G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board » President Trump » Archive 2016 - 2018 » Archive through November 28, 2016 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Friday, November 25, 2016 - 09:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

From the Reuters link:

quote:

Stein, who won just 1 percent of the national vote herself, told CNN that while there was no evidence of tampering or other voting errors in the election, only a full review in those states [Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania] would give Americans confidence in the results.



^ Breathtaking.

So:

Wisconsin = 10 electoral votes
Michigan = 16 electoral votes
Pennsylvania = 20 electoral votes

10 + 16 + 20 = 46 electoral votes

As it stands now, Trump has 306 electoral votes, Clinton has 232. You need at least 270 EVs to win the presidency.

Do the math:

Trump: 306 - 46 = 260
Clinton: 232 + 46 = 278



(Message edited by fb1 on November 25, 2016)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Friday, November 25, 2016 - 09:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

From Jill Stein's website (https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount):

quote:

Because of you, recounts in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are funded! Next up is Michigan.

Congratulations on meeting the recount costs for Wisconsin and Pennsylvania! Raising money to pay for the first two recounts so quickly is a miraculous feat and a tribute to the power of grassroots organizing.

Now that we have completed funding Wisconsin's recount (where we will file on Friday) and funding Pennsylvania's recount (due Monday), we will focus on raising the needed funds for Michigan's recount (due Wednesday). The breakdown of these costs is described below!

On November 23, the Stein/Baraka Green Party Campaign launched an effort to ensure the integrity of our elections. With your help, we are raising money to demand recounts in these three states where the data suggests a significant need to verify machine-counted vote totals.

In true grassroots fashion, we’re turning to you, the people, and not big-money corporate donors to make this happen.



According to her site, as of this moment they have raised $5,448,325.30.

FIVE AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS!

In two days? From "the people"? With a maximum donation amount (per her site) of $2700?

Bullshit.

One wonders which occurs first: civil war, or martial law...

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Saturday, November 26, 2016 - 06:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

According to her site, as of this moment they have raised $5,448,325.30.
If the right had raised that, the left would say that money should go to a good cause, and that the right shouldn't try to go against the will of the People.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Saturday, November 26, 2016 - 09:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)







Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bandm
Posted on Saturday, November 26, 2016 - 01:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=26 3&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time%20left%20until%20Obama% 20leaves%20office
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Saturday, November 26, 2016 - 02:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

WHERE IS THIS MONEY COMING FROM?!?
They are some rich alligators in that swamp
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alfau
Posted on Saturday, November 26, 2016 - 06:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

They are still trying to stop that galoot.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/donald-trump-jil l-stein-recount-hillary-clinton-2016-11
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ducbsa
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 05:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Some perspective:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/reco unt-freakout.php
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 09:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Stein is being used in the recount as a surrogate for Clinton, for several obvious reasons. Here's one of them:




(image source: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/11/26/hi llary-clinton-joins-recount-efforts-in-wisconsin-m ichigan-and-pennsylvania/)


And yet:

quote:

Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer announced plans to participate in vote recounts of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan...

...“We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states — Michigan — well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. “But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.”



^ Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11 -26/clinton-campaign-will-participate-in-stein-s-s tate-recounts


Yeah, sure.


Re: the "rich alligators," Stein raised over $5,000,000 for the recount in just over 48 hours, including OVER THANKSGIVING DAY. This would not normally be possible.

Consider that Stein only raised three point-something million dollars during her entire presidential campaign.

There's BIG money behind this recount, which ISN'T coming from grassroots donors.

And, quite obviously, Stein is being used as a surrogate for Clinton.

One has to ask:

1) Where's the money coming from?
2) What's the end game?

By the way, if Stein were president, THIS is the caliber of people we'd have running our country:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XgB5F2buwY


Dayum.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 09:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

1) Where's the money coming from?
The Clintons and George Soros, them some rich alligators right there
2) What's the end game?
Trump is out

Sorry if your questions are rhetorical


Dayum.
yeah....dayum....
and what with the mobile home wallpaper...?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 10:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

What's the end game?

And WHY is Stein waiting until the last possible second to ask for recounts?


quote:

Historic Recount Will Have To Move Quickly
By Patrick Marley and Bill Glauber, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 25, 2016

Wisconsin will begin a historic presidential recount next week and the state could risk losing its ability to have its 10 electoral votes counted if it doesn't meet key deadlines next month.

Hitting a Dec. 13 deadline could be particularly tricky if Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin's top election official said.

Stein...filed recount requests late Friday, the last day [she was] able to do so.

Stein is also planning to ask for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, which have deadlines next week.

Wisconsin's recount will likely begin late next week...said Michael Haas, administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Recounts will be done by county boards of canvassers, which will likely have to work nights and weekends, Haas said.

Wisconsin's last statewide recount was in 2011 for a state Supreme Court seat and the outcome did not change.

...That recount took more than a month. This one would have to happen more quickly because of a federal law that says states must complete presidential recounts within 35 days of the election to ensure their electoral votes are counted. This year, that's Dec. 13.

"You may potentially have the state electoral votes at stake if it doesn't get done by then," said Haas.

A lawyer with Stein's campaign has said it wants the recount done by hand. That would take longer and require a judge's order, Haas said.

Perhaps the most important deadline is Dec. 19, when electors around the country must meet to cast their Electoral College votes, said Edward Foley, an expert in election law at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.

"That is a hard deadline and if a state were to miss that deadline, it would be technically in jeopardy of not having its electoral votes counted," he said.

If the recount isn't complete by then, electors from Wisconsin could meet anyway and try to have their results sent to Congress by the time it counts the votes on Jan. 6, Foley said. Congress has wide latitude to decide how to count the states' electoral votes.

Political scientist Barry Burden, the director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said it would be extremely difficult to complete the recount on time. About twice as many votes were cast in the presidential election as the 2011 Supreme Court race.



Source, more: http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/electi ons/2016/11/25/recount-would-have-move-quickly/944 17686/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 10:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Sorry if your questions are rhetorical

Yup. : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ratbuell
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 01:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Easy.

She waited because it could nullify the state's votes when the recount isn't done on time.

In other words...she has no faith in the idea they'll "win" the state...but she wants to invalidate Trump's win, via late-date technicality. "If I can't have it (the state's electoral votes)...nobody can!"

...same process with the other states. Why not file all 3 states at once? Why ELSE wait until right at the deadline? Make 'em ALL late, make 'em ALL invalid.

(Message edited by ratbuell on November 27, 2016)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 01:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hand recounts are insane if you are looking for an accurate count. Humans simply don't perform well doing tedious things for hour/days at a time. Of course, if accuracy isn't the point...

Given that it's the electronic machines that are supposedly in question (which Michigan didn't even use BTW) How would you ever even do a hand count of an electronic vote? Well, it's obvious that the excuse for the recount isn't the issue. Given the cash being raised for lawyers, I'm going out on a limb and guessing that there will be piles and piles of legal motions to cripple the system. It's going to make the Bush/Gore election look straight forward. Funny how the left lectures about the right pulling this crap, but they are the authors of this sort of crap. I fear the Al Franken election was just a dry run.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Snacktoast
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 05:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Sure, having Trump out is Stein's endgame...but why? It's clear, since she's planning to file in only republican won states, what the endgame is.
Unless I'm mistaken (it's possible), and unless she was only politicking (very likely), did she not say that she was very much against Hillary in the White House?
The woman had to know that her campaign didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. Was it just an attempt to take votes from Trump, and when that was unsuccessful she comes home to roost with her lefty friends? I'm truly asking, since I know very little about her.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 05:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There are many reasons not to like The Republican Leaders. There are many reasons not to like Donald Trump. ( one reason to like him is the Republican Leaders hate him )

None of that really matters since none of that was mentioned during the campaign.

Instead it was a creation of lies and emotional appeals, hate & fear, propaganda & quarter truths made into total lies, that was the whole campaign against Trump.

If you watch the 24/7 "news cycle"....

You KNOW, from CNN & MSNBC & ABC & CBS & ETC. that Trump is a Nazi multi-phobe that will imprison any who oppose him. ( because all you believe, all you ever heard, are the lies, and you are so ignorant you don't know who the Nazis were... Socialists, btw. )

It only makes sense that you would oppose BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY, Trump the NAZI DEATH CAMP BRINGER!!!!!

The ultimate irony is that every attack on Trump, ( with the exception that he's a jerk ) is in reality and throughout history the real facts about the Leftists... not the running dog Capitalist Donald.

When Jimmie Carter ended Civil Defense and gave us FEMA, they began building "refugee centers" aka "concentration camps". Under Republican administrations the Lefties feared these and complained about the dire nature of them... Under Democrat administrations the Righties feared and complained.

With considerably more reason, given the history of Re-education, Concentration, Internment, and Death camps the world over ( including in the U.S. ) under Leftist regimes.

I bet you a burger that those camps will be a major part of the propaganda for the #HATE&PANIC crowd in the next few years.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 05:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_de mocrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Snacktoast
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 05:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think there is some merit to that article, Aesquire. Based on that logic, it clearly explains why they are waiting until the last day possible to file in each state.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 06:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I don't know if the article is correct, but it does make sense.

I'm just happy I made it through Thanksgiving without alienating all my relatives, and hope that things get better.

I also want a gyro copter like from the Original Mad Max movie, because things getting better is not the agenda of some very rich and very evil people.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zac4mac
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 09:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Autogyro
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Torquehd
Posted on Sunday, November 27, 2016 - 10:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'd never heard of an autogyro; this looks amazing!


Edit: Amazing concept. Take a glider and turn the fixed wings into rotary wings. I had to do a little research to understand it. Mind blowing.

(Message edited by torquehd on November 27, 2016)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 12:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"Autogiro" and "Gyrocopter" are both trademarks of De la Cierva, and Igor Bensen, respectively... ( Cierva Autogiro Company, Bensen Aircraft )

Other terms include gyroplane & autogyro, or just gyro.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogyro

The how they fly is interesting. The utility of the concept is impressive.

They fly nicely in higher winds than regular planes, and are capable of simply landing on a spot, safely and easily. Quite maneuverable, and has a broad speed range.


You burn more fuel for the same speed as a winged airplane, and there are limits on top speed, because, like a Helicopter, at some speed the retreating rotor blade stalls. Also take offs are not as short as landings, usually, depending on the type of system you use to pre-rotate the blades up to flying speed. With a small ultralight gyro you simply push the blades by hand to get them spinning, then use the wind from the propeller to spin them up, and finish spinning them up to speed by rolling down the runway, accelerating.

Several companies make Gyros in complete & kit form. Fun craft.

Plus, there's a version called the "hopper-copter" where you have a more complex control system and spin the blades at flat pitch with engine power up to faster than flying speed, disengage the power to the rotor, and pitch the blades to flying Angle. The gyro then leaps off the ground using the stored energy in the rotor blades, and transitions to forward flight... ( and if this sounds scary to you, you're probably sane ) Works, but it's complex and expensive. I'm unaware of any hopper types for sale in 2016.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6xjCUVuUzg



http://www.cartercopters.com/pav
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 12:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Other terms include badass!
If I had ever done that, I may have spent my spare time in the air rather than rippin asphalt
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 08:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Cool stuff, but please stay on topic.

FB
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 09:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Why? Isn't this an internet forum? Topics are supposed to drift.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 09:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

She waited because it could nullify the state's votes when the recount isn't done on time. -- Ratbuell

Well, it's obvious that the excuse for the recount isn't the issue. Given the cash being raised for lawyers, I'm going out on a limb and guessing that there will be piles and piles of legal motions to cripple the system. --Sifo

Sure, having Trump out is Stein's endgame...but why? It's clear, since she's planning to file in only republican won states, what the endgame is. --Snacktoast

As Brother Glitch pointed out above, my question...

quote:

What's the end game?



...is obviously rhetorical. As the left has said all along, ever since Trump announced his candidacy:

quote:

Trump will NEVER become president.



But: If they, the left, via Stein Hillary Clinton's surrogate (and, apparently, new BFF) is successful in "running out the clock" in MI, WI and PA and those states' EVs ultimately don't count, the EV tally then stands at Trump 260 and Clinton 232, and hence he still becomes our 45th president.

Right?

So for the sake of argument, in the above scenario what else may be at play to close this 28-point gap between the two and give Clinton the White House?

Would nullifying the EVs in PA, WI and MI, if it comes to that, sew enough chaos and doubt (whether real or imagined) in the integrity of the overall election results to provide a plausible excuse for, say, 29 "faithless" electors in other states?

I know what the end game is - keep Trump out of the White House.

And it's quite obvious that Stein and her people aren't actually the ones orchestrating this dog and pony show.

Inauguration day is a long way off. Is there another shoe (or two) waiting to drop?

I find it interesting that Trump chose Donald McGahn as Assistant to the President and White House Counsel.

quote:

Mr. McGahn has a distinguished legal career that spans two decades. Mr. McGahn served as general counsel for President-elect Trump’s campaign and currently on transition and will continue providing expert advice and counsel in the Trump-Pence Administration.

...Mr. McGahn served as a member of the FEC [for] five years, during which he served as both chairman and vice chairman.



(source: https://www.greatagain.gov/news/president-elect-do nald-j-trump-selects-kathleen-troia-%e2%80%9ckt%e2 %80%9d-mcfarland-serve-deputy-national.html


Although the Federal Election Commission (FEC) was founded to regulate the campaign finance legislation in the United States, I'm quite sure that Mr. McGahn is well-versed in all aspects of election law.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 09:47 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Why? Isn't this an internet forum? Topics are supposed to drift.

This thread is entitled "President-Elect Trump." Enough said.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 10:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Doesn't that mean "the apocalypse is nigh"?

It does according to the Fidel Castro lovers.

Which is the best recommendation I can think of for Donald. : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Electraglider_1997
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 10:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I'm all for a recount. What I really find ridiculous is that these folks campaign for 2 years but then the vote just has to be counted overnight. All votes should be on paper and then hand counted and it takes as long as that would take. No freaking computers. No hacking.
Another thing. When candidates debate on TV they should be able to use video to show where the other candidate said something that he/she is denying. That would keep these serial liars from denying what they clearly said. This would certainly keep candidates from claiming they said something or didn't say something. I'm absolutely sick of all the low down carrying on of the people that run for office.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fdl3
Posted on Monday, November 28, 2016 - 11:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

What's the end game?



Preventing Trump from becoming President? Sure.

The abolition of our Republic electoral college system in favor of a Democracy popular-vote/mob-rule system? Even better!
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration