G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » Quick Board » Archives » Double Nickel plus a 100 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Biker_bob
Posted on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 08:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

This will be a most interesting fine.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/R/REALLY_SPEEDING?SITE=FLDAY&SECTION=HOME&T EMPLATE=DEFAULT

Or how I spent my bike week in jail.

(Message edited by biker_bob on March 13, 2006)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Buellin_ri
Posted on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 09:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I'm sure there are a few people who have done better than 155mph. They just didn't get caught.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Midnightrider
Posted on Monday, March 13, 2006 - 09:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

i'm no legal eagle but seems he's got a big-time case against the authorities. isn't that violation of due process or something?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jackbequick
Posted on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 - 08:46 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

"..isn't that violation of due process or something?"

Sounds to me like he could use the time to think it over. He threatens others with his conduct, I'm not too worried about his tranquility and inner harmony being abraded a little.

If you ever get pulled over on the low number Interstates in LA or GA you could have an encounter with one of the most dishonest and morally corrupt law enforcement agencies in the entire U.S. You'll find that they are not too impressed with your knowledge of the law or what is right.

Jack
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Midnightrider
Posted on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 - 10:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I agree that it's not smart to challenge an allegedly corrupt officer of the law about your constitutional rights while you're sitting in his jail. That's a good way to wake up dead. And I don't know that his rights were violated - that was my point and that's what I was asking. But now that he is out (I hope) it IS the right time. I don't really care about his tranquility or inner harmony either (by the way where the heck did that come from?). Everybody breaks the rules sometime and when they do they need to suck it up and pay the price.
What I do care about is when folks in the legal system break the rules or start making their own. Look what just happened in the Mousouwa (I'm sure the spelling is not even close )case - the prosecution just lost half their case when the witnesses were illegally contacted and coached by another Federal lawyer.
Whether you are a big time Federal lawyer or a small town local Judge you don't get to wing it. I think when they accept the position and the responsibility they have to accept that they are expected to adhere to a higher standard. Nothing I hate more than a bully and thats all they are - love to know how it works out in this case.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cochise
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 12:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I'm sorry, but that, my friends, is Profiling. They weren't pulling over cars that were doing 155, just motorcycles. That's the problem with "The Man", trying to bring the bike man down.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Diablobrian
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 11:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that:

They can legally hold him until the next time court is in session as long as he is
charged with a crime. without a charge being filed they are limited to 24 hours.

They can also legally refuse to set bond on someone they think is a flight risk. I
bet they wouldn't have any problem justifying this one to a court of appeals.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cowboy
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 01:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Hey this is Louisiana they can do what ever they want. there is a 100 ways to hold you for ever.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration