They don't accept the fact, they ARE the fact. They ARE the people being used, willingly. They are the pieces of sh*t. Or they take the orders from them. Same same.
Justified in their minds... to Stop The Evil Trump.
If Jeb was running, or Ted, or Harry Potter, the Only difference would be the name on the lies and attacks.
Jesus Christ would be mocked as an alcoholic, ( That Wine thing ) and anti Union, ( That bread wasn't Union baked, was it? ) There'd be front page pics of him hanging out with Prostitutes.
Worst of all, the AMA would condemn him for practicing medicine without a license. How DARE he say he cured a Leper?
And he's Pro- adultery. That cast the first stone business. Interfering with Justice. Anti-police.
I can see the interviews. "He laid his hands upon me without permission/Cut/ because I was blind and he cured me. Bless Him!"
New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" by Tyler Durden Oct 23, 2016 11:50 PM
Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats...[W]hile democrats may enjoy a slight registration advantage of a couple of points, it is nowhere near the 9 points reflected in this latest poll.
Meanwhile, we also pointed out that with huge variances in preference across demographics one can easily "rig" a poll by over-indexing to one group vs. another...Moreover, the pollsters don't provide data on the demographic mix of their polls which makes it impossible to "fact check" the bias...convenient.
Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are "adjusted", we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in detail, exactly how to "manufacture" the desired data. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling":
[redacted, see source article - FB]
...And that's how you manufacture a 12-point lead for your chosen candidate and effectively chill the vote of your opposition.
It just gets better and better . . . . surprise anyone that the Clinton's kinda shuffled a cool $500,000 to the wife of the FBI Agent investigating the e-mails?
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton confidant, helped steer $675,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an FBI official who went on to lead the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email system, according to a report.
The political action committee of McAuliffe, the Clinton loyalist, gave $467,500 to the state Senate campaign of the wife of Andrew McCabe, who is now deputy director of the FBI, according to the Wall Street Journal.
The report states Jill McCabe received an additional $207,788 from the Virginia Democratic Party, which is heavily influenced by McAuliffe.
The money directed by McAuliffe began flowing two months after the FBI investigation into Clinton began in July 2015. Around that time, the candidate’s husband was promoted from running the Washington field office for the FBI to the No. 3 position at the bureau.
Within a year, McCabe was promoted to deputy director, the second-highest position in the bureau.
In a statement to the Journal, the FBI said McCabe “played no role, attended no events, and did not participate in fundraising or support of any kind. Months after the completion of her campaign, then-Associate Deputy Director McCabe was promoted to Deputy, where, in that position, he assumed for the first time, an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails.”
The governor’s office claimed the FBI’s McCabe met the governor only once — on March 7, 2015, when McAuliffe persuaded Jill McCabe to run.
The 2015 Virginia state Senate run — her first attempt to gain public office — was unsuccessful as she lost to the incumbent Republican.
McAuliffe “supported Jill McCabe because he believed she would be a good state senator. This is a customary practice for Virginia governors … Any insinuation that his support was tied to anything other than his desire to elect candidates who would help pass his agenda is ridiculous,” a spokesman for the Virginia governor told the Journal.
McAuliffe has been a longtime backer of the Clintons, even serving as Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair in 2008.
Exactly why the ethics rules say "there must not be an appearance of impropriety or conflict of interest".
It's a good rule. What a shame we don't follow it. It hurts and limits people in public service. I appreciate this sacrifice, but we must demand and enforce it.
Are, roughly half of our country going to vote for a candidate, that actually paid people do dress in duck costumes, and try to disrupt their opponents rallies? How in the hell did the US sink so low? Serious question! I'm not clear if we are still swirling around the bowl, or have entered the drain at this point.
Cult of personality. Bill was a charming rouge. And cleverly done lies meant that it didn't matter he committed sexual misconduct. ( Boss doing underling ) probably sexual harassment ( threats & indecent exposure & bad touch..... ) and allegedly rape.
Hillary stood by her cheating man she deserves anything he owes her & all criticism is lies. ( never mind that to believe this is to believe Bill is scum. But only in disconnecting context. The same person still loves Bill. )
And there are folk that gush full fanboy for Trump.
Unlike the Hillary and Bill fans they admit Donald is not a God..... but point out he's an angel in comparison to Hillary.
THE WIKILEAKS LIST: At Least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting with and/or Coordinating Offline with Top Hillary Advisors By Jim Hoft, Oct. 24, 2016
A few of the “journalists” meeting offline with Hillary advisers
Thanks to Wikileaks we now know that at least 65 mainstream reporters were working closely with the Clinton campaign this election year. They were invited to top elitist dinners with Hillary Campaign Chairman John Podesta or Chief Campaign strategist Joel Benenson.
...As previously reported— At least 38 top national reporters attended a different dinner at John Podesta’s house in April 2015.
...We also know that Politico’s chief political correspondent Glenn Thrush was sending the Hillary campaign articles for their review before publishing.
We know CNBC and New York Times reporter John Harwood was working with the Clinton campaign to help Hillary.
So given the fact that Hillary has been caught, involved in plans to pit citizens against citizens, with the intended out come being violence, in an effort to promote her own power, how can anyone support this? Is there really any way that she can claim the moral authority to rule our country? She is clearly a leader who cares little for the people she is supposed to represent, on either side of the political compass. This is the kind of crap that I might expect from the worst dirt bag leaders of third world countries. To see this as a real possibility in the US turns my stomach. I'd really love to hear from the progressives on this board about how they feel about this. It seems all they can do is hurl ad hominem attacks though. Pretty much playing it exactly as Hillary would want it. Out country is in a sad place.
I feel so sorry for the honorable F.B.I. Agents who have been sucked into this and surely made to lie, cover-up and ignore evidence. This is so contrary to the high opinion I have held of them since I was a child. I've never seen so many folks forget so much . . so many folks invoke the 5th (very rare for federal employees who can invoke the 5th to prevent prosecution but generally still loose their job as a result) . . . or tell so many poorly thought out tales . . . the entire thing takes place at about the cognitive level of a kid who's stolen a cookie.
Shame.
I think we are royally screwed if this women prevails.
quote:
Paul Sperry
For months now, we’ve been told that Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 missing emails were permanently erased and destroyed beyond recovery. But newly released FBI notes strongly suggest they still exist in several locations — and they could be recovered, if only someone would impanel a grand jury and seize them.
In a May interview with FBI agents, an executive with the Denver contractor that maintained Clinton’s private server revealed that an underling didn’t bleach-clean all her subpoenaed emails, just ones he stored in a data file he used to transfer the emails from the server to Clinton’s aides, who in turn sorted them for delivery to Congress.
The Platte River Networks executive, whose name was redacted from the interview report, said PRN tech Paul Combetta “created a ‘vehicle’ to transfer email files from the live mailboxes of [Clinton Executive Services Corp.] email accounts [and] then later used BleachBit software to shred the ‘vehicle,’ but the email content still existed in the live email accounts.”
Unless one of Clinton’s aides had the capability to log in to the PRN server as an administrator and remove a mailbox, her archived mailboxes more than likely still reside somewhere in that system. And they may also materialize on an internal “shared drive” that PRN created to control access to the Clinton email accounts among PRN employees. PRN has been under FBI order to preserve all emails and other evidence since the start of its investigation last year.
Clinton’s missing “personal” emails may also be captured on a Google server. According to FBI notes, Combetta “transferred all of the Clinton email content to a personal Google email address he created.” Only the FBI never subpoenaed Google to find out.
The FBI documents also reveal that Hillary’s server was mirrored on a cloud server in Pennsylvania maintained by Datto Inc., a tech firm that performs cloud-to-cloud data protection.
When PRN contracted with Datto, it requested that Hillary’s server be backed up locally and privately. But the techs forgot to order the private node, and they sent the server backup data “remotely to Datto’s secure cloud and not to a local private node.” The FBI never subpoenaed Datto’s server, either.
Then there’s the laptop Combetta loaded with the Clinton email archive and allegedly shipped back to a Clinton aide in Washington, who claims it got “lost” in the mail. Not so fast: The latest FBI document dump includes a series of interviews with an unidentified former “special assistant” to Clinton at the State Department who said the elusive Apple MacBook laptop was actually “shipped to the Clinton Foundation in New York City.”
But in a June follow-up interview, FBI agents inexplicably left it up to this critical witness to “inquire about the shipment” with the foundation’s mailroom manager, who works in Rockefeller Center. The FBI still does not have the laptop in its possession.
It turns out that investigators also know the whereabouts of the original Apple server Clinton used in her first two months in office. Recovering that equipment is critical because it contains a mass of unseen emails from Jan. 21, 2009, to March 18, 2009 — a critical period in Clinton’s tenure at State. Witnesses say the equipment was not discarded, as first believed, but “repurposed” as a “work station” used by staff in Clinton’s Chappaqua residence.
Yet the FBI says it “was unable to obtain the original Apple server for a forensic review.” Instead of seizing it, the agency has taken Clinton’s aides’ and lawyers’ word that the server’s bereft of relevant emails. In fact, the agency confesses on Page 27 of its 47-page investigative case summary that it failed to recover other equipment and data as well: “The FBI’s inability to recover all server equipment and the lack of complete server log data for the relevant time period limited the FBI’s forensic analysis of the server systems. As a result, FBI cyber analysis relied, in large part, on witness statements.”
Congressional investigators say FBI Director James Comey in his year-long “investigation” didn’t even bother to send agents to search Clinton’s homes in Chappaqua or Washington, DC. Nor did he dispatch them to the offices of the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Executive Services Corp. in New York City.
“The Clinton residences and other locations should have been treated like any other criminal investigation — with federal grand jury subpoenas or search warrants issued by judges and served in the middle of the night,” said veteran FBI special agent Michael M. Biasello, who worked criminal cases out of New York and other field offices for 27 years.
“Never — I repeat, never — in my career have I or any FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case without the use of a federal grand jury, grand jury subpoenas or search warrants,” he said. “It’s disgraceful they weren’t used in this case.”
The most damning evidence against Clinton may never have been actually destroyed. It was simply left untouched by the FBI.
Paul Sperry, a former DC bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily and Hoover Institution media fellow, is author of “Infiltration.” Sperry@SperryFiles.com
Hard for me to believe this, but my wife spoke to her brother today. He's as progressive as they come. He actually said that he can't bring himself to vote for the Hilldabeast. He's sitting this one out. Who knows, perhaps there will be a flood of progressives that actually have a hard time dealing with the reality of their religion, as it gets laid out in its full glory in the full light of day. Still making no predictions, but I feel like I have a slight glimmer of hope.
