G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board » President Trump » Archive 2016 - 2018 » Archive through February 10, 2017 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 09:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

DOJ choked big time.




quote:

I liked Krauthammer's assessment of the DOJ legal team . . . "probably didn't graduate at the top of their class"...a neophyte first year law student may have done a better job of building a logical persuasive argument.



I'm still trying to come to grips with the root reason as to "why," but the task of orally presenting the DOJ's side of the case last night landed in August Flentje's lap at the very last second. (In fact, several times he touched on how quickly things had happened - for which the judges duly excoriated him; he wasn't referring to the overall case, he was referring to HIM being thrust into this position.) He was involved in preparing the legal challenge to the TRO, certainly, but he was NOT expecting to be (nor had he prepared to be) the actual mouthpiece for the DOJ last night. The Acting Solicitor General and Acting Assistant Attorney General "opted out" of this deal at the last moment, "...out of an abundance of caution, in light of a last-minute filing of an amicus brief by their former law firm." (See page 12 here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3455440-DO J-reply-in-support-of-lifting-stay-on-travel-ban.h tml#document/p2)

Yes, Flentje sounded nervous at times, and there's no question he was facing at least one, and more likely two, leftist/activist judges last night. Michelle Friedman, in particular, was outright hostile and combative; her bias was plain to see (hear).

As I understand it, the merits (or lack thereof) of the DOJ's request for a stay of the TRO will be based on the "Reply In Support Of Emergency Motion For Stay Pending Appeal" - you can read the entire document at the link I provided above. It is, of course, well-presented and documented, citing many precedents found in case law. I'm no law scholar, but I've read it several times and it sure appears to be bulletproof. The oral arguments last night were, as I understand it, a chance for counsel for both sides to "augment" their respective cases before the judges deliberate.

Again, Mr. Flentje was thrust into his position last night at the last second; there's plenty of speculation floating around on the 'net of "foul play" regarding this, but nothing I can point to with confidence that this was a pre-planned, deliberate ploy.

In spite of Mr. Flentje's performance (which, BTW, improved considerably as the hearing went on, particularly when the judges gave him additional time to speak at the end), the judges are SUPPOSED to consider each sides' merits based on the law, and NOT simply on the oral presentations last night from Mr. Flentje and Mr. Purcell.

All that said, I can't agree more with the sentiments posted by others: That a federal judge can, with the most marginal level of pretzel logic to make his case, usurp the President's clearly-enumerated, nearly unlimited powers regarding immigration, even temporarily, is breathtaking.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 09:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Little "coup" in the DOJ?

It was packed by Barry. We pretty obviously need serious purging of Barry loyalists in govt.

Gitmo for domestic terrorists? Plenty of room there for Soros. Follow the Barry & Bill pattern of secret arrests?
Turn Soros over to Russia for interrogation? ( I hear they've already promised to execute Soros )

Trump has been declared Satan & Hitler. Be a bit of a shock if he acted like the Progressives.

Not a suggestion. Just an observation.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 09:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-0 2-08/prominent-republicans-begin-push-to-tax-carbo n-cut-regulations

Call this the "rich bribed us act based on lies to screw the middle class act of 2017 "
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 10:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Little "coup" in the DOJ?

Perhaps.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 01:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Thank you to our great Police Chiefs & Sheriffs for your leadership & service. You have a true friend in the @WhiteHouse. We support you! -- President Donald J. Trump, 02/08/2017




See pic at https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4JxWpzWIAIin-j.jpg

Source: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/8293499 43613734912/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

(Message edited by blake on February 10, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 03:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

In Oval Office with Trump, Intel Corp. CEO announces $7 billion investment in its "newest most advanced factory," in Chandler, Arizona.




Photo: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4KauscUYAIvZQi.jpg

^ Source: https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/8293955 06476568583/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZzFUmROFLY



At 3:54 a reporter asks Mr. Krzanich, "And how long have you been planning this investment?"

Brian Krzanich: "We've been working on this factory for several years. We've held off, actually, doing this investment until now."

Reporter: "Was there something that President Trump did or said that made you want to announce this here and now?"

Krzanich: "It's really in support of the tax and regulatory policies that we see the Administration pushing forward that really make it advantageous to do manufacturing in the US."

BOOM!

Thank you, Mr. President.

(Message edited by blake on February 10, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 04:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yes, Thank You, Mr. President.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 07:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

SHOCK POLL Collapses Media Narrative – Overwhelming EU Support for a Muslim Ban
By Sundance, 02/08/2017

A stunning poll of ten European nations with over 10,000 respondents finds overwhelming support for a Muslim immigration ban within the EU. In total, 55% agree Muslim immigration should be stopped, only 20% disagree.



The question asked was:


quote:

All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped - do you agree or disagree?



Poland:
Agree 71%
Disagree 9%

Hungary:
Agree 64%
Disagree 12%

UK:
Agree 47%
Disagree 23%

Austria:
Agree 65%
Disagree 18%

Italy:
Agree 51%
Disagree 23%

France:
Agree 61%
Disagree 16%

Spain:
Agree 41%
Disagree 32%

Greece:
Agree 58%
Disagree 20%

Germany:
Agree 53%
Disagree 19%

Belgium:
Agree 64%
Disagree 13%

TOTAL:
Agree 55%
Disagree 20%



This is a stunning rebuke to the political leadership within each of the nations who have intentionally stood aside and allowed unfettered mass migration and crisis.

Germany’s Angela Merkel was primary supporter and advocate of mass immigration and a borderless European Union. 53% of the German people supporting a Muslim ban, and only 19% disagree.

The Chatham House poll, conducted with Kantar Public, surveyed adult citizens within: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain and the U.K. The survey was carried out between Dec. 12, 2016, and Jan. 11, 2017, and involved 10,195 respondents. (Full Survey Details)

Source, more: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/08/sh ock-poll-collapses-media-narrative-overwhelming-eu -support-for-a-muslim-ban/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 07:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

What Do Europeans Think About Muslim Immigration?
By Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs - 02/07/2017

President Donald Trump's executive order to ban citizens of seven Muslim-majority states from entering the US for 90 days, and temporarily freeze all refugee arrivals (including Syrians indefinitely), has been interpreted widely as an attempt to curtail the inward migration of Muslims, which Trump and his supporters argue pose a threat to national security.Trump's policy has generated a backlash among some of Europe's leaders. Angela Merkel's spokesman said the chancellor had 'explained' the UN Refugee Convention to the president in a phone call discussing the order, while London Mayor Sadiq Khan argued that the invitation to the president for a state visit to Britain in 2017 should be withdrawn until the ban is rescinded. Meanwhile, leaders of Europe's populist right-wing parties, including Geert Wilders, Nigel Farage and Matteo Salvini, have heaped praise on Trump. Amid these competing views, where do the public in European countries stand on the specific issue of Muslim immigration? There is evidence to suggest that both Trump and these radical right-wing parties reflect an underlying reservoir of public support.

...In our survey, carried out before President Trump's executive order was announced, respondents were given the following statement: 'All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped.' They were then asked to what extent did they agree or disagree with this statement. Overall, across all 10 of the European countries an average of 55% agreed that all further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped, 25% neither agreed nor disagreed and 20% disagreed.

...These results chime with other surveys exploring attitudes to Islam in Europe. In a Pew survey of 10 European countries in 2016, majorities of the public had an unfavorable view of Muslims living in their country in five countries: Hungary (72%), Italy (69%), Poland (66%), Greece (65%), and Spain (50%), although those numbers were lower in the UK (28%), Germany (29%) and France (29%). There was also a widespread perception in many countries that the arrival of refugees would increase the likelihood of terrorism, with a median of 59% across ten European countries holding this view.



Source, more: https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/what-d o-europeans-think-about-muslim-immigration#
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 07:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Senate Confirms Attorney General Jeff Sessions
By Sundance, 02/08/2017

Senator Jeff Sessions passed the confirmation process on Wednesday night, despite the antics of most Democrats within the upper chamber. Sessions won unanimous backing from Senate Republicans, and picked up the support of Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia.

Congratulations Attorney General Jeff Sessions!



There is a desperate tremor in the dark force, as justice now looms... ( continue reading --> )



Source, more: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/08/se nate-confirms-attorney-general-jeff-sessions/



Thank you Senator Manchin.

MAGA

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



Source: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/829476256559 276032/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Dang, this is such good news:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DoP02aowMs
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Njloco
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 08:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Don't worry fb1, dip sh.t from down under will still disagree with you above mentioned statistics.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, February 08, 2017 - 09:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

TOO MUCH WINNING! : )


quote:

Elizabeth Warren 'Silenced' Again After Video Surfaces Of MLK's Wife Thanking Senator Sessions
By Tyler Durden, 02/08/2017

After being silenced last night on the Senate floor during her desperate racial stunt to read disparaging remarks about now-confirmed Attorney-General Jeff Sessions, we suspect Senator Elizabeth Warren is lost for words as video surfaces of Coretta Scott King thanking Senator Sessions at the launching of the Rosa Parks Library and Museum.

The racially-divisive stunt that Senator Warren tried to pull last night - by quoting a letter from the late Coretta Scott King, civil rights activist and wife of Martin Luther King Jr., who wrote in 1986, during Sessions' failed confirmation hearing for a federal judgeship, that he “had used the awesome power of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens" as a U.S. attorney in Alabama - ended with her being silenced by Senate vote:





Tonight, we suspect she will choose to silence herself as more recent video of Coretta Scott King surfaces destroying her warrant-less claim was that King’s wife’s words framed Sessions as a bigot, as she thanks Senator Sessions for his help in the construction of the Rosa Parks Library and Museum:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmVAbxDgV2s


As far as Senator Warren is concerned, even MLK's niece lambasted her for playing the race card.

^ Source, more: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-08/




quote:

The niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. says that Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren was attempting to play the race card by reading a letter from Coretta Scott King to smear Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions on the floor of the Senate Tuesday night.

“It’s almost like a bait and switch — stir up their emotions, use the name of King…play the race card, which she was attempting to do,” Dr. Alveda King told Fox Business’ Neil Cavuto during an interview on Wednesday.



^ Source, more: http://truepundit.com/video-mlks-niece-accuses-eli zabeth-warren-of-playing-the-race-card-in-senate-f loor-charade/

edited to shrink image for improved page readability

(Message edited by Blake on February 10, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Njloco
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 08:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

O.k, so now CNN interviews Senator Richard Blumenthal on a Judge Gorsuch statement, made behind closed doors.

At a ceremony honoring veterans and senior citizens who sent presents to soldiers overseas, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut rose and spoke of an earlier time in his life.
Multimedia


Interactive Feature
Assessing Blumenthal's Military Service Records
The Times's Raymond Hernandez on The Takeaway
Related

Campaign in Damage Control Over ‘a Few Misplaced Words’ (May 19, 2010)
Times Topic: Richard Blumenthal
Room for Debate: Politicians and Their Fake War Stories (May 19, 2010)
Résumés Made for Fibbing (May 23, 2010)
Enlarge This Image

John Olson/Time & Life Pictures — Getty Images
AN ASSISTANT IN THE NIXON WHITE HOUSE In 1969, Richard Blumenthal was hired by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, presidential urban affairs adviser.
Enlarge This Image

An official log of Mr. Blumenthal's Selective Service record. He received a series of educational and occupational deferments from 1965 to 1970.
Enlarge This Image

Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
A CANDIDATE FOR THE SENATE Mr. Blumenthal at an April forum in Monroe. He is running for the seat Christopher J. Dodd is vacating.
Enlarge This Image

He served in the Marine Reserve.

Readers’ Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Read All Comments (1465) »
“We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” Mr. Blumenthal said to the group gathered in Norwalk in March 2008. “And you exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it — Afghanistan or Iraq — we owe our military men and women unconditional support.”

There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.

The deferments allowed Mr. Blumenthal to complete his studies at Harvard; pursue a graduate fellowship in England; serve as a special assistant to The Washington Post’s publisher, Katharine Graham; and ultimately take a job in the Nixon White House.

In 1970, with his last deferment in jeopardy, he landed a coveted spot in the Marine Reserve, which virtually guaranteed that he would not be sent to Vietnam. He joined a unit in Washington that conducted drills and other exercises and focused on local projects, like fixing a campground and organizing a Toys for Tots drive.

Many politicians have faced questions over their decisions during the Vietnam War, and Mr. Blumenthal, who is seeking the seat being vacated by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, is not alone in staying out of the war.

But what is striking about Mr. Blumenthal’s record is the contrast between the many steps he took that allowed him to avoid Vietnam, and the misleading way he often speaks about that period of his life now, especially when he is speaking at veterans’ ceremonies or other patriotic events.

Sometimes his remarks have been plainly untrue, as in his speech to the group in Norwalk. At other times, he has used more ambiguous language, but the impression left on audiences can be similar.

In an interview on Monday, the attorney general said that he had misspoken about his service during the Norwalk event and might have misspoken on other occasions. “My intention has always been to be completely clear and accurate and straightforward, out of respect to the veterans who served in Vietnam,” he said.

But an examination of his remarks at the ceremonies shows that he does not volunteer that his service never took him overseas. And he describes the hostile reaction directed at veterans coming back from Vietnam, intimating that he was among them.

In 2003, he addressed a rally in Bridgeport, where about 100 military families gathered to express support for American troops overseas. “When we returned, we saw nothing like this,” Mr. Blumenthal said. “Let us do better by this generation of men and women.”

At a 2008 ceremony in front of the Veterans War Memorial Building in Shelton, he praised the audience for paying tribute to troops fighting abroad, noting that America had not always done so.

“I served during the Vietnam era,” he said. “I remember the taunts, the insults, sometimes even physical abuse.”

Mr. Blumenthal, 64, is known as a brilliant lawyer who likes to argue cases in court and uses language with power and precision. He is also savvy about the news media and attentive to how he is portrayed in the press.

But the way he speaks about his military service has led to confusion and frequent mischaracterizations of his biography in his home state newspapers. In at least eight newspaper articles published in Connecticut from 2003 to 2009, he is described as having served in Vietnam.

The New Haven Register on July 20, 2006, described him as “a veteran of the Vietnam War,” and on April 6, 2007, said that the attorney general had “served in the Marines in Vietnam.” On May 26, 2009, The Connecticut Post, a Bridgeport newspaper that is the state’s third-largest daily, described Mr. Blumenthal as “a Vietnam veteran.” The Shelton Weekly reported on May 23, 2008, that Mr. Blumenthal “was met with applause when he spoke about his experience as a Marine sergeant in Vietnam.”

And the idea that he served in Vietnam has become such an accepted part of his public biography that when a national outlet, Slate magazine, produced a profile of Mr. Blumenthal in 2000, it said he had “enlisted in the Marines rather than duck the Vietnam draft.”

It does not appear that Mr. Blumenthal ever sought to correct those mistakes.

In the interview, he said he was not certain whether he had seen the stories or whether any steps had been taken to point out the inaccuracies.

“I don’t know if we tried to do so or not,” he said. He added that he “can’t possibly know what is reported in all” the articles that are written about him, given the large number of appearances he makes at military-style events.

He said he had tried to stick to a consistent way of describing his military experience: that he served as a member of the United State Marine Corps Reserve during the Vietnam era.

Asked about the Bridgeport rally, when he told the crowd, “When we returned, we saw nothing like this,” Mr. Blumenthal said he did not recall the event.

An aide pointed out that in a different appearance this year, Mr. Blumenthal was forthright about not having gone to war. In a Senate debate in March, he responded to a question about Iran and the use of military force by saying, “Although I did not serve in Vietnam, I have seen firsthand the effects of military action, and no one wants it to be the first resort, nor do we want to mortgage the country’s future with a deficit that is ballooning out of control.”

On a less serious matter, another flattering but untrue description of Mr. Blumenthal’s history has appeared in profiles about him. In two largely favorable profiles, the Slate article and a magazine article in The Hartford Courant in 2004 with which he cooperated, Mr. Blumenthal is described prominently as having served as captain of the swim team at Harvard. Records at the college show that he was never on the team.

Mr. Blumenthal said he did not provide the information to reporters, was unsure how it got into circulation and was “astonished” when he saw it in print.

Mr. Blumenthal has made veterans’ issues a centerpiece of his public life and his Senate campaign, but even those who have worked closely with him have gotten the misimpression that he served in Vietnam.

In an interview, Jean Risley, the chairwoman of the Connecticut Vietnam Veterans Memorial Inc., recalled listening to an emotional Mr. Blumenthal offering remarks at the dedication of the memorial. She remembered him describing the indignities that he and other veterans faced when they returned from Vietnam.

“It was a sad moment,” she recalled. “He said, ‘When we came back, we were spat on; we couldn’t wear our uniforms.’ It looked like he was sad to me when he said it.”

Ms. Risley later telephoned the reporter to say she had checked into Mr. Blumenthal’s military background and learned that he had not, in fact, served in Vietnam.

The Vietnam chapter in Mr. Blumenthal’s biography has received little attention despite his nearly three decades in Connecticut politics.

But now, after repeatedly shunning opportunities for higher office, Mr. Blumenthal is the man Democrats nationally are depending on to retain the seat they controlled for 30 years under Mr. Dodd, and he is likely to face more intense scrutiny.

After obtaining Mr. Blumenthal’s Selective Service records through a Freedom of Information Act request, The New York Times asked David Curry, a professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis and an expert on the Vietnam draft, to examine them.

Mr. Curry said the records showed that Mr. Blumenthal had received at least five deferments. Mr. Blumenthal did not dispute that but said he did not know how many deferments he had received.

Mr. Blumenthal grew up in New York City, the son of a successful businessman who ran an import-export company.

As a young man, he attended Riverdale Country School in the Bronx and showed great promise, along with an ability to ingratiate himself with powerful people.

In 1963, he entered Harvard College, where he met Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who served on the faculty there and guided Mr. Blumenthal’s senior thesis on the failure of government poverty programs.

He received two student deferments during his undergraduate years there, the records show.

After graduating from Harvard in 1967, military records show, Mr. Blumenthal obtained another educational deferment and headed to Britain, where he filed stories for The Washington Post and attended Trinity College, Cambridge, on a graduate fellowship.

But in early 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson, under pressure over criticism that wealthier young men were avoiding the draft through graduate school, abolished nearly all graduate deferments and sharply increased the number of troops sent to Southeast Asia.

That summer, Mr. Blumenthal’s draft classification changed from 2-S, an educational deferment, to 2-A, an occupational deferment — a rare exemption from military service for men who contended that it was in the “national health, safety and interest” for them to remain in their civilian jobs. At the time, he was working as a special assistant to Ms. Graham, whose son Donald he had befriended at Harvard. Half a year later, after the election of President Richard M. Nixon, Mr. Blumenthal went to work in the White House as a senior staff assistant to Mr. Moynihan, who was Nixon’s urban affairs adviser.

But at the end of that year, he became eligible for induction after he drew a low number in a draft lottery held on Dec. 1, 1969. His number was 152, and people with numbers as high as 195 could be drafted, according to the Selective Service.

Two months after the lottery, in February 1970, Mr. Blumenthal obtained a second occupational deferment, according to the records. The status of people with occupational deferments, however, was growing shakier, with the war raging and the Nixon administration increasingly uncomfortable with them.

In April 1970, Mr. Blumenthal secured a spot in the Marine Corps Reserve, which was regarded as a safe harbor for those who did not want to go to war.

“The Reserves were not being activated for Vietnam and were seen as a shelter for young privileged men,” Mr. Curry said.

But Mr. Blumenthal’s campaign manager, Mindy Myers, said Monday that any suggestion that he was ducking the war was unfounded, saying he was engaged in important work. When he worked for Ms. Graham, for example, he helped teach children in a public school in the Anacostia section of Washington, for a project she had started there.

“It’s flat wrong to imply that Richard Blumenthal’s decisions to take a Fiske Fellowship, teach inner-city schoolchildren and work in the White House for Daniel Patrick Moynihan were decisions to avoid service when in fact, while still eligible for a deferment, he chose to enlist in the Marine Corps Reserves and completed six months of service at Parris Island, S.C., and then six years of service in the Reserves.”

Mr. Blumenthal landed in the Fourth Civil Affairs Group in Washington, whose members included the well-connected in Washington. At the time, the unit was not associated with the kind of hardship of traditional fighting units, according to Marine reports from the period and interviews with about a half-dozen men who served in the unit during the Vietnam years.

In the 1970s, the unit’s members were dispatched to undertake projects like refurbishing tent decks and showers at a campground for underprivileged Washington children, as well as collecting and distributing toys and games as part of regular Toys for Tots drives.

Robert Cole, a retired lieutenant colonel who did active duty overseas in the 1950s and later joined the unit as a reservist, recalled the young men who joined the unit in the late 1960s and early 1970s. “These kids we were getting in — a lot of them were worried about the draft,” he said.

After entering Yale Law School in the fall of 1970, Mr. Blumenthal transferred to a Marine Reserve unit in New Haven, Company C of the Sixth Motor Transport Battalion, Fourth Marine Division, which conducted occasional military drills, as well as participating in Christmas toy drives for children and recycling programs in neighboring communities, according to the unit’s command reports from the time.

In 1974, Mr. Blumenthal took a position as a law clerk for Justice Harry C. Blackmun of the United States Supreme Court and transferred back to a Washington unit, where he completed his service

And we're supposed to believe this guy ! How in hell did he ever get elected to public office ?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 10:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

A little off topic, but...

The Left Hates You. Act Accordingly.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 10:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 10:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ClWsJP3vbc
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 10:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Interesting tweet yesterday afternoon from P45; this is in reference to the Chatham House poll I posted here last night:


quote:

'Majority in Leading EU Nations Support Trump-Style Travel Ban'
Poll of more than 10,000 people in 10 countries...http://bit.ly/2k4fvqgEUPoll -- President Donald J. Trump, 02/08/2017



Source: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

BTW, when P45 sends out a tweet, it instantly reaches approximately 25,000,000 followers...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 11:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

PRESS RELEASE: Sheriffs Applaud Confirmation of @SenatorSessions http://sheriffs.org/Sheriffs-Applaud-Confirmation- of-Senator-Sessions … #sessionsconfirmation




Photo: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4L257pWYAE6PK2.jpg
^ Source: https://twitter.com/NationalSheriff/status/8294967 60137560065/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw



quote:

Sheriffs Applaud Confirmation of Senator Sessions
Thursday, February 9th, 2017

Alexandria, VA – National Sheriffs’ Association President Greg Champagne and Executive Director and CEO Jonathan Thompson released the following statement on today’s confirmation of U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions by the U.S. Senate.


quote:

“The nation’s sheriffs applaud and thank the U.S. Senate for confirming Jeff Sessions as the next U.S. Attorney General. Throughout his career, Attorney General Sessions has shown great integrity and a commitment and loyalty to fairness, equal justice and the rule of law. It’s those attributes and qualities he’ll use daily at the Department of Justice as the chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government.

“We look forward to working closely with Mr. Sessions to protect the homeland, secure our borders, fight crime, fund and equip law enforcement and keep our communities and counties safe and drug free.”




^ Source: http://sheriffs.org/Sheriffs-Applaud-Confirmation- of-Senator-Sessions

(Message edited by blake on February 10, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 11:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I was just watching Fox Business News as a group of Airline and Airport executives exited a meeting with Trump about infrastructure building. They all had very positive things to say about the meeting. Right after that, back in the FBN studio, the question was raised if Trump has spent his political capital too quickly. The immediate answer, which pointed to the meeting that just let out, was that Trump was building political capital by meet with, and listening too the key people in business that are needed to make things happen. In a word... Leadership! It's something that our country has been sorely lacking the past 8 years. I'm still skeptical of many things in Trumps agenda, but I do respect a true leader. He is making amazing progress, despite the obstructionist Democrats doing all they can to stall progress.

Ferris, Thanks for all the effort you have put into this thread. No doubt, I'm far better informed on many things due to your efforts. I don't think I'm alone in that. Thanks to all who have contributed!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 02:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thank you, and you're welcome.

-----------------------------


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZQWgSHoYsE
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 02:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xB-pbmQ-ZTY
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 03:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I suspect Kelly Anne will be leaving us soon . . . I kind of see her as the incarnation of the Peter Principle.

Being a great and successful campaign manager does not make, by extension, a person qualified to be a Senior Presidential Advisor.

Frankly . . . when she said this:


quote:

“Go buy Ivanka’s stuff, is what I would tell you. … I’m going to give it a free commercial here: Go buy it today".




The next words out of the President's mouth . . should have been . . . YOU'RE FIRED.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 03:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I suspect the following video will open some eyes. I'll post it up, and then offer some comments:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU7QM_P2DS8


Now that you've (hopefully) watched the vid, go back to 4:44 and hit pause. Did you catch it?

What Tommy Robinson is addressing, and what the screen grab at 4:44 partially documents, is called "consanguinity." I bet most people have never heard of the word, and have no idea what it means.

If you don't know, look it up; you'll be shocked. I guarantee it.

And.........you're then likely to have an "Aha!" moment.

This practice, which is not only accepted among certain cultures but is actually encouraged (generation, after generation, after generation, after generation, after generation...), might explain some things.

I imagine Mr. Robinson's words will disturb some folks.

That's OK; we're at war (although many of us don't know it or won't acknowledge it yet) and we SHOULD be disturbed.

Consanguinity, coming soon to a neighborhood near you?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Torquehd
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 09:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

So the appeals court has ruled against Trump.

Who are these ass clowns, and how do we deport them to Syria?

And how do we institute civil disobedience against this small band of individuals who think they know more than Trump (BTW- GOOGLE HIS IQ! HE'S A FREAKING GENIOUS AND I MEAN THAT) and follow the intentions of both our president and the majority of US citizens?

I'm sick of this ass clownery that is designed to breed terrorism, kill US citizens, and destroy everything that makes the US a safe, secure, constitutional republic, and that is why I voted for Trump.

(Message edited by torquehd on February 09, 2017)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Thursday, February 09, 2017 - 11:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Syria’s President Bashar Assad Admits Terrorist Embeds Within Syrian Refugee Population
By Sundance, 02/09/2017

Investigative reporter Michael Isikoff interviewed Syria’s Bashar al-Assad about the civil war and the ongoing refugee crisis. Isikoff did not expect to hear Assad confirm President Trump’s position that terrorists are embedded within the refugee community.

Worth noting, amid the 30,000-foot view of the larger issues, is how accessible Assad is to this western journalist interview. Ask yourselves, why hasn’t the New York Times, or Washington Post, interviewed Assad and delivered a similar finding?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5iW_k-YJ5U


Reminder, everything discussed in this interview has been previously outlined with documented research. This is not spin by Assad, there have been multiple independent sources who have confirmed these aspects.

quote:

(Via Yahoo News) Weighing in on one of the most contentious issues in American politics — the danger posed to host countries by the 4.8 million people who have fled from Syria’s civil war — Syrian President Bashar Assad told Yahoo News that some of the refugees are “definitely” terrorists.

In an exclusive interview with Yahoo News at a presidential office in Damascus, Assad said President Trump’s freeze on admitting refugees from his country — part of an executive order that has drawn widespread protests and is being challenged in federal court — “is an American issue” on which he would not take sides. But asked if some of those who fled are “aligned with terrorists,” Assad quickly replied, “Definitely.” (read more)




Source: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/09/sy rias-president-bashar-assad-admits-terrorist-embed s-within-syrian-refugee-population/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Friday, February 10, 2017 - 03:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

FB,

I edited out the wide pics, turned them into hyperlinks. They were making the font so small, and making the page difficult to read.

Thanks
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, February 10, 2017 - 05:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Send the judges to Syria? No way. Syria is a sovereign nation, puppet of the Russian Empire or not. They wouldn't take them. No desire to take communists in what is in reality a monarchy.

Gitmo. Plenty of room now that Barry released so many of his spiritual brothers. ( & no sisters, note )

But that's silly talk. Not going to happen. Impeachment is unlikely. Probably deserved.

I'm still holding out a forlorn hope that we can avoid violent revolution in the U.S.

Doesn't mean I don't think the AG & Governor of California maybe should be executed for treason. ; )

I'm not positive that's desirable. I mean, I'd get satisfaction from it but it's perhaps not ideal.

I'm willing to bet Donald will do something that I vehemently disagree with. I prefer not to be outlawed for my opinion. Bad enough Barry told his followers to beat folk like me.

Open violence against citizens is the tactic of evil men. Like Robert Reich or Hillary.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, February 10, 2017 - 06:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/9/refug ees-entering-us-doubled-rate-ruling-trump-tra/

State dept employees otoh who are in conflict with the new guy, them you can send to Syria. What's the ISIS held city? There, send them in a convoy to discuss women's rights. Make sure to notify Putin of the timing & course of the convoy. ; ) leak to CNN that Trump picked all Jews for the new envoys. ( ISIS watches CNN )

State has needed a major purge since FDR. It's gotten worse the last seventy years. Drastic measures are needed.
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration