| Author | Message | ||
     Sifo |
I do have to wonder what these idiot snowflakes think they are protesting. Trump hasn't even taken office yet. He hasn't even had a chance to do anything yet. So clearly it's not about an action Trump has taken as President. It does appear that they are protesting the process. I've not heard boo about election irregularities that would have helped Trump. Plenty to help Hillary, but not Trump. So I don't think the protests are about corruption that affected the democratic process. It does seem that they are protesting the democratic process itself. I guess they would actually prefer living in a dictatorship. Liberalism really is a mental disorder! | ||
| Fb1 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kDEaKQjD1w | ||
| Fb1 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex9ldUHSgjs | ||
| Fb1 |
I do have to wonder what these idiot snowflakes think they are protesting. My take is they feel that since Clinton won the popular vote (which I don't believe for a minute, but my research leads me to believe that the bad guys are cooking the books as we speak) that she was robbed of the presidency. One of Soros' .org's, I forget which one, has on online petition up and running, with over 300,000 signatures so far, demanding that the electoral college, come December 19th, do the right thing and actually confirm Clinton as our new president. That's a simplified explanation of what I've seen and read, but enough to get my point across. There's every indication and reason to believe that the protests are being organized and funded by the same folks who organized and funded the Trump protests during the campaign, i.e., the DNC, although you might just as well say the present federal government apparatus. I've seen several photos of one of the operatives exposed in the Project Veritas videos attending, and actively engaged in, at least one of the protests. And, true to form, the media dutifully fans the flames, up to and including outright, provably-false lies. More tinder! So I ask myself: What's the end game? I mean, Trump's already won, right? Well, maybe he has, maybe he hasn't, the way I'm seeing it. I see two end games at play: 1. Somehow, some way, overturn just enough electors to give the presidency to Clinton. 2. Scorched earth (in a damn frikkin' hurry; inauguration day rapidly approaches), to foment conditions warranting declaration of martial law. Just theories, and I continue to scour the 'net, trying to learn more, but a sane person, such as yourself, has to ask: What's the end game? | ||
| Wolfridgerider |
Commercial free Morning Joe with Michael Moore http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/michael-moo re-joins-wide-ranging-election-talk-806604867876 "over 90,000 people in Michigan that voted did NOT vote for president" | ||
| Alfau |
To make America so called "great again", He'll have to unite you all as a nation. Confucius say:- United they stand, divided they fall. (Let the reader use discernment) Blind Freddie can see you are definitely divided at the moment in your willingness to follow Tronald Dump. Weakened by divisive tactics. | ||
| Ferris_von_bueller |
We can't unite as a nation. Not going to happen unless one side capitulates. I have nothing in common with people that burn American flags, take a dump on a corner and then rub their feces all over a Trump picture or mobs of feral black youths who assault motorists and pedestrians because they are white. | ||
| Glitch |
To make America so called "great again", He'll have to unite you all as a nation. There's never been a president that has united everyone as a nation. Even during the revolution there were naysayers, and British supporters. All he has to do is work on doing what he said he was, and he'll turn out to a very popular (which as best as you can get to unifying the nation) president. This last election has already proved that unlike Aussies, Americans aren't push overs, we push back. (Message edited by glitch on November 11, 2016) | ||
| Court |
He creates jobs in Detroit and does ANYTHING for health care he'll be Sainted. He made his first great move today by excusing Chris Christie as leader of transition. If you're tainted you're out. Clean it up and come back and see me. | ||
| Glitch |
Trey Gowdy for AG! | ||
| Fb1 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqEddipbpkw | ||
| Fb1 |
Source: https://twitter.com/SheriffClarke/status/797064039 176273920/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw | ||
| Sifo |
What's the end game? As always... The acquisition of power. In the case of the progressives, through destroying the Republic that is the US. That last part has never been more clear. "over 90,000 people in Michigan that voted did NOT vote for president" Well, I'm certainly not going to spend my time watching a long interview with that POS, but I wonder what his point is about that statistic. I am wondering whats up with Michigan not finishing it's vote count yet. Seems odd. As for uniting the country... Just stop the divisive BS, and focus on making life better for all. Of course, the progressives will continue to be divisive, but while they are out of power, just do the right things for the country. We have an entire generation now that have no clue what a strong economy looks like. When they see the possibilities, the door is open to win over an entire generation. None of that is a prediction, but it would be a good road map. | ||
| Fb1 |
This is a brilliant smackdown of the lying MSM, using election data from none other than the leftist New York Times as the club. Awesome! Folks, the mainstream media, at the behest of their masters, is LYING to you when they say that whites won this election for Trump (actually, they're lying to you about pretty much everything). See for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUXSX3ZnpE Share this! | ||
| Wolfridgerider |
after a Friday night watching the Bill's (O"reilly and Maher) What if the president was decided by popular vote instead of the electoral college? The campaigns would be run knowing it was winner take all. How many more conservatives would vote in California, Oregon, Washington, New York, Minnesota.... How many more liberals would vote in Texas, Arizona, Kentucky, Tennessee... Would we get better candidates? Would they have to migrate to the middle to even have a chance? I'm tired of hearing "She won the popular vote"... How many more people would participate if they knew for a fact the vote could make a difference. I would hate to live in up state New York or rural Oregon knowing my vote would never change squat in the presidential election. I'm sure some Hillary supporters in Texas fill that way. What say you FB1? Your in Western Virginia that is pretty red but gets turned Blue due to all the folks in Eastern, VA. | ||
| Ducbsa |
Trump hasn't even taken office yet. He hasn't even had a chance to do anything yet. On the flip side, they thought that it was just dandy for Obama to get the Nobel Peace Prize before doing anything. | ||
| Gentleman_jon |
Why can't everyone just get along? That's the most important thing for me. Here an admirable citizen takes the first step in spreading the love, and the warmth. Please take a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNbF9PI9Gjo | ||
| Pwnzor |
| ||
| Gaesati |
Another outsider query, for many years I didn't understand the function of the electoral college. I always thought that election of the chief executive of the U.S. Was a direct democratic process to select a representative and responsible head of state. The electoral college seems to be a firewall which entitles each state to have an influence on the outcome. Firstly, by their numerical entitlement and secondly, by the way they choose to allocate their electoral votes. I suppose it means that passing the democratic hurdle is one part of the election but protecting the sovereignty of the states is another. Seems like a good system to me. | ||
| Reepicheep |
I think you are right Gaesati. If I understand correctly, I think states today could decide to apportion their electoral votes proportionately by candidate. All decided not too, because by concentrating on a winner take all strategy, they leverage their power better. If it's just a split, candidates can ignore them because their time won't really change anything, they will get 2 of 5 votes or 3 of 5 votes, so, meh, go to Florida instead and get 12 votes instead of 0 votes. So the electoral college is a way for states to get leverage with candidates. And good for the citizens in the state, in that while they may not get the candiate they wan't, they make their state stronger either way. | ||
| Court |
>>>I think states today could decide to apportion their electoral votes proportionately by candidate.
| ||
| Aesquire |
Simply, without the firewall of the Electoral college just the few high population states would determine the winner. Currently New York & California would be all you'd need. If you look at the color coded by county map of the vote you see that the majority of the power sits in the urban centers. Urban centers have become the home of the leftist/socialist taking class, on purpose. The D's dominate that subset. In New York the counties that didn't vote for the current Governor pretty much didn't get their share of road repair & other money. To punish them for their disobedience. It's a microcosm of the rest of the country. One urban area is Capitol City and the rest give tribute. Looked at functionally, the urban welfare communities are parasitic on the productive whole. However as the urban parasite culture consumes the productivity the culture is metastasizing into the rest of society. Then it all grinds to a halt. Which is why real unemployment is up each year the last nine. | ||
| Hughlysses |
Good video explaining the reasons for the Electoral College: | ||
| Court |
Great video | ||
| Sifo |
| ||
| Ducxl |
It would be nice to see discussions (QB threads)start regarding Trumps policies and how he may achieve them.I'm wondering HOW we can fix Healthcare.Unfortunately,do to recent unemployment we find ourselves without Health insurance.And for me to buy it NOW is prohibitively expensive at over 2K/month.Re-employed tomorrow but not eligible for benefits for 90 days | ||
| Blake |
That'd be interesting Duc. I'm game.  | ||
| Blake |
What do you think FB? I've been a Magyn Kelly fan for a long long time. She got a bug for Trump for sure, but she is as objective as I've seen in her hard nosed confrontation of those in power. Watch to the end... https://youtu.be/qWFBO04Nmys | ||
| Ferris_von_bueller |
She's shopping for a job | ||
| Hootowl |
I disagree. We do NOT all share the same core values. |
