Obama has driven Egyptian President Al-Sisi into the waiting arms of Russia and has destroyed 40 years of American diplomacy. Go look it up yourself. Obama embraced Moursi and the muslim brotherhood. It gets sicker and sicker.
Obama can not possibly be this stupid, therefore he must be deliberately destroying The United States of America.
Did anyone know ISIS was as bad as reports are saying??. If so, why did we wait so long for a few bomb strikes?? Or more?? Seriously...I mean..., is Pelosi in command??? I mean..., do we have to see what happens first, before we can get involved ...away from the fog of the controversy?!?!?! There is no room on this planet for isis wackjobs. After seeing the kid with the head... IMHO, there is nothing left to talk about. (500lb bombs- action speaks louder then words)
I read an article where an army consultant, who knows both sides stated that Iraqis have weapons but not enough heart. Isis have both. I think...America has no heart (for this Iraqi problem) and they (isis) count on it but also do not care either way because if we fight again, they will try for unity of all muslins around the world to fight back.
Make no mistake. The longer The United States of America waffles about ISIS, the bigger the resulting war. War is coming regardless that the Progressives and the Obama sycophants bleat otherwise.
ISIS dirty bombs smuggled in from Obama's open Southern border that simultaneously explode at LAX and Times Square will cause a global conflagration.
I've been more worried about a Mall hit. Some "gun free zone" with minimal security and lots of children for hostages.
There is no limit on travel inside America, not even the current open borders in the EU come close to the ability to go from the Mexican border to Mall of America in Minnesota.
Not counting AQ's one genius plot in 2001 with airliners, in the past attacks in the US have been low funding, low manpower bombing attacks ( Boston, NYC ).
It's pretty obvious with the current regimes border policy there is no shortage of manpower available for an attack like the one in Nairobi Kenya.
Since I tend toward the Jacksonian in these things, I'd bomb the daylights out of ISIS and use hit and run raids to support the Kurds.
I can only predict foolish waste of life to no good end from this regime. I hope I'm wrong. I really do.
Seeing the carnage with not cause them to come around. They will apologize to the Islamic community and say that the attacks are the result of the ugly American conservatives not respecting Islam.
The Scandal That Matters More Than All Others – Catherine Engelbrecht Updates Posted on August 13, 2014 by sundance
Of all the various “scandals” that emanate from the current administration the single most alarming, and by consequence the single most dangerous, stem from the DOJ weaponizing the IRS. Every single known fact points to a singular logical conclusion.
quote:
Catherine Engelbrecht Published on Aug 13, 2014
True the Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht discusses the ongoing IRS targeting scandal and "lost" Lois Lerner emails.
The Conservative Treehouse has done a superb job of investigating and documenting the various scandals that plague the 0bama administration, including a wealth of information regarding Benghazi. CTH is what true investigative journalism actually looks like.
Kudos to Catherine Engelbrecht and Judicial Watch for continuing to shine light on the cockroaches presently infesting the White House and the Department of Justice.
"Hello, I'm Tom Hanks, and I want Barack 0bama to be the next president of our country...My support for 0bama...is because of his character and vision...He has the integrity and inspiration to unify us...I want the president of my country to embody the America I have been waiting for, one where leaders address challenges with candor, and truth is their basis for policy."
If you are a public figure, and you use that public power to come out for a candidate, you should have some level of accountability for that candidates performance.
Not in that you should be personally responsible if the guy turned out to be a corrupt liar, but at you should have to publicly answer for your bad advice and explain your current perspectives. That is what the media should be pursuing. Instead, we have a relentless pursuit of upskirt shots of celebrities getting into cars.
If that's what the media wants to pursue, that's their business, but I don't want to consume it, and if that's all they are going to do they should be stripped of the special constitutional protections they were given in their role to keep government transparent and hold government accountable. They aren't doing their job equitably (they do pretty good for the people on the right, they utterly fail for people on the left).
Time for some federally mandated equal opportunity act corrections in the media... hiring quotas for conservatives.
It's time for the House Dems to figure out that they are little more than BO's useful idiots. No need to include them in strategy when he doesn't have any plans of needing them for his strategy. OR... BO is just an idiot in way over his head and really has no leadership ability. Personally, I favor a third possibility that is a blending of both of the above.
This a-hole simply does not know that the executive would keep his mouth shut and not prejudice the situation. Nero-Obama is a danger to The United States of America.
I wonder what Tom would say about the pResident today.
Great question. At the time we didn't know 0bama like we know him today. That said, four years later Hanks lent his voice (and thus his endorsement) to this:
They [the media] aren't doing their job equitably (they do pretty good for the people on the rightleft, they utterly fail for people on the leftright).
Andrew Breitbart used to say, "The media is EVERYTHING." Very true, and the White House controls every major media outlet except Fox News.
The media in your pocket is a powerful tool, and the White House has done a masterful job of controlling the media narrative during 0bama's tenure. I wonder which will reach the finish line first: 0bama, or the truth?
Sad thing is, it's passive for the most part. WH doesn't have to do anything other than let the leftie press do what it normally does: Vilify conservatives and explain away the left's insanity via distortions, lies, and selective reporting. For an example, you need look no further than the sudden lack of body count reporting in January 2008. Not to mention the near silence about the serial scandals that then ensued. OK, I guess I mentioned it.
I don't agree that it's mostly passive, but I agree with the rest of your comment.
The media gang-rape of Sarah Palin in '08 was very much a collaborative, centrally-directed effort, IMO. Same with the media gang-tackle of Romney in '12, particularly so with Romney, because he and Ryan represented a real threat to unseat 0bama.
I see a real conflict of interest with the nepotism going on between CBS News and the White House, and pretty much lost in all the other scandals is the recent DOJ-directed aggression towards the media, in particular Fox News. Here's one link; there's plenty more out there.