fit pretty good huh? Well then with max effort heads you could have 160rwhp, that would be a monster..............
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration