Again, I’m not being sarcastic… The New York Times openly admits that anti-Jewish hate crimes don’t interest the Times because white supremacists are not behind them [emphasis added]:
If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy. During the past 22 months, not one person caught or identified as the aggressor in an anti-Semitic hate crime has been associated with a far right-wing group, Mark Molinari, commanding officer of the police department’s Hate Crimes Task Force, told me.
In fact, it is the varied backgrounds of people who commit hate crimes in the city that make combating and talking about anti-Semitism in New York much harder.
So let’s boil it down… The New York Times spent two years spreading a hoax, will spend the next year spreading another hoax about Trump being racist, and has no interest in covering an actual rise in anti-Jewish hate crimes because the haters are not wearing MAGA hats.
Personally, I don't want to sit in the same room as a sex slavery person quite likely to be "shot in a failed robbery attempt" like a DNC staffer who leaked dirt to Wikileaks. Or in rifle range of her, either.
Funny, I happen to know all about Danish control of Greenland, it's history from initial colonization, abandonment because of Global Cooling, ( & the African Ivory trade ) it's occupation & Iceland's in WW2 when Socialists conquered Denmark, the rules and regulations on light planes flying cross Atlantic & stopping in Greenland for fuel & crew rest, and the use of Great Circle navigation to get there, then on to Ireland.
So, yeah, I not only know where it is, I know the landing pattern down the fjord to the runway that dead ends at the glacier. Also that I may need to dodge icebergs on the way down the fjord. It's not the safest airport in Greenland, but it has a great history, with abandoned Viking age huts in walking distance.
The Party of Jim Crow embraces racism in every way, except admitting it's their reason to exist. Or they ever did anything racist. Or the truth, ever.
And teaching kids lies and twisting history to make America evil predates today's all hate all the time propaganda efforts.
I watched as Democrat, racist, LBJ take Kennedy's involvement in the failure of France and blow it into insane, useless war as they drafted America's youth and sent them to war, while refusing to let them win.
I went through High school as the graduating classes before me lost lives, and the returning survivors told of insane Rules Of Engagement where they were forbidden to carry loaded guns, and forbidden to bomb SAM missile sites until after SAMe had been fired at their planes. Stockpiles of Soviet supplied weapons were off limits. Soviet ships unloaded arms to be used to kill Americans, in total safety, as LBJ sent us to die without being allowed to shoot back.
Then Nixon ran on getting us out of the Democrat's war, and did so, and Republicans were blamed for that war as Democrats embraced KGB sponsored agitprop & protests turned to riots as the guilty lied about the recent past.
Culminating in a Democrat Congress screwing the Vietnamese people by breaking their word on aid, giving the South to the Communists who promptly murdered tens of millions. Hundreds of thousands were lost at sea as they tried to escaped the slaughter in overloaded fishing boats.
And the treasonous Democrats lied, and still lie, about THAT. To this day former Secretary of State John Kerry denied the Holocaust he helped create ever happened.
It's deja vu over and over as Democrats deny every iota of responsibility while they blame their actions of centuries past on You and the only person they hate more than you, Jews and blacks, Donald.
The defence that Fox has more visitors than CNN on social media, and therefore Google/YouTube & Facebook can discriminate against non violent politics opinion is bull.
I'm not alone in not using Fox, or anyone's social media site's for news. I do use the Alphabet company's services for information, and I understand they are massively biased, a filter I apply to NPR & talk radio.
But claiming that somewhere, out there, someone tells the truth and is less biased, and therefore it's ok for Them to lie and censor illegally, is many flavors of wrong.
To be fair, governments around the world pressure platforms to censor speech illegally. ( for companies claiming to be a platform & not an editing publisher ) In some cases, like wanting to censor terrorist groups like ISIS calling for mass murder, it seems justified, and you might agree. In other cases like propping up the lies of the Chinese government and deleting all criticism of their murders and oppression, it may be less appealing to you. I consider it a matter of greed & enabling the most evil management in history, At Google. The most murderous government in human history ( Red China) at least has the excuse they remember the age of warlords and constant war. Some of the oldest, personally.
This is just outrageous reporting of BS. Based on a single anonymous source, with no documentation. Sad state of "journalism". I surprised he isn't saying that the story may be wrong, but was correct in it's essence. This kind of thing used to end carriers!
This reminds me of the Great BRITISH tv show Connections where the host humorously blamed the Dutch for all the bad things in the world.
With some justification. But it helps your understanding to know that England & Holland were at war with each ither, on & off, for centuries. So it's a bit biased view of history.
After all, we rebellious ungrateful colonists know how sparkling clean England's colonial record is! ( sarcasm )
This is, basically, just another anti-western civilization propaganda item. The NYT has gone to an all racism policy, to destroy Trump, and pave the way for the New Socialist Order. Bezos's media machine is all on-board to destroy America.
To be fair, the Dutch and other European colonial powers were greedy monsters who did terrible things. And I'm always ready to pick on Starbucks.
I just don't have any reason at all to be ashamed of some foreign country's transgressions or some company I don't buy anything from.
Listening to NPR this morning. Report from Texas an undocumented workers. Local chicken slaughter industry is mostly illegals, taking jobs Americans won't do because it's dangerous, underpaid, work. Wow, rare moment of reality.
Then they talk to a trailer frame maker. Hard, back breaking work in hot environment, heavy metal, welding, pays $20-30 hour. Recent raid took 1000 out of 1700 employees. And because of backlog in the courts, after 5 are deported the rest go work for his competitors. He can't hire them back since he now officially knows they are illegal, so he loses "700 years of experience" with some workers 7 + year employees. But they all immediately got jobs with his competition. And he complains with high labor costs the companies are moving to Mexico.
No questions or comments about if he knew he had hired illegals. Zip.
Then the reporter & expert in the studio rant how the labor market changed in the last 16 months. From 5 workers seeking 1 job, suddenly , it's 2 jobs per worker.
For the first time in this experts life, this job to worker ratio reversed! Wages are rising! Any one willing to work can have a better paying job! Total reversal in just the last 16 months!
And she figuratively blows a hernia trying to spin this as not a great sign that Trump's policies improved life for the working poor in America. Instead it's a disaster as companies counting on cheap labor exploitation move to Mexico!
As the joke goes, Trump could cure cancer & be condemned for putting doctors and nurses out of business.
Hmm, if it could be proved the employer knew the status and hired them anyway,( a federal crime), could some sort of criminal asset forfeiture be employed to seize the business? Once wholly controlled by court order for disposal to the U.S. Marshall , it could be auctioned back out to the highest bidders in the private sector? ( but no one affiliated with the former entity) This would give entrepreneurs willing to follow the law, a ground floor opportunity to get, (in the example mentioned here), into the trailer manufacturing business. It would also be a chilling reminder to other businesses to follow the law in regards to hiring undocumented individuals.
For those investors who watched their stock value fall to zero, it also reminds them to look at more than the bottom line on the quarterly dividend statement when deciding to invest. It's bad practice to be pro business, at the expense of the people you employ.
If the consequences of getting caught are greater than the savings of hiring "off the books", the supply of good cash paying day laborer jobs dries up. For legal resident workers, or those non residents on lawful work VISAs, wages (by supply and demand),should go up. From the potential illegal workers point of view, with less financial opportunity, illegal entry becomes an even less attractive option.
I know it won't completely solve the problem, and might introduce a few new ones, but its an interesting thought excercise.