| Author | Message | ||
     86129squids |
Just did my regular scan at MC Daily online, check THIS out... | ||
| Macbuell |
Probably just me, but I don't get the need to put a big, heavy 6 cylinder in a bike given the awesome power you can get out of a 4 cylinder these days. | ||
| Crusty |
People use to say that about four cylinder motorcycles vs twins. Nice CGI, Not what I want in a bike, but pretty interesting, nevertheless. | ||
| Jaimec |
Q: Why do mountain climbers climb mountains? A: Because they CAN.  | ||
| Sifo |
Probably just me, but I don't get the need to put a big, heavy 6 cylinder in a bike given the awesome power you can get out of a 4 cylinder these days. Not just you. I could kind of understand it in a heavyweight touring bike. In anything on the sport side of Sport-Touring, it just doesn't appeal to me at all. My 1050 Sprint ST would scoot up to the top of Rocky Mountain passes while heavily loaded with great ease. I'm not sure what class of bike this is supposed to fit into. Sport-Sumo? | ||
| Teeps |
Jaimec Posted on Wednesday, October 19, 2016 - A: Because they CAN. INDEED! (Message edited by teeps on October 19, 2016) | ||
| 86129squids |
There are several ways to look at this thing. To me, sure it's eye candy all over, and yes it's a tad porky, in the stratosphere for $$$. Calling Leno... What Motus has done is adequate and sufficient.  I'd like to see a customized Triumph Rocket III up against it, 3 vs. 6! | ||
| Zac4mac |
(Message edited by zac4mac on October 20, 2016) | ||
| Natexlh1000 |
That rendering makes it look like more of a small car engine. I'll bet one of those would fit nicely in a "smart car" Or a Morgan three wheeler! |
