G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archive through September 07, 2021 » Former President 0. » Archive through October 17, 2012 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 01:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

BTW
I got a nice letter from Richard Burrs' office about the "off shore" voting software provider.

The hill has prepared for this, pay close attention to the results as they come in.
I hope against all hope that R/R have a 30 pt landslide - and a clear electoral majority
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenm123t
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 05:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

WOLF why do I have to pick just one? When all three are correct answers!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mtnmason
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 05:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Sorry to butt-in, seeing as how I'm not a regular on this thread, but am I the only one who is absolutely certain that this election will be stolen by BHO if not won outright (which it won't be)? OUR votes are going to be tallied by a Spanish company with ties to George Soros and we have a media who will happily look the other way. A landslide might be hard to skew so thats all I can hang my hopes on.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pellis
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 06:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

OUR votes are going to be tallied by a Spanish company with ties to George Soros and we have a media who will happily look the other way.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fact-check-does-so ros-own-an-overseas-company-that-will-count-u-s-vo tes/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 06:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mtnmason
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 06:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

^ even so, is it not troubling regardless if Soros is involved or not? I just think there is a reason BO looked so nonchalant last debate. We'll see what transpires tonight.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mtnmason
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 06:54 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Moreover, consider his comment to Medvedev.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 07:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I've noticed that Chis Mathews hasn't asked about that....

I hate to tell Chris, but I don't think he's Obama's type.

For who IS Obama's type, I don't know. Guess I'll have to wait for the book. http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-obama-hid-gay-lif e-to-become-president/ Ok, maybe Mathews has a shot. http://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay

Ok. That Settles it! If the Globe says so, it must be false. Barry's not gay. ( If the Enquirer reports on politician's affairs, it tends to be true... the Globe? The Globe had Bush and Rice having an affair. She's way too smart for that. Also Clinton and Aliens... )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 07:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hoping no one remembers in a few hours that I've picked on our possibly first Gay President...

Obama's comment to Medvedev is really disturbing. Why has no one asked him about this? I bet anyone here a beer that the question doesn't get asked at the debate tonite.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jramsey
Posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - 09:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Got this email today from a friend,he's a pretty conservative person like myself, would like to figure out how to change it around.

It's good for a chuckle.


http://www.romneytaxplan.com/
Notice where it takes you if you click donate.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Roderick
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 01:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I became a US citizen a few months before I graduated from high school and enlisted in the USAF in 1983. Prior to that, I was busy learning on what is America and the Carter years served as my education about US presidential politics.

Throughout the Reagan, B41, Clinton, and B43 years, never mind the partisan political contests, which I believes to be a sign of a healthy democracy, I had faith in the American people precisely because of their willingness to examine a candidate through a political partisan prism, even if that examination sometimes tread into the distasteful.

In any corporation, the CEO can be hired from the outside, of which his accomplishments are wide open for scrutiny before he is interviewed for the job. He can also be promoted from within, of which his accomplishments are also wide open for scrutiny before he is interviewed for the job.

No options for the Presidency other than to promote from within.

So between McCain and Obama, how did the latter bypassed that moral burden of the American electorate in having a close scrutiny of a candidate's work record prior to promoting him? The 2008 election was my disappointment in the American electorate.

Now, after watching two debates between two candidates vying for the same position, I wonder if my fellow Americans remember their moral burden and if they do, I wonder if they realize the quandary they put themselves and their country into: They have a candidate with a work record of failures, deceit, and radicalism but through their emotional investments made them resistant to the more qualified candidate.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 02:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Let's just hire a beverage CEO to run a motorcycle company ?......
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alfau
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 03:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Can a beverage CEO make a Motorcycle that won't leave you feeling duped.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 05:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Now, after watching two debates between two candidates vying for the same position, I wonder if my fellow Americans remember their moral burden and if they do, I wonder if they realize the quandary they put themselves and their country into: They have a candidate with a work record of failures, deceit, and radicalism but through their emotional investments made them resistant to the more qualified candidate.

The polls suggest that Americans DO see what has happened and will correct our course on election day. One of the enemies we're presently fighting is a corrupt media - it makes it awful hard to see the truth when most of the people tasked with discovering the truth are sleeping with the enemy.

That said, look at the poll numbers. Specifically, look at the numbers and trends to date in TOTAL, and notice the direction and velocity of each party's candidate.

If we have a fair election and tally of votes it'll be R&R in a landslide, for all the obvious reasons, with patriotism being at the top of the list.

But IF they win it won't be the end of the war, of course, just a very important victory in the never-ending battle of eternal vigilance that is - and always will be - necessary to preserve and protect our great Republic against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.

Ferris
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 05:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

PS:

In any corporation, the CEO can be hired from the outside, of which his accomplishments are wide open for scrutiny before he is interviewed for the job.

Of the two men in the debate last night, the history of one of them is shrouded in mystery, much of it sealed off from public view, with many legitimate questions and concerns STILL being raised by scholars to this day as to who, and what, this man really is.

The history (and accomplishments) of the other man is an open book, easily researched and easily verifiable.

One of the men in the debate last night seems to have a lot to hide, and has done much to insure that his past remains a closely-guarded secret.

The other man has repeatedly stood tall, looked America right in the eye, and said, "This is who I am, this is where I'm from, this is what I've accomplished personally and professionally, here are my values and beliefs, and this is what I can - and will - do to as President help insure YOUR individual success and freedom."

Wide open for scrutiny.

Of the two candidates debating last night, which man succeeds in this regard?

Take care,
FB
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 06:07 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)


quote:

Obama On Debt In 2008




http://youtu.be/6fUmFBMVWNI





quote:

“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure,” he said. “It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. … Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."

-- Barack Obama, March 2006

Source: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/04/obama -2006-vs-obama-january-2011-vs-obama-april-2011-on -the-debt-ceiling/





quote:

National Debt has increased more under Obama than under Bush
Mark Knoller / CBS News/ March 19, 2012




(CBS News) The National Debt has now increased more during President Obama's three years and two months in office than it did during 8 years of the George W. Bush presidency.

...The latest posting from the Bureau of Public Debt at the Treasury Department shows the National Debt now stands at $15.566 trillion. It was $10.626 trillion on President Bush's last day in office, which coincided with President Obama's first day.

...Mr. Obama has been quick to blame his predecessor for the soaring Debt, saying Mr. Bush paid for two wars and a Medicare prescription drug program with borrowed funds.

The federal budget sent to Congress last month by Mr. Obama, projects the National Debt will continue to rise as far as the eye can see. The budget shows the Debt hitting $16.3 trillion in 2012, $17.5 trillion in 2013 and $25.9 trillion in 2022.

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57400369-50 3544/national-debt-has-increased-more-under-obama- than-under-bush/





quote:



Source: http://www.therightscoop.com/the-numbers-that-show -obamas-economy-isnt-working-literally/





quote:

"Americans deserve better."



Indeed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 11:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

In all fairness, the rising slope of debt isn't all the picture - it should be indexed against the real value of currency based against the market ratio of gold....
So not only are you SPENDING MORE in pure numerical stacks of bills - but EACH is WORTH significantly LESS.

Remember the stories of that candy bar for a nickel that was told from the WWII generation ?.... Last check it hovered around over a buck at Wally world unless you had a coupon....

They are on the march to defund that currency- whether it makes any difference on who is in the office when it happens; remains to be seen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 11:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

In all fairness, the rising slope of debt isn't all the picture...

Concur, for the reasons you stated, and many more. However, the visual representation above of our staggering national debt, which has increased by over 60% on 0bama's watch, contrasted with the equally grim numbers presented in the "0bama Economy Isn't Working" graphic above, tell the tale of his failed presidency far better than you or I could ever hope to do with words alone.


They are on the march to defund that currency- whether it makes any difference on who is in the office when it happens; remains to be seen.

I worry about this, regardless of who is elected.

But, we KNOW what we're gonna get with four (or more?) years of 0bama.

Romney? He says he's the real deal, and I think he's telling the truth.

If he's not? Well, can he be WORSE than 0bama?


Speaking of, I'd like to present the two graphics above personally to 0bama and ask him if he truly thinks he's earned another term. By his own admission, he has NOT:


quote:

FLASHBACK: Obama: My Presidency Will Be 'A One-Term Proposition' If Economy Doesn't Turn In 3 Years

Uploaded by CNSNews on Aug 5, 2011

President Barack Obama said in February 2009 that his presidency would be "one-term proposition" if the economy did not recover in three years, giving him less than six months from today.




http://youtu.be/CCN5-ovvFL0


What say you, Mr. 0bama? 0ne and done??
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 12:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This is too easy:


quote:

Obama will cut deficit in half FEB 2009
Uploaded by johnjms2 on Feb 15, 2011


Obama talks about how he will cut the deficit in half during his first term - and why it's so important. Really? The 2008 budget deficit was 458 billion. Obama's proposed new budget for this year has a deficit of 1.1 TRILLION. For God's sake - WTF???




http://youtu.be/SaQUU2ZL6D8
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Wolfridgerider
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 01:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

No one that voted for McCain in 2008 will/would vote for Obama in 2012. Not a chance!

O won Ohio by only 262,224 votes. I think turn out is going to be key.



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 01:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think you are right, and that Ohio will have a big conservative turn out this year. There were a lot of conservatives just tired and who weren't thrilled about McCain.

I casually knew a number of people around me (Warren and Butler county) that voted for Obama who I thought "what are you *thinking*?" when I heard it. Now many of them seem to be saying "what was I thinking?".

No idea if it will be enough to overturn the urban areas though...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 04:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yeah, it's Breitbart again. They're prolly making all this stuff up, dirty right-wing bastards that they are, but just in case there's a grain of truth somewhere in all of this:


Romney's Secret Blowout
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /Romney-big-winner

'Independent' Audience Asks Twice As Many Anti-Romney Questions
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /audience-questions-2-to-1-anti-Romney

CNN Poll: Romney Buries Obama On Economy
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /CNN-Poll-Romney-Wallops-Obama-on-Economy

CBS Poll: Romney Wallops Obama On Economy 65-34%
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /CBS-Debate-Poll-Romney-Wins-on-Economy

Romney Surges in New Hampshire, Now Tied
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /Romney-Huge-surge-New-Hampshire-Now-Tied

Crowley Saves Obama with False Fact-Check
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/16 /Crowley-Saves-Obama-with-false-fact-check

Crowley Interrupts Romney 28 Times, Obama Just 9
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/17 /Crowley-interrupts-28-times-Romney

Fact Check: Romney Beats Both Opponents, Narrowly
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /Live-Debate-Fact-Check-and-Analysis

Obama's Brutal Gaffe: Low Gas Prices Cratered Our Economy
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /Obama-worst-gaffe-gas-prices

Romney Surges in Wisconsin, Tied with Obama
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /WI-Romney-surges-10-points-tied-with-obama

Gallup: Romney Up 51-45%, Proving Biden Lost Debate
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /Gallu-Romney-up-6-biden-lost-debate

Romney Destroys Obama's Auto Bailout Argument: 'You Actually Took GM, Chrysler Bankrupt'
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /Romney-Destroys-Obama-Argument-on-Auto-Bailout-Yo u-Actually-Took-GM-Chrysler-Bankrupt

Pres. Debate: What about Fast and Furious?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /What-About-Fast-and-Furious

Fact Check: Top Ten Worst Lies of the Second Presidential Debate
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17 /Top-Ten-Lies-of-the-Second-Presidential-Debate

Obama Misleadingly Claims Gov't Got Back 'Every Dime' of Bailouts
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /Obama-Misleadingly-Claims-Gov-t-Got-Back-Every-Di me-of-Bailouts

Romney Presses Obama on Fast and Furious in Town Hall Debate
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/16 /Gov-Romney-to-Obama-When-Are-We-Going-to-Get-Answ ers-On-Fast-And-Furious

'WaPo' Smacks Obama For Not Answering Libya Question
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/17 /Wapo-Smacks-Obama-for-libya-question

Report: Rule Change Allows Candy Crowley To Steal Debate Spotlight
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/16 /Last-minute-rule-change-gives-crowley-debate-spot light

Crowley's False Fact Check Saves President, Derails Debate - UPDATE: Crowley Backtracks
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/16 /Crowley-Saves-Obama-with-false-fact-check



There's more, LOTS more, at Breitbart, but really, how much more of this obviously patriotic propaganda crap can you really stand??

#WAR
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Moxnix
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 04:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Haven't reached my limit, keep it flowing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sifo
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 07:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I think we may have just had our engineered October surprise...

Would-Be Terrorist Tried to Bomb New York Federal Reserve Bank: Feds

Would be terrorist, but was "never a threat to the public". This scenario has played out way too many times in the past few years. Dupe some fool into thinking that you are going to help him blow so shit up and give him a phony bomb. Then you can arrest him and pat yourself on the back for keeping the public safe. The timing on this one is perfect too, just before BO's must win debate on foreign policy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 07:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Wow, that's an incredibly detailed news report for something that just happened earlier today...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 07:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just watched the video report in the link. Same observation: That's a LOT of detail for an incident so fresh...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 08:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Haven't reached my limit, keep it flowing.

Glutton.


Candy Crowley Plays Biggest Loser with Obama
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/candy_crowl ey_plays_biggest_loser_with_obama.html

Once Biden, Twice Barack
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/once_biden_ twice_barack.html

Romney Wins the Three-Way Debate at Hofstra
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/romney_wins _the_three-way_debate_at_hofstra.html

Leaks, Lies, and Libya: How Not to Inform a Nation
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/leaks_lies_ and_libya_how_not_to_inform_a_nation.html

Benghazi Consulate's 3 AM Phone Call
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/benghazi_co nsulates_3_am_phone_call.html

Obama's Campaign Bus Parks on Top of Hillary
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/obamas_camp aign_bus_parks_on_top_of_hillary.html

'We Must Unite'
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/we_must_uni te.html

Not All Jobs Are Created Equal
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/not_all_job s_are_created_equal.html

ACA: The More You Know, the More You Hate
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/aca_more_yo u_know_more_you_hate.html



Uncle? : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fb1
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 08:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

This one deserves a proper introduction:

quote:

Candy Crowley Plays Biggest Loser with Obama
Selwyn Duke, Oct 17, 2012

You might think that with all the recent focus on media bias in debate moderation, Candy Crowley would have minded her p's and q's in last night's presidential debate. But clearly, she doesn't even know the ABC's of her job.

Her most obvious transgression was chiming in and contradicting Mitt Romney's assertion that Barack Obama did not label the Benghazi attack an act of terror when he spoke in the Rose Garden on Sept. 12. Crowley's unwarranted meddling was significant. The apparent lies surrounding the Libya tragedy are a huge scandal for Obama, and, with the mainstream media's failure to aggressively cover the story, the debate was a golden opportunity to get the truth out.

Enter Crowley's Passion. She snuck into the ring, without Obama even tagging her, and hit Romney from behind with a chair while the ref, Crowley's Brain, was looking the other way. And, as was established later, she was wrong. It was, as Thomas Sowell wrote recently, a display of what Obama himself is guilty of: confident ignorance.



Source, and read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/candy_crowl ey_plays_biggest_loser_with_obama.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Moxnix
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 10:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Burp. Thanks. I've room in my hollow leg for a side salad of acrimony and liter of your favorite dry red criticism.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 10:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Time to put the corrupt leftist machine on notice. No more.
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration