G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Archive through December 19, 2009 » 100,000hp crank « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Froggy
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 04:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)






I wonder if they would make a single to throw in the Blast?
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kustomklassix
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 04:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

A 7850 HP Blast...SIGN ME UP!!!!

Link to the ship for this big-azz engine -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_M%C3%A6rsk

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dalton_gang
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Wow! That kinda doesn't look real.

I wonder how much horse power it takes to crank it over?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kustomklassix
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

They get half the crew to jump on a platform attatched to the flywheel to get it slowly spinning to the point where the 1100hp starter motor can kick in
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Captcaz
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I'm almost jealous ... my last ship was a petite 750 feet long and weighed in at just under 50,000 tons ... 105,000 HP thru 4 gas turbines ... respectable.

http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/ships.asp?ship=7

On a smaller one now ... bringing up the rear with only 4,200HP.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dentguy
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 05:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

It's not that big. Those people are really small.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 06:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

the oompa loompas are working on the head rebuild for your old audi in line
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jramsey
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 06:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

60 HP electric motor with gear reduction in the lower left is used to bump the crank over during assy.

Anybody notice the steps/rungs in the crankcase throws,IIRC it was said the rod and main bearing inserts weigh over 80 lbs. apiece.

Somewhere on the net there is a picture of the planner/shaper and horizontal/ vertical boring mill that was used to align bore and machine the the lower crankcase half.


Oh, and someone needs to find a pic of the lathe that was used to turn the crank its quite a piece of machinery itself.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Cornering is going to be a problem. That is VERY cool.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Eboos
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

It needs some lightening to help it spin up faster.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Speedfreaks101
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 07:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Just imagine what would happen if you hit it with too much nitrous and it kicked out a rod!?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

J2blue
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 09:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

God I love these images. You know, I tried to make the point to the DMG/Buell naysayers who were so obsessed with displacement. Given a similar two mile course I think it would be fair to have one of these huge displacement ships racing against a 600cc rice burner. AND, there is a clear horsepower advantage to these giants. But...

Yep, Court, cornering and braking are the weak point.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Oldog
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 10:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

The guy in the green shirt see him?

the caption is "Oh $hit! I dropped my pen"

"I wonder if any one will notice if I just leave it"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Danger_dave
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 11:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I stowed away om a Freighter a few times. Me, her and an XS1100.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Danger_dave
Posted on Tuesday, December 08, 2009 - 11:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Ohmmmmm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Boltrider
Posted on Wednesday, December 09, 2009 - 12:46 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

5.6 million ft/lbs of torque should be enough.

Imagine how loud that sucker could be during testing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Big_b
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 11:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Here are some more pics. I work on a smaller version of this engine in the natural gas industry.

http://www.handpickedtrucks.com/wartsilla-ship-eng ine.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ferris_von_bueller
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 12:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

100rpm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Big_b
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 01:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

That's fast when you imagine all of that weight turning 360º in under a second. My Wartsila turns 800rpm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chadhargis
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 01:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

And someone, somewhere, is worried about whether they should use synthetic or dino oil and how they can save $3 on an oil filter.

LOL! : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Big_b
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 04:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

And buckets of loctite
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Edgydrifter
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 06:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

So, it uses manhole covers for valve shims?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Froggy
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 06:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I don't see any valves, looks like a 2 smoke.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gearhead571
Posted on Monday, December 14, 2009 - 08:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Two stroke diesels generally have poppet valves in the head. Usually four of them. They use a blower to provide air for scavenging and combustion. Your weed wacker uses the pressure created from the down stroke of the piston to force the intake air and fuel mix into the cylinder for combustion. Yes it is a two stroke.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Firebolt020283
Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 - 08:39 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

When I was stationed in south Korea I got to go on a tour of the hyundai factories, well i learned they do not just build cars they also build ships and they had engines that big and it was really neat to see engine blocks so big that you could get into one of the cylinders and probably walk around on top of a piston(they did not let us do this of course)
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration