| Author | Message | ||
     Tootal |
Jeff, I think I posted that link on another thread. I found it interesting and believable. The fact they admitted they designed it for foreign governments to elect American friendly people makes sense. I had a friend in intelligence and we had several "hypothetical" conversations about taking out dictators and why we didn't sometimes. The number 2 guy is even worse, was the answer. | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/when_ is_a_perfect_oval_evidence_of_vote_fraud.html No Perfect ovals in ADA or faked votes. The Machine has a library of "random marks" it uses to guarantee anonymity to the disabled... And the thief. A system Designed to cheat. Btw, I was one of hundreds in Monroe County who volunteered to test voting machines. The choice was based on testing & #1 demand was a paper ballot to recount. The previous system used gears and counters and had no way to recount except the mechanical read out on the back of the booth. We didn't get the hour plus sales pitch. Or we might have burned him at the stake. | ||
| Ebutch |
Release The Kraken Kraken Pie Obama-Kraken (Message edited by blake on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Ducxl |
I think President Donald Trump is exiting office using "scorched earth policy". And he has every right to do so imo. (Message edited by ducxl on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Ebutch |
this never Conceded  (Message edited by ebutch on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Blake |
Shocking to find some actual investigative reporting on the Dominion issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=746HTjhFifA And here's Sidney Powell's latest interview and comments where she implicates the Governor and Sec. of State of Georgia, and says the cases they'll soon be filing will be "biblical." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y68pEknYyCM (Message edited by blake on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Blake |
Hey Court and Hogs, Is there a major case of fraud based on solid suspicions and whistleblower affidavits that publicly provided evidence proving the case in under two weeks, anywhere? When Democrats accused the President of bribery/quid-pro-quo RE Ukraine, were they required to prove their case in public within two or three weeks? They had the evidence, or so they claimed. They lied. Yet the legal process was allowed to play out, the impeachment hoax. I sincerely doubt that Sidney Powell is lying. Sworn affidavits are evidence. The persons so swearing their testimony are subject to severe criminal penalties if they are untruthful. The primary detailed hard evidence is for trial, for the judge and jury, not for public consumption beforehand. Then we have the case of Dominion's VP and Director of Security and Strategy. He's Antifa. He hates Trump. He is quoted as having claimed to have made sure Trump wouldn't win. Nothing to see there though? So much more. Lots of actual evidence already provided, the sworn testimony of mass ballot dumps in the wee hours after GOP watchers were told operations were ending for the night. Pristine ballots, no creases (so obviously never put inside the security envelope), stacks of ballots marked for Biden with no down vote, stacks of biden ballots run through tabulating machines multiple times, suspicious looking ballots apparently mechanically marked or duplicated, so much more still. Dominion machine tabulation switching 6,000 Trump for Biden votes in high concentration GOP county. That was no flocking "human error". The machine produced that result. The software needed updating to not switch votes??? BULLSHIT!!! No one in DOJ cares? The news is reporting none of this. | ||
| Blake |
Dead people voting en mass. Non-citizens receiving mail-in ballots. Tens of thousands showing up to vote in person being told they already voted by mail, when they did no such thing. Had to fill out provisional ballots and just test the system, the one that prevented GOP poll watchers from being able to challenge any mail-in ballots. How stupid do they think we are? | ||
| H0gwash |
Judge Matthew Brann, a former Pennsylvania Republican Party official, wrote: "In this action, the Trump Campaign and the Individual Plaintiffs seek to discard millions of votes legally cast by Pennsylvanians from all corners - from Greene County to Pike County, and everywhere in between. In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence." | ||
| Whisperstealth |
Blake, It's not just that they think we are stupid, they firmly believe they can get away with it. And why shouldn't they? They've gotten away with it for decades with no consequences. And with their friends in the media, they are likely to get away with it again... (Message edited by whisperstealth on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Aesquire |
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/11/fig hting-words-by-david-horowitz.php | ||
| Blake |
Hogs, If the election has been massively corrupted, it should stand cause lots of people voted? That is what that judge's argument amounts to, and it is absolute garbage. Democrats can break the law and steal an election cause lots of people voted? Seriously? Answer one question: Why would Democrats in Philadelphia, Detroit, and other Democrat city strongholds in battleground states prevent GOP poll watchers from legally scrutinizing and challenging mail-in ballot processing and tabulating? PA law requires poll watchers have the right to challenge every voter and to scrutinize counting and tabulating. Mail-in ballots afford scrutiny and challenge of the voter at the point of initial ballot processing/opening, verifying signatures and voter status, NONE of which was permitted in Philadelphia, Detroit, and other similar Democrat city strongholds. They could have literally processed hundreds of thousands of bogus ballots and no GOP watcher was there to see it. That is blatantly illegal, and there is only one plausible explanation for violating that law. But oh well, lots of people voted so just you never mind???????? (Message edited by blake on November 22, 2020) | ||
| Blake |
Hogs, The judge could simply discard the ballots that were illegally processed in the illegally enforced absence of GOP poll watchers. Do you think the Democrat scofflaws might then learn their lesson and cease their corrupt electioneering thuggery? Can you imagine if Republican stronghold counties tried to do what the Democrats did in Philadelphia, Detroit and other similar Democrat city strongholds? The "news" media would be on fire about it. But now all we hear from them is their gaslighting lie that "there is no evidence of wide spread voter fraud." This shall not pass. | ||
| Blake |
Whisperstealth, Keep the faith patriot. Going by Sidney Powell's comments, she is not going to let it pass. I believe her. I think a LOT of patriots, many in key positions may also be backing us up. It may well turn ugly. The price of apathy is far too great. We must keep the faith. | ||
| Blake |
PA poll watcher law: https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/Documents/E lections%20Division/Administration/Rights%20of%20W atchers%20Candidates%20Attorneys.pdf Pertinent excerpts with boldface and red highlighting by me: Section 310 of the Election Code (Code), 25 P.S. § 2650, outlines the rights of watchers, candidates and attorneys as they relate to sessions of the county board of elections. (Such sessions include the computation, tabulation or canvassing of unofficial election returns on the night of the primary or election and the official computation and canvass that begin on the third day following the primary or election.) • Qualified watchers at sessions of the county board may exercise the same rights as poll watchers. Section 310(a) • Watchers allowed in the polling place are entitled to challenge the qualifications of voters in accordance with the provisions of section 1210(d) of the Code (25 P.S. § 3050(d)). Section 417(b) Blake>>> Question: How may watchers challenge qualifications of mail-in voters? Answer: The only way is to personally view and verify the signature, and registered voter identity/status at the time of mail-in ballot opening. • Watchers allowed in the polling place are entitled to inspect the voting check list and either of the two numbered lists of voters during those intervals when voters are not present in the polling place, provided that the watcher does not mark upon or alter any of these official records. (The judge of election must either personally supervise or delegate supervision of such inspection of the list or lists.) Section 417(b) • Each candidate whose candidacy may be affected by matters pending before the county board, including any computation, canvass, recount or recanvass of returns, is entitled to be present and participate in the proceeding in person or by his or her duly authorized attorney. Section 310(b); • Any candidate, attorney or watcher present at a recount or recanvass is entitled to examine the ballots and raise objections regarding such ballots. Section 310(c) | ||
| Hughlysses |
It’s hard to see how this can be a good thing, but opinions on Twitter are all over the place.  | ||
| H0gwash |
Quite the opposite. Judge Matthew Brann statement is very clear that he did consider the scenario where he would be forced to throw out lots of people's votes. Such a scenario would require compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption. That didn't happen, Trump gave crappy arguments, speculative accusations unsupported by evidence. Trump had the American presidency to gain by providing solid evidence and he presented effectively nothing. It seems that the claim that there is evidence *is the fraud*. Poll watches were prevented from entering the building where votes were being tallied because the building exceeded occupancy. So, yes, GOP poll watchers were denied entry, just like Democrat and Independent poll watchers. There were already too many GOP poll watchers in the building already. Your complaint is truth, but it is not the whole truth. | ||
| Court |
Tough deal ... The correlation to the ridiculous “Russians did it” is a good one and the salient difference is the pending deadline in the instant situation. My comfort is that the Republicans had the most ama ing showing ever in the Congress. That, coupled with Biden’s long history of doing nothing .... aggravated by the showdown he’ll have with progressives ... may offer some, albeit little comfort, protection. My first objective would be for the Republicans to start grooming viable candidates through renewed recruitment. | ||
| Whisperstealth |
Blake, Thanks for the words of encouragement! I'm trying! Sure would be nice to have about 100 acres out in the middle of nowhere with both supplies and the means to defend it! Court, I hope you are right, and no permanent damage is done if Biden does get in. And I agree, viable candidates do need to be found. | ||
| Blake |
Hogs, You're still not getting it. GOP watchers were corralled as much as 100 feet away from ballot processing and tabulating stations, prevented from observing and challenging the validity of mail-in ballots and the voter associated with them, as they are legally entitled to do. PA law mandates that poll watchers are “entitled to challenge the qualifications of voters” and are “entitled to examine the ballots and raise objections regarding such ballots.” Watchers are supposed to be able to observe every voter validation. 

For mail-in ballots, the only chance to challenge voter validity is when the envelopes are opened and their signatures are verified against the record. GOP observers were prevented from even observing let alone challenging any mail-in ballots/voters. That was illegal. It was done for one and only one plausible reason, to cover for massive fraud. The judge's statements may be clear and be wrong. Happens all the time. You cannot ram through hundreds of thousands of voters via non-scrutinized mail-in ballots. That is illegal. The judge could have just tossed those affected invalid ballots. He sure cannot vouch for their validity. To say, "but gee, there's so many voters affected, so I'll let the criminal activity pass" is just giving all such vote fraud operations a big green flag. We cannot have that. | ||
| Blake |
Hugh, General Flynn says all is well and she is full steam ahead. Must be some financial or legal strategy in play.  | ||
| Blake |
Solid analysis indicating fraud in GA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp0u4dw7GH4 | ||
| Blake |
Court, Powell says she has another month to make her case and prove by a preponderance of evidence that mass election fraud was perpetrated in the various states. I hope it doesn't take that long, but that's just a week longer than Al Gore used in 2000. I remain optimistic. I don't think the republic will survive another term of globalist leftist sabotage and further deep state entrenchment. The Chinese own the Bidens. | ||
| Court |
No doubt about the Chinese ......Hunter got sucked into the financial honey trap. Hope springs eternal ..... but, what Sydney Powell says matters little after she was fired by the Trump team last night and 30 Courts have tossed the Trump legal actions. I don’t like it but I’m preparing ..... (Message edited by Court on November 23, 2020) | ||
| Hughlysses |
Very interesting affidavit from an IT expert regarding Michigan voting: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.g and.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf | ||
| Aesquire |
https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/22/a-time-of-chaos -upon-chaos-atop-chaos/ | ||
| H0gwash |
GOP watchers were corralled as much as 100 feet away from ballot processing and tabulating stations, prevented from observing and challenging the validity of mail-in ballots and the voter associated with them, as they are legally entitled to do. Pollwatchers of all types are an essential part of the election process and should be accommodated. If the GOP is suing the system and demanding restitution, they need to provide proof they GOP pollwatchers were discriminated against. The defendants no doubt showed extensive logs showing the maximum number of GOP pollwatchers were already in the building at all times. Trump was unable to show that the excluded GOP pollwatchers were being treated any differently from all the other excluded pollwatchers all around them. Trump will probably appeal so maybe we'll hear better evidence next time. | ||
| H0gwash |
Solid analysis indicating fraud in GA: Numbers on a spreadsheet are easily faked. Maybe it is a lead. Forward it to Linsey Graham, he seems to be the GOP Election Fraud lead for GA, maybe he can make use of it. | ||
| Aesquire |
As I told a friend yesterday, there are no "Statistical Impossibilities". Weird stuff happens. There are statistically ridiculous things. So imho the Biden Win is a UFO sighting. Looks just like a ceiling lamp reflected in a window. I could be wrong, but I've seen a lot of ceiling lamps. Thrown a lot of Frisbees. Just because every other picture I've seen of a UFO was fake, & I can't count the number of UFO pictures that are obvious lenticular clouds, doesn't guarantee this one is fake. But it's a easy call & great bet. The bottom line is at least half the country has no reason to accept the reported results from known partisan lying media. 70% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats believe the election is untrustworthy. Cheating Bernie out of the race... Twice, means even the hard left "knows" it's fake. | ||
| Court |
Bernie Sanders is a human meme of the stacked deck of American politics. Why. . . . After Hillary got outed putting up the bucks to “shelve” the oil’ codger . . . . He kept coming back is beyond me. He really is like a mentally challenged person who just saw ET. I think he truly believes some of that weird shit he spews but to the rest of the world. . . Save a handful of stonedflakes. . . . He doesn’t even become a blip on the screen of reality. |
