| Author | Message | ||
     Mnrider |
It was just on MSN they had record sales today. I don't care what people do behind closed doors but mother nature never intended for people or anything of the same sex to have"sex" or whatever they do. | ||
| 86129squids |
My best buddy growing up had a female chihuahua that would dry-hump anything. Mn- why not "father" nature? Why do refer to our favorite vehicles in the feminine? Any given person you see out in public today probably has some kind of sex life, most probably exercised in private- WHO they are otherwise is all I'm concerned with. I will say that as far as the "family unit" goes, homosexual people who want to do the right thing raising kids or looking after the health and welfare of each other and their families generally cannot legally do so, due to discriminatory social and government policies. I don't think this is right at all. I also don't believe in "advertising" one's sexual proclivities, just as excessive "PDA's" aren't needed. FWIW, our idiotic state legislators here in TN have been busy spending our tax $$$ legislating against "gateway" sexual activities by minors, with teachers liable to be penalized WITH A FINE when kids do much more than hold hands. Fqqtards, I say. | ||
| Sifo |
So on the issue of the "kiss-in" that they have planned for Friday... does anyone think that this is a tactic that helps their cause in any way? I'm just not at all convinced that this will help them be more accepted by the mainstream public. Knowing what goes on during the gay pride event in Chicago, I don't see where putting it your face helps. Under normal circumstances these displays would get you arrested. Chicago's mayor seems to feel it's right to treat a certain group differently than the rest of the population. I really couldn't care what they do in their own domicile. It really turns me against them when they try to stick it in my face. I would be equally offended if heterosexuals tried to do the same things in public BTW. | ||
| Xl1200r |
Under normal circumstances these displays would get you arrested. Huh? Really? I would be equally offended if heterosexuals tried to do the same things in public BTW. So if a married couple kissed/held hands/gazed into each others eyes in public, you'd be offended? Maybe I'm misjudging how "intense" a kiss-in is - I've never heard of one let alone witnessed one. I do think the tactic is a bit childish, but I also think the mass chicken eating is equally immature. I'll gracefully bow out at this point - I've been able to stay out of socio-political threads for a long time now and I've found that when the "homosexual issue" arises, BadWeB, aside from a sometimes vocal minority, turns into quite an intolerant social network. It's not like they're telling you your idea of a couple or a family is wrong... People scare me. | ||
| Sifo |
So if a married couple kissed/held hands/gazed into each others eyes in public, you'd be offended? I'm referring to what goes on during the gay pride event. I can't judge the "kiss-in" simply because it hasn't happened yet. I'm talking about stripping naked, hopping on stage with the band and performing live sex acts. This was done right in front of the police who wouldn't even remove them from the stage. Try that at ANY other public outdoor event where they have a band and see how long until the cuffs are on you. | ||
| Xl1200r |
Sifo - thanks for the clarification - I wasn't aware that's what went on. I agree, that would be arrest-worthy actions. | ||
| Sifo |
I wouldn't have known either, except the band that was playing were all friends of mine. I've heard the account of that situation from five different viewpoints many times. | ||
| Notpurples2 |
Sifo, Seriously? You are actually saying that during a gay pride parade you witnessed a gay person(s) get naked, fully exposing their genitals (and/or breasts in the case of a woman) and perform sex acts such as oral, anal, or mastabatory acts? And they did this in full view of a crowd of people AND law enforcement and were not arrested? Or were they just dressed in skimpy clothes and dancing in a sexually suggestive way (for example "grinding") Both those acts may be offensive to you but they are vastly different and one is criminal while the other is just offensive. I've been to gay bars with gay friends and never seen gay people having sex in public, just the typical PDA's I've seen at regular clubs... technically less because I did once see a hetero couple having sex against a bar in club in Cancun. They were fully clothed but it was obvious what they were doing. I was actually a little nervous going into the bathroom at the gay bar, but alas there wasn't any hanky-panky going on in there either.... I have seen more than one pair of feet in bathroom stalls before in straight clubs. | ||
| Sifo |
Sifo, Seriously? You are actually saying that during a gay pride parade you witnessed a gay person(s) get naked, fully exposing their genitals (and/or breasts in the case of a woman) and perform sex acts such as oral, anal, or mastabatory acts? And they did this in full view of a crowd of people AND law enforcement and were not arrested? I would only change three facts in what you wrote. 1) No, I didn't personally witness it. I know the five people who were playing in the band who did get a very close view of what was going on, and I hear about it regularly from each of them at various times. 2) This wasn't just going on in public, they hopped up on stage with the band do do this. 3) no female breasts were involved. | ||
| Sifo |
BTW, if you aren't familiar with the Chicago gay pride parade, the stage I'm talking about isn't set up in a bar somewhere. It's out on public streets in the Wrigleyville area. There are people (including children) who need to walk through those streets to get around their neighborhood. There are no warning signs posted stating that you are entering an area that may have lude behavior going on to help the uninitiated avoid being exposed (or exposing their children) to this sort of thing. | ||
| Mnrider |
@ squids A dog is an inbread confined animal far removed from nature. If you put sheep in a pen with each other without access to the way mother or father nature intended that animal to live it starts doing unnatural things,just like homosexuality grows out of. To me all openly gay people are like Sandusky with all the weirdness. | ||
| Notpurples2 |
Sifo, I was thinking this was happening on parade float for some reason. I correctly got the impression they would have been in full view of the public. Yes, if they were actually having sex then they should have been arrested, doesn't matter if they were gay or straight. Even if they were just mimicking sex acts while children were present then they really should have been asked to stop and leave the stage/area. I don't think the rest of the gay community should be judge on the actions of those particular people. | ||
| Buellinmke |
 | ||
| Sifo |
The police not only didn't arrest them, they didn't even get them off the stage as per the band's request over the PA system. As for the rest of the gay community, I understand that they were quite in favor of what was going on at the moment. I also worked with a gay guy for 5 years. We became pretty good friends. He openly discussed many things that I really didn't need to know about. While he was in a "committed relationship" for over 15 years, if I had straight friends telling me similar stories, I would fully expect their relationship to end in a grand finale of fireworks. Let's just say that IMO, males do better in a relationship that is tempered with the feared wrath of a female partner. After this guy's "partner" died of AIDS, he hooked up with two other gays and moved down to Key West to run a gay bar. Last I heard one of the partners embezzled all he could and fled the country. | ||
| Froggy |
I love all these sex and weirdos in public stories, it is like they only happen with homosexuals. Having sex in public is illegal in most areas, if they were caught in NYC doing that they would be arrested. Also a FYI, exposing breasts is not illegal here in NYC, on some rare occasions you can catch some women topless sunbathing in Central Park. | ||
| Kenm123t |
now we understand your pony suits Froggy lol | ||
| Sifo |
Froggy, I have no doubt that heterosexuals have been known to do pretty sexually explicit things in public too. There's one huge difference though. With the heterosexuals NOBODY is accepting if it. With the homosexuals we are told not to be homophobic. We are told we need to be more "tolerant". Sorry, but I'm not tolerant of that sort of behavior from anyone. Our government OTOH apparently is. | ||
| Froggy |
There is no difference, sex in public is not tolerated by our government, be it homo or hereto. As for why those guys in the parade weren't arrested, I haven't a clue. Maybe they were playing the "it's art" card or something. A quick glance at this site shows that sex in public is technically ok if you have a reasonable expectation of privacy like in the middle of nowhere. It goes on to mention that "Police will usually only act on a complaint from a third-party or witness", so I assume that might of been a factor with the parade. http://www.thesite.org/homelawandmoney/law/yourrig hts/sexinpublic | ||
| Sifo |
First, this wasn't a parade, it's a multi-day event. Second, the reason that police usually only act on a complaint from a third party is because usually they are nowhere to be found when the infraction happens. In the situation I'm talking about they not only didn't enforce public decency laws, they also failed to act to simply remove them from the stage when the request was made of them over the PA system. I would guess that they simply bent to the pressure of the many gays in attendance who were cheering the guys on rather than enforce the law. | ||
| Xdigitalx |
| ||
| Racerx |
 | ||
| Boltrider |
Imagine the liberal rancor if a business owner was denied a development permit due to that owner's pro-choice stance. | ||
| Xdigitalx |
These here people in that jpg are probably in church, and/or organizing another food bank for the needy or whatnot...What do YOU do on sunday's? | ||
| Johnnymceldoo |
Its funny that the white upper class progressive pencil necks lumps everyone who disapproves of gay marriage as stupid racist white evangelicals when their important base of blacks largely don't agree with their hip white devil philosophy. They try to equate gay rights to black civil rights or gay is just like black. | ||
| Sifo |
Wow! More Christian bashing. Never could have seen that coming. The party of "tolerance" has spoken. | ||
| Froggy |
Ok, so it was a different type of event. Was this a public venue?
Yea, or maybe they just didn't have the power to remove them from the stage. Mob mentalities and all that. Still sounds like it was poor form on both the gays and the police.
It wouldn't be any different, but they probably wouldn't be able to hide behind the bible and claim religion.
Yea while it is true you can't prove anything about anyone in those photos, you can bet the vast majority are just hopping on the bandwagon.
Sleep.
Right. | ||
| Racerx |
What do I do on Sunday? Well I don't sit on my ass and throw money at some guy who calls himself a man of god, drives a nice car and has a huge church. Think that I a buying my way into heaven with a feelin sorry for myself attitude, while said man of god preach fire and brimstone... | ||
| Kenm123t |
Racer your hate is Showing ! We dont hate or fear you or your agenda. You just do not matter | ||
| Racerx |
you guys know hate all too well don't you? Blacks, women, Jews, Japanese, Chinese, Mexicans, Native Americans, we'll just add gays to the looooong list of those that will have to overcome your hate and bigotry. I hope all your children come out of the closet and you have that hard choice of what to do. All the hypocrisy and irony of the true 'christian' always remind me of this...  | ||
| Boltrider |
In your mind, yes, and in mine also. My point was that the mayors of Chicago, San Fran, and Boston would be screaming to high heaven if some democrat were denied a business permit because they were pro-choice. And rightly so, as such a denial would be just as illegal as the one mentioned in Chicago in FB1's link on the previous page. |
