G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through February 16, 2012 » Will Catholics support the new rule on churches and contraception? « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through February 12, 2012Johnnymceldoo30 02-12-12  11:55 pm
Archive through February 10, 2012Sifo30 02-10-12  10:38 am
         

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Monday, February 13, 2012 - 12:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

nope,
all they need to do is off shore their plan to incorporate in 'Rome' then set up the plan as an associate benefit allocation - with an HSP, a Flex account, and a life policy - Fly with NO HEALTH plan at all.
go to a simply pay on employees, adjust their salary as such - and if they want it - they can go pay for it.
(it is cheaper and more cost effective to pay for services as you need them, when you need them, and bank, invest, the money you would have spent on premium)

Its a capitalist society - the capitalists will find a way out of it - let the liberal socialists wallow in their own
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Aesquire
Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 08:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

http://www.nationalreview.com/author/56454/latest

....Well, here’s something to ponder: If Rick Santorum’s warning doesn’t scare you, maybe Rick Santorum should. Personally, I think his detractors are determined to turn him into a right-wing caricature (a cause he has aided more than once). He’s been prodded about gay marriage, contraception, radical feminists, and his religious faith in the hopes that he will say something embarrassingly juicy for the MSNBC crowd.


But let’s imagine the caricature is fair and he really is the boogeyman Rachel Maddow and Co. say he is. Worse, all his talk about “freedom” is just code for the right-wing version of progressive social engineering, i.e., he wants to turn women into breeders á la The Handmaid’s Tale.

Is that who you want in charge of your health care? If not him, what about some other conservative president down the road?

It’s really this simple: A government empowered to steamroll the people with the rosaries has the same power to trample the citizens with the ovaries. If you’re afraid of Rick Santorum, you should be afraid of Obamacare.


http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/291008/hhs- mandate-one-battle-two-front-war-carl-anderson

... As Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston put it: “Jesus himself, or the Good Samaritan of his famous parable, would not qualify as ‘religious enough’ for the exemption, since they insisted on helping people who did not share their view of God.” ...

Of course I could just be paranoid about creeping fascism, and dictatorship, it's not like they are going to ban bag lunches at school in the First Ladies quest for absolute control over every single aspect of your life, are they?

http://www.nationalreview.com/home-front
Julie Gunlock's article on home packed meals. Feb 15 ( Badweb objected to the full link )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reindog
Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 08:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It is already here.

My wife, Laurie, teaches fourth grade in Oceanside, CA. She just got reprimanded by her principle because she rewarded her student's achievements with a pepperoni pizza party and pizza is "bad" for you. Laurie paid for the pizza with her own money and had been doing this for years. The Nitwits are controlling our lives, one silly thing at a time. Wow, thanks Michelle O and the Liberal idiots in Sacramento for making life a little less joyous.

Maybe pizza is "not good" for you but the absence of pizza is "bad" for the soul.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Moxnix
Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 09:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Please, sir, more gruel?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 11:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It is happening now folks. Just almost three decades late is all.

http://www.nccivitas.org/2012/state-inspectors-sea rching-childrens-lunch-boxes-this-isnt-china-is-it /

A mother in Hoke County complains her daughter was forced to eat a school lunch because a government inspector determined her home-made lunch did not meet nutrition requirements. In fact, all of the students in the NC Pre-K program classroom at West Hoke Elementary School in Raeford had to accept a school lunch in addition to their lunches brought from home.

NC Pre-K (before this year known as More at Four) is a state-funded education program designed to “enhance school readiness” for four year-olds.

The mother, who doesn’t wish to be identified at this time, says she made her daughter a lunch that contained a turkey and cheese sandwich, a banana, apple juice and potato chips. A state inspector assessing the pre-K program at the school said the girl also needed a vegetable, so the inspector ordered a full school lunch tray for her. While the four-year-old was still allowed to eat her home lunch, the girl was forced to take a helping of chicken nuggets, milk, a fruit and a vegetable to supplement her sack lunch.

The mother says the girl was so intimidated by the inspection process that she was too scared to eat all of her homemade lunch. The girl ate only the chicken nuggets provided to her by the school, so she still didn’t eat a vegetable.

The mother says her daughter doesn’t like vegetables and – like most four year olds – will only eat them at home under close supervision.


Who ever had veggies other than carrots or pickles in their sack lunch???

We are paying for people to inspect childrens' sack lunches????!!!!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Thumper74
Posted on Thursday, February 16, 2012 - 12:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I have an eight year old and the teacher has not allowed him to eat he unhealthy part of his lunch before... We talked about it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, February 16, 2012 - 12:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

My girl, Ann Coulter, on vibrating butt-plugs.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration