G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through December 26, 2009 » New 2 stroke? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ulynut
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 10:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

From Kneeslider magazine...





Two stroke engines are favorites of everyone who wants a really compact engine with lots of power, there are fewer parts and power delivery on every stroke. Of course, the blue haze from the exhaust didn't sit well with the enviro-police so they've pretty much disappeared from use in transportation, but, they are slipping back with new technology applied to the new designs.

EcoMotors has a design called OPOC, Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder. The design is just what it says, as you can see above, with 2 cylinders and 4 pistons. Peter Hofbauer came up with the idea when he was at Volkswagen, the outboard pistons take the place of the cylinder head and each piston only travels half the distance necessary for the full stroke, allowing higher engine speeds. An electrically controlled turbocharger can be used when necessary with adjustable boost, it can even spin up before the engine starts to give instant boost.

The engine can be built in a modular fashion, allowing more cylinders to be added in pairs with a clutch between the modules so one pair can be used at start or light load with the clutch adding more cylinders when required.

Emissions are said to be very low, meeting EPA standards for both gasoline and diesel configurations.

They're looking for 100 mpg in an automotive application, so just think what you could do with something like this in a motorcycle. Very cool!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xl1200r
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 10:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Not an entirely new concept, but a welcome addition me thinks:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Deltic
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Just_ziptab
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 10:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Needs to be built in a "V" configuration. Interesting..wonder how the short rods get along with the double long rods at high rpm?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Slaughter
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 10:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Junkers had similar concepts in the Jumo - opposed pistons, crankshafts on the "top end" of the engine - combustion chamber between 2 pistons.

Cool idea. More moving parts but more tolerable piston speeds

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Jumo_204
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 11:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Baere had done something similar with a "six stroke" air-cooled Ducati v-2 engine years ago. It was essentially a 4 stroke Ducati bottom end with an opposed cylinder 2 stroke top end working as the valve train at half-speed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hughlysses
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 11:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Very interesting. I'll bet a two-cylinder set has perfect balance because of the way the pistons are arranged.

Fairbanks-Morse also built similar diesels to the Jumo mentioned above with twin cranks and twin opposed pistons per cylinder. They were used in stationary applications, submarines (even nucs), and F-M made their own locomotives using these engines for a while in the 50's.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ferris_von_bueller
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 11:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

"There is nothing new under the sun"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 12:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Very clever, the valve is the piston, like a two stroke, but having two of them lets you get more control over port timing. Neat!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Natexlh1000
Posted on Monday, December 21, 2009 - 01:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Remember that piaggio two stroke that had two pistons opposed like that?
The carb had two throats, one larger than the other which only passed fresh air to the crank case. The other throat was smaller and sent a very rich mixture of fuel to the top end where a tiny piston would force it through a poppet valve into the combustion chamber.

The article I read said that it didn't smoke like a normal 50cc.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mr_grumpy
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 06:15 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I've actually driven a vehicle with a 2 stroke opposed piston engine.

Commer, part of the Rootes group who were eventually taken over by Chrysler, used to produce trucks powered by the TS3 engine.

3 cylinders 6 pistons one crankshaft & 6 rocker arms, oh & one big supercharger.

They were a beast to drive & extremely noisy, went well though.

This one is down in DD's part of the world.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mndwgz
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 07:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Rotax two strokes with the rotary valve are fairly efficient. Two plug heads are mandated on the aircraft models which probably also helps clean up emmisions, but they still needed oil in the mix. They can be tuned for max. RPM, torque and H.P. with pipe design and port timing with a little grinding on the rotary valve, run gas, alcohol, or even a mix of alcohol/nitro like this one did.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hughlysses
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 07:46 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Chrysler seriously researched two-strokes for auto power back in the 90's; this engine was originally going to power the Neon. It's not hard to build a two-stroke that doesn't require oil in the intake mixture, you just can't do it with crankcase scavenging like most small two-strokes have.

With conventional two-strokes, the "back" side of the piston pressurizes the crankcase which forces fuel/air/oil through a transfer port into the cylinder where it's burned. This design necessitates mixing (or injecting) oil with the fuel so that the mixture swirling around in the crankcase can lubricate the bearings and cylinder.

The Chrysler designs used an external Roots type supercharger instead of crankcase scavenging. This let them use a conventional oil sump and pressure lubrication system for their design just like 4-stroke auto engines. These engines used direct fuel injection (VERY new at the time) and two spark plugs per cylinder.

Evidently the engine worked well but had high NO2 emissions. Chrysler got into squabbles with the EPA and the whole program was dropped. More info here:

http://www.allpar.com/neon/stroke.html

(Message edited by Hughlysses on December 22, 2009)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Prowler
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 08:16 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I still don't understand why nobody seems to be looking into the latest design DI 2-strokes (like a new Evinrude Outboard has). The performance/weight/simplicity advantages are huge, and it should have no huge issues meeting exhaust regulations.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crackhead
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 09:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

That wold be bad in a SM. with the motor tucked up high at knee level oriented front to back, the motor would be the frame and the fuel would be under the seat.
The turbo and muffler under the motor. The trans output could be right at the pivot point for the swingarm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 08:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Cool Deltic video:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ft_bstrd
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 08:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Holy crap, this is a scary mofo:

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Klcm54a
Posted on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 - 08:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

The Germans made the first motorcycle. Then, they moved on to tanks for a few years.
Looks like one cylinder to me. I'll bet it is still more dependable and leaks less than a fatboy.

« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration