G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archive through September 07, 2021 » Former President 0. » Archive through February 22, 2013 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2013 - 01:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

True, but then, none of those Marines would have been in a position to assist the President with his deficiencies. They probably would have been told to stay in their own pay grade had they tried.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2013 - 04:21 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"Uncle Joe" Stalin
"Papa Barry" Obama

The cult of personality continues. Hollyweird wants us to revere Obama as a father figure.

meh- there are a long list of reasons I don't talk to most of my family.
Careful what you wish for Barry.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2013 - 09:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I've read spy novels for years, they are a favorite of my Father's, and I read James Bond when I was 6. Yep, all of them, even before I knew why Octopussy was funny. ( I admit Dad has some issues when I asked questions about things in the books... )

A common theme is the President having a secret team, or solo super agent, that eliminates the most dangerous and unreachable evil overlord types. Makes for fun fiction. Sure, in the novels it's great when the superspy breaks all the rules and gets the bad guy and often the girl. ( although they usually kill her off so the hero has no emotional commitments for the next book )

Tv, movies, even police dramas, breaking the rules to catch the uncatchable, stop the unstoppable, and save the day.... it's the meme.

Sometimes you have to, to save the day, we, as a people, brought up on bad dramas, buy that.

But when the rules are publicly thrown out, when the Secretary doesn't disavow the actions of a secret team, but someone leaks a memo FROM THE SECRETARY'S OFFICE detailing how they just plan to kill anyone they want, just on suspicion, no court, no judge, no evidence, not even a clear and present danger ( the magic catch phrase that allows breaking the rules, temporarily ) It is a little bit scary.

A lot of people bitched up a storm on the torture of 3 guys. Really bad guys, BTW. Proven, hard core, evil bastards, really. You can argue that waterboarding isn't torture, But if it isn't, why did it work to break these 3 bad a$$es? ( hint, waterboarding really is torture. Doesn't leave scars like the fingernail thing, they are deeper. )

Yep, a lot of people bitched. Obama bitched. Obama Promised the world he would not allow it. He does. Just like Clinton, he outsources it.

There's a horrible tendency to approve of bad/illegal/emergency actions from "your" guy and disapprove for the other. That's short sighted and destructive. Also very stupid.

People who bitched about the Patriot act, are silent when the President Brags about ordering the murders of the bad guys. Well, you say, that's what we expect out of those guys, they are hypocrites. True, they are. Better look in the mirror. What did you approve of from "your" guy that "their" guy doing is scary?

Think hard on that one, and think 3 times before jumping on the bandwagon next time ( and there is ALWAYS a next time ) some temporary increase in power/loss of freedom is asked for in the name of "security" or "safety", or, as always, "the children".

But what the heck? So the President has a kill list, an enemies list, a habit of demonizing anyone who disagrees with him, and now has taken onto himself the power to order the murder of anyone he wants.

NO big deal. It's not like YOU are a terrorist, or would find yourself in the crosshairs by some nice fellow in Virginia. You are safe. It's not like anyones going to take your guns away, or violate the First Amendment, right?

Right?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/world/middleeast /with-brennan-pick-a-light-on-drone-strikes-hazard s.html

There's a reason assassination as a means of social change is a bad thing. You never know what you are going to get. Who expected some crappy archduke getting killed would start a War that killed 18 million people. And the result did NOT give the assassins the desired result.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, February 06, 2013 - 11:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

On a lighter note, I may have to admire Obama's cool in the N Korean provocation crisis. I don't disagree with him on everything. Sometimes his usual schtick of cool, buzzwords & bull is perfect for the day.

http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?cont ent_id=25588503
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fahren
Posted on Thursday, February 07, 2013 - 09:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Aesquire, I find myself aligned with far too many of your posts. It makes me think of
National Brotherhood Week: :- )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Thursday, February 07, 2013 - 10:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

NO big deal. It's not like YOU are a terrorist, or would find yourself in the crosshairs by some nice fellow in Virginia. You are safe. It's not like anyones going to take your guns away, or violate the First Amendment, right?

Or you could simply be seated at the same outdoor cafe as the "terrorist" that is the target of the drone bombing right on Main St., USA. It's "legal, ethical, and wise"!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Thursday, February 07, 2013 - 07:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/07/piers-morgan-fa n-goes-on-shooting-rampage-killing-three/

Big Obama fan too. I object though, I never called Barack any of those things... I DID question all those things, but so did Hillary.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Iamike
Posted on Thursday, February 07, 2013 - 10:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

And this poor hero (or sap) is paying for O's need for legibilty as a candidate.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/02/07/hope-fades -for-family-hero-doctor-jailed-in-pakistan-after-h elping-us-nail-bin/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, February 08, 2013 - 08:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.soopermexican.com/2013/02/07/news-media -scrub-cop-murderers-manifesto-of-pro-obama-pro-hi llary-loved-msnbc-pro-gay-and-anti-gun-comments/

Anybody surprised?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, February 08, 2013 - 09:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/05/1685553 9-judge-jury-and-executioner-legal-experts-fear-im plications-of-white-house-drone-memo

“If you believe the president has the power to order U.S. citizens executed far from any battlefield with no charges or trial, then it’s truly hard to conceive of any asserted power you would find objectionable,”

Well said.

Some will say it is ok for the President to use deadly force to defend the Country.

Yes...but.

For the last 200 years, excepting Lincoln jailing some Newspaper guys, and FDR sending thousands of Japanese ethnicity to concentration camps, ( where some people died of disease and hard conditions ) We generally don't go for the President having a secret "hit list" of American Citizens he gets to kill at whim. ( or at suspicion, I have a hard time telling the difference )

Just as I have sympathy for the Prez in having to deal with Congress, ( so, wisely he doesn't, as much as possible, and a little bit pregnant more ) I have sympathy with the desire to just end the threat of a would be mass murderer. It's got to be tempting.

It always has been. I suppose there are some historic examples of a "leader" who claimed & used such power in an emergency that then did not use it to keep power or eliminate his enemies. I just can't think of one. Anyone?

Even Lincoln, in his over reach of power didn't just kill newspaper editors when they supported succession or disagreed with him. And to be fair, Obama hasn't either.... just had a few people jailed....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Two_seasons
Posted on Friday, February 08, 2013 - 09:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

was watching O'Reilly tonight and Gutfeld and McGurk were on there.

They were talking about the photo of Obama and the shotgun.

McGurk says "that photo is about as believable as seeing a photo of Chris Christie on a treadmill with a sweatband on"

I almost blew my beer out my nose!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Saturday, February 09, 2013 - 06:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All is not depressing...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/02/07/ dr_benjamin_carson_addresses_national_prayer_break fast_criticizes_obamacare.html

Some still speak truth to power. ( I'm certain the "media" will villify this guy. )

It's all about public perception with Obama. The Unaffordable Health Care Act publicity push had the White house sticking white doctor coats on a batch of doctors visiting the White House.

The 5 minutes Obama spent "skeet shooting" with the Marines was pure theater. I doubt he even touched a shotgun at that time. ( and witnesses say he left ASAP being very uncomfortable in that setting.... surrounded by competent sheepdog type people. )

There is no proof that Obama has ever fired a shotgun other than that ONE time in the picture taken only to prove he held one in his hands.... And if he's like most people, shooting a 12 ga. shotgun wrong gave him feedback he didn't like. I doubt you'd ever get him to shoot one again. He's that kind of wimp. ( Golf, yes, Personal trainer, sure! Gotta have photo abs! )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Sunday, February 10, 2013 - 07:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I cannot watch that enough ; may there be hope yet.

on another note
Mississippi is ramping up their drive for secession
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Sunday, February 10, 2013 - 10:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Looks like the Commander in Chief doesn't even trust the Marines he commands to not shoot him. They had to remove the bolts from their rifles for his inaugural parade. Disabling the military like this just seems so wrong on so many levels.

http://www.examiner.com/article/disabled-marine-ri fles-at-inauguration-signal-shift-administration-p olicy
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 07:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.jerrypournelle.com/chaosmanor/?p=12092

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276139/Da vid-Petraeus-CIA-directors-bodyguards-exposed-affa ir-Paula-Broadwell-claims-Benghazi-The-Definitive- Report.html#axzz2KVQpNCmp

We will see over time if Bengazigate has factual basis or traction with the American "media". ( the traction part is independent of facts )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 10:19 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Unfortunately, I don't see where anything regarding Benghazi rises to an impeachable offense. Incompetence, sure. Completely ignoring your duties of office, sure. Is that impeachable though? I have serious doubts. If it's not impeachable, then all there is, is talk. Enough factual talk might get some low level people thrown to the wolves. Hillary is already gone. BO will never take responsibility for anything that he didn't do though, even if doing nothing is the offense. To make things worse, without the power of the media behind the talk, there is very little power. It is extremely unlikely that the major media outlets will give coverage to the failings of BO in Benghazi. Sadly, we have evidence that when the 3 AM phone call that Hillary once spoke of finally came, neither BO or Hillary bothered to answer. You can be sure that our enemies are paying attention to this.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 10:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think the greater issue at hand is Obamas use of War Powers without Congressional Approval.

Benghazi will be sprinkles on top.

Add to the list of offenses, the misuse of Executive Orders in violation of the Second Amendment, Dereliction of Duty as Chief Enforcement Officer with regard to enforcement of Immigration Laws and the Defense of Marriage Act, and Incorrect Utilization of Recess Appointments.

I believe there is plenty of impeachable offenses to be had.

I like what the house did with the "no pass, no pay". It was the first muscle the House has flexed, and I think the results were promising.

The sequestration should be allowed to happen. $1.2 trillion over 10 years is just a drop in the bucket. The House has the ability to defund much of the questionable policies, and I believe after NP, NP will take bolder action.

The debt ceiling issue will be coming up after the sequestration fight. I believe Obama has run out of manufactured pressure points to hammer Republicans against regarding the budget.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 10:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Americans must be made aware of the negligence of the POS occupying the White House. Lindsay Graham is doing a great service to America by keeping the Benghazi issue alive and demanding answers.

Mr. President, do something you are good at. Go play golf. Or continue to be Presidential like you were on September 11, 2012 and go back to sleep so you could not be held accountable for making a decision during the election cycle.

There are only three kinds of people who voted for Obama in 2012:

* Ignorant fools.
* Those on the take.
* Traitors intent on subverting the Constitution of the United States of America.

There are no exceptions. Only people in the first category are capable of waking up.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 10:40 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I believe there is plenty of impeachable offenses to be had.

I have to agree. Far more serious that the charges against Clinton too. You can see exactly how far that is going though.

Lindsay Graham is doing a great service to America by keeping the Benghazi issue alive and demanding answers.

He is. Most of the media will do their part to make sure that most of the population never knows the story. We do live in interesting times.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thumper1203
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 02:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There are only three kinds of people who voted for Obama in 2012:

* Ignorant fools.
* Those on the take.
* Traitors intent on subverting the Constitution of the United States of America.

There are no exceptions. Only people in the first category are capable of waking up.

You nailed it Reindog. There is hope, though.. people are waking up, I see it every day
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Macbuell
Posted on Monday, February 11, 2013 - 02:34 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"no pass, no pay"

No Pass, No pay is another parlor trick. Their pay will be held in escrow and they will be paid in full at a later date. It's not like they are going to be losing any money. More political theater from the jerks in DC.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2013 - 02:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340827/achi eve-ye-goal-mark-steyn

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340740/oper ation-hubris-jonah-goldberg

Comments on the SOTN speech.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340747/defe nse-obama-s-drone-war-charles-krauthammer

I don't often agree with Krauthammer, but I do, mostly, here.

Where we differ is the comparison to LBJ. his infamous comment, "Them boys over there can't bomb an outhouse without my permission" was the grand declaration of stupidity in civilian control of the military.

LBJ's war was one of insane Rules of engagement, body counts instead of goals, an accountants way of war, and most harmful, one where bombing was a means of sending a "message" that was always interpreted as weakness and foolishness by the enemy.

GW Bush's war on Afghanistan and Iraq were the exact opposite. Victory was achieved with precise goals, the enemy was destroyed and fled, and we were greeted as liberators and heroes.

Then the Occupation began, the Rules of Engagement became insane, and we deliberately tried to be "nice" and "politely" hope that a constant stream of jihadi and weapons sent from Syria & Iran would stop if we were culturally sensitive. We ( the State Dept Brahmins ) backed total thug losers into power. We won the wars with near miraculous precision and speed. We let the Lefty cretins at State etc. screw the peace up.

( I would have focused on stopping the supply of incoming weapons and jihadi, brutally, and backed up the locals against the attempts by Saddam's clan to retake power. There would never have been a second battle of Fallujah, since the first would have ended the threat, and his clan. Iran would have followed Iraq into freedom when we retaliated against the Imams and, oh, yeah, stolen their freaking oil. ) I tend to the Jacksonian in matters of war.


http://pjmedia.com/blog/huntsmans-disqualifying-di stortion-about-vietnam/

Obama's version of the "outhouse" comment is his bragging that HE and he alone picks and choses who dies. Obama, we are told, picks the high priority targets to be "sanctioned" or "eliminated". He apparently has nothing at all to do with picking which weddings and birthday parties the women and children are blown up and burned to death at. At least no mention is made at those times of the President's keen powers of decision.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340376/obam a-s-hypocritic-oath-victor-davis-hanson

The startling disconnect between the rhetoric and the reality
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2013 - 03:07 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/09/25/obama-d enounces-anti-islam-film-during-u-n-speech-an-insu lt-not-only-to-muslims-but-to-america-as-well/

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam but to be credible those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated or churches destroyed or the Holocaust that is denied,” Obama proclaimed.

I find myself in rare agreement with Obama. Unfortunately, I don't think HE believes what he said. ( after all, he had imprisoned the "film maker" to please the Jihadi. Fool. )

We should not slander the Prophet.
We should speak truth about him, and his followers.

I'm an American. ( birth certificate and all )
I will defend your right to worship as you please. ( except human sacrifice, or holy violent jihad )
I will defend your right to mock other religions.
I will defend your right to be offended. You have no right to not be offended.
I will defend another's right to mock your religion.

I will mock any religion I chose, too. Get over it. Let's face it, no matter if it's the Bar bet religion/money making scheme of Scientology, the intolerant, slaving, misogynist psychosis of Islamism, or the gold crusted child rapist protectors of the Mother Church, some religions DESERVE to be criticized.

But not slandered. that would be lying about it. That is wrong.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2013 - 09:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)



It's a brave 'new' world
http://tinyurl.com/cw67qmz

Those paying attention will notice that this show has been played before.
BOHICA
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenm123t
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2013 - 09:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Rein Thanks a Bunch I wanted to go fly today but I live in Dear leaders no fly zone. The clumsy idiot is wasting his time about 3/4 of a mile from my house The real reason he is here is to play golf with Tiger Woods who is starting the Honda Classic soon
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hootowl
Posted on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 - 08:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This is why the dems fight so hard against voter ID laws.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/ohio-po ll-worker-obama-supporter-investigated-for-potenti ally-voting-six-times/

The comical part is that they don't believe they've broken the law. The lie is strong in them.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thumper1203
Posted on Wednesday, February 20, 2013 - 08:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I thought this was worthy of posting.. this type of fraud utterly sickens me. By the way.. FOX news!, their mantra "the spin stops here".. they are on an all out campaign to expose things of this nature..



This is an incredible story that is the personification of a government that is out of control, with no intention of righting itself because giving this kind of “stuff “ in return for votes is now a part of its political culture.

I invite all of you to send this to your respective Representative and Senator.



WHILE PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA TAKES THE STAGE AT HIS 2ND INAUGURATION HE TALKS ABOUT OUR RESPONSI BILITY TO ENSURE EVERYONE GETS THEIR "FAIR SHARE" AND A "FAIR SHOT"....

IN GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED HOUSING EVERYWHERE ACROSS AMERICA, PEOPLE ARE SITTING IN THEIR LIVING ROOMS WATCHING THE INAUGURATION ON THEIR BIG SCREEN T.V.'S AND CHEERING HIM ON....

We felt like this was the perfect time to share this IMPORTANT story with you. Recently, our good friend Michael (a local realtor) shared his experience with Leisa and I about an "Obama supporter" he encountered while showing homes to a low income, working family in Pontiac, MI.. We asked him to please write it down so we could share it with you.
YOU SHOULD BE SITTING DOWN WHILE READING THIS:

As a Realtor for the past 28 years I thought I’d seen or heard it all… Until now.
I was showing homes in Pontiac, MI. one afternoon recently and showed up at a home at the 4:00 pm time my appointment was scheduled for. After I woke up the homeowner, she let us in and then proceeded to tell my buyers and I that she has already entered into a contract to sell the home on a short-sale. (A short-sale is a sale where the banks accept less money than is owed on the home). After some chit-chat, she proceeded to tell us that she and her sister (who also lived in the area) were buying each other’s homes via the short-sale process. I mentioned to her that I thought relatives could not be involved in those transactions. She smiled and said "We have two different last names so no one knows the difference".

She went on to tell us that each of them owed over 100K on their homes and were in the process of buying each other’s homes for about 10-15K cash. To top it off, they were each receiving $3,000.00 in government provided relocation assistance at the closing.

My buyers and I were amazed that she was outright admitting to fraud and yet, she continued. She began to tell us that the best part of her scheme was that because they currently were not working that they (both) are now receiving Section 8 Vouchers. I said I thought those were for renters and she said “That’s the best part; me and my sister are going to be renting each other’s homes so we don’t even have to move, and Obama is going to give us each $800.00 a month to pay the rent!” She then picked up a picture she had framed of Obama and did a little happy dance around her living room and while she kissed the picture she was singing "Thank you Obama.... thank you Obama."

So here is the bottom line… Both of these scammers got at least $80,000.00 in debt forgiven, $3,000.00 in cash for relocation (when in fact they did not relocate) and to boot, you and I will now be paying (through our taxes) $1,600.00 in rent for each them each and every month.... perhaps forever!

Is it any wonder why so many people have decided that all they have to do is VOTE for the Democrats and they will be taken care of for life at the expense of the taxpayers? I would not be at all surprised if they are receiving food stamps and whatever other programs are available for anyone who is willing to lie to get assistance.

These women went from working and paying about $900.00 each in mortgage payments to staying home and getting paid $800.00 each per month to live in the same home they had been living in and all they had to do was lie on a few papers. This craziness has to stop! I’m sure this kind of fraud is going on each and every day all across the country and no one wants to touch the subject of entitlements because they might OFFEND someone or lose a vote or two.

By the way... she had an almost new SUV in the driveway, three flat screen TV's and a very nice computer set up in her living room which was furnished entirely with nice leather furniture.

I'TS THE NEW 'AMERICAN WAY'.....
For all of the "do-gooder's" who voted for Obama to help the "less fortunate"....CHEERS.....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, February 21, 2013 - 03:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Source please?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thumper1203
Posted on Thursday, February 21, 2013 - 05:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

@ Blake, pm sent..
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Friday, February 22, 2013 - 08:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

While Obama has his little quirks, the next one up for his job might even be worse....

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/nyregion/top-aid e-to-cuomo-rebukes-state-worker-who-talked-to-the- press.html?_r=0

Just like Obama, if you disagree, you will be destroyed. Rights? Hah! sucker.

Oh yeah, Obama's quirks? How about lying collectivist tyrannical overlord?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bob-woodwar d-obamas-sequester-deal-changer/2013/02/22/c0b65b5 e-7ce1-11e2-9a75-dab0201670da_print.html
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration