| Author | Message | ||
     Two_seasons |
George Grant wrote a book about Sanger back in the 80's. Sanger did advocate for the elimination of the Black race. She just said it differently than Hitler did about the Jews. Today, when we talk about the teachings of Alinsky, we must remember that he advocated for the progressive "win at any cost" persuasion. The only way to do that is to lie about everything that comes out of their heads. There are few Patriots among us that will enter gov't, education, science. We have lost the argument at these levels because we are too lazy to engage those around us that lie. We'd rather "preach" to the choir! It's far less stressful, isn't it? BadWeb is an excellent forum for "thought share". We must exercise caution that it is not here where we remain with the truth. Patriots must engage at every level, else "we the people", as defined in our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, perish. | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/do nald_trump_is_right_to_think_that_something_is_ver y_fishy_about_the_vincent_foster_death.html Of course, None of this has anything to do with Ms. Rodham. She has an alibi for the time in question. The alleged murder, er, suicide weapon was a .38 revolver who's last legal paperwork was in the late 1930's. I've not seen the autopsy report, or verification as to the actual chambering of the alleged revolver. ( my guess is .38 Long Colt or the equally wimpy .38 S&W. Not S&W Special ) it is known that the revolver was not one registered to the deceased, who had a carry permit for Washington D.C, as befits a high status lawyer.... but not us peasants. In any case, nothing to see here, move along. | ||
| Hughlysses |
I remember G. Gordon Liddy (for what that's worth), when he had a radio show WAY back when, talked about this. IIRC, he said he believed Foster and Hillary had had an affair. She broke it off, he was despondent and committed suicide in the White House. The Clintons had him removed from the property and placed where he was found to keep them clear of the scandal. I remember the most suspicious thing he mentioned was that Foster was found with a gunshot to the head and the gun still in his hand. According to Liddy, once a bullet goes through your brain, you immediately lose all muscle control. A suicide victim is never found still holding the gun. This explanation seems to make a lot of sense. (Message edited by Hughlysses on May 31, 2016) (Message edited by Hughlysses on May 31, 2016) | ||
| Sifo |
  | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436052/hilla ry-clinton-email-scandal-inspector-general-justice -department-report-george-costanza | ||
| Reepicheep |
Epic Irony... http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/bryan-paglia no-fifth-amendment-223796 Basically, the guy that set up a private email server at the direction of the secretary of state is refusing to allow video to be made of his testimony because he doesn't think the video can be kept from being stolen or leaked if it is created and stored on IT systems. He was fine with state secrets on an amateur hour server in Hillary's bathroom, that's fine. But by God don't make a video of him testifying that he refuses to testify because he believes testifying will incriminate himself. Great group of selfless leaders, these. | ||
| Hughlysses |
I'm still flummoxed at the lawyer who was Hillary's chief of staff when Hillary was Secretary of State. This lawyer has since served as Hillary's private lawyer, and she now invokes lawyer-client privilege to avoid testifying about things that happened before she was Hillary's lawyer because she was later Hillary's lawyer and talked about these things. Of course her serving as Hillary's lawyer is apparently clearly in violation of whatever ethics rules lawyers allegedly follow. | ||
| Reepicheep |
If you know you are going to commit crimes, the first thing you do is make sure it is all planned and discussed under attorney client privilege... | ||
| Hootowl |
Doesn't that make the lawyer an accomplice? | ||
| Reepicheep |
Yes. But it makes that fact much less easily discoverable, and much harder to prove when it is discovered (hey, I was just advising the client on legality, and because I was their lawyer I am not always legally obligated to report their crime!). http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/may_vs_ must/ | ||
| Bandm |
 | ||
| Hughlysses |
If you know you are going to commit crimes, the first thing you do is make sure it is all planned and discussed under attorney client privilege... They went one better than this: Hillary committed the crime, this lady who was not her lawyer at the time knew about it, then after Hillary was no longer Secretary of State, Hillary hired this lady as her lawyer. They've (apparently) since discussed the acts in question and the lawyer now claims she can't talk about them because of "after the fact" attorney-client privilege. Apparently ethics rules state that a lawyer is never supposed to put themselves in this position, but I'm sure that just applies to peons like us. | ||
| Aesquire |
Bottom line. Destroyed 32,000+ government documents. Claims the destroyed government documents were private mail mostly about yoga class and her daughter's wedding. She can claim they were anything since they no longer exist and f-u. Except some were recovered and were not yoga related but were in fact government business. If Hillary gets a pass then rule of law is over. She has lied continuously on this subject and pretty much everything else in her goblin existence for her entire life. And left a trail of "suicides" & minions in prison. I can document this. But CNN never will. ( unless I win the power ball & buy them. ) | ||
| Sifo |
Remember when "the coverup is worse than the crime"? If that standard were ever applied to the Clinton's, they would need to be drawn and quartered! | ||
| Reepicheep |
It takes the media to protect a country from the government. Unfortunately, our media only feels the need to protect the country from conservatives, Christians, and Republicans. And don't get me wrong, I support them shining a light in places where these groups would seek to interfere with the constitutional rights of others. But it unbalances the playing field when the media decides the rules apply differently to liberals, Democrats, minorities, Muslims, whatever. Or basically applies no rules, because, you know, it's the idealized (but never realized) shared aspirations and intent that matters, not the methods. | ||
| Court |
I just watched her speech. She lacks credibility. She whined on and on about stuff Trump did years ago .... About the time the Clintons were cozying up to him for $$$ .... and shared nothing more than drivel akin to a playground bully. She's floundering. She passed her prime, in many ways, about the time Obama made, or started making, a fool of her. I'm no Trump fan but Hillary has clearly had the laws of the land bend and battered to suit her behavior. She's eroded respect for American laws. She is embarrassing. | ||
| Hugie03flhr |
Killary is pathetic. She's about to be indicted and the audacity to mention the military makes me sick. 99.9% of the military would rather take orders from Trump than Killary . At least Trump won't leave our soldiers to die! | ||
| Sifo |
   | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/hi llarys_potential_email_felonies.html | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Court |
The irony is not lost on me . . . giving a speech on income inequality in a . . .
| ||
| Torquehd |
"The Armani jacket wasnt irony, it was dry cleany" -Hillary Clinton | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Sifo |
 | ||
| Aesquire |
https://pjmedia.com/michaelledeen/2016/06/05/what- is-hillary-hiding/?singlepage=true | ||
| Aesquire |
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-26/hillary-c lintons-state-department-approved-165-billion-arms -deals-clinton-foundation As many have said, If this person is not prosecuted, there is no such thing as rule of law. We are back in the dark ages where the aristocracy is above the petty laws that apply to the peasants. | ||
| Hootowl |
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/08/clinton -says-email-scandal-fbi-probe-absolutely-wont-be-g eneral-election-problems.html "Clinton said she previously declined to talk to investigators about the email issue because “what they wanted to ask, we'd already talked about … in the public arena." In other words, you don't want to have to repeat yourself. Under oath. | ||
| Xdigitalx |
How can the president of the u.s. endorse a person that is being investigated by his own administration and the fbi? Is that all she needs to get off scot-free? | ||
| Aesquire |
Having your country's dictator on your side is all she needs in a third world country. I'm still anticipating a last minute double cross. Right after the convention? | ||
| Hootowl |
They need to appoint a special prosecutor. There is an inherent conflict of interest. |
