G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Knowledge Vault (tech, parts, apparel, & accessories topics) » Chassis » Suspension - Forks, Isolators, Shocks, and Swingarm » Archive through March 11, 2008 » Cyclone low front shock mount part number « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gbgbuell
Posted on Wednesday, August 08, 2007 - 09:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hi, anybody know the part number for a 2001 Cyclone " low " front shock mount ?
I need to drop down my 2000 Cyclone's seat alittle and the low seat isn't low enough.
Thanks,
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, August 09, 2007 - 12:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Is the difference between standard and low configurations in the bracket or is it in the shock itself? My understanding is that the shock for the low configuration provides around one inch less of rear axle suspension travel but the same ride height at at fully "compressed" (shock is actually fully extended) condition. So what you have is a shock that in its fully retracted condition is a bit longer than that of the standard model.

Have you tried just increasing the sag (reducing rear shock preload) in order to lower the bike? In doing so, you'll probably want to increase the compression damping to help avoid bottoming.

Are you planning to make complementary adjustments to the front suspension as well? If not, then you will likely notice some undesirable effects in how your bike handles and rides.

(Message edited by Blake on August 09, 2007)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

S2pengy
Posted on Thursday, August 09, 2007 - 08:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

It is the shock itself that is shorter, I have one of each and while I cannot remember off hand I believe it is 7/8 of an inch shorter which lowered the bike I believe 1 1/8 inches... It has been a few years so please do quote me on these numbers....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Blake
Posted on Thursday, August 09, 2007 - 10:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The rear shock would have to be longer in order to lower the bike, yes? : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

S2pengy
Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 08:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Blake
Yes you are correct
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gbgbuell
Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 03:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thanks for the info.
I'll try adjusting the "sag", as Blake said.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Saturday, August 11, 2007 - 03:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Excessive sag can create problems too. Increasing sag beyond the specified parameters is not really a good way to lower the rear end of the bike (or the front). The handling will certainly be affected during braking and acceleration from the excessive rebounding of the suspension.

I encourage anyone who disagrees to try it on their bike and see exactly what happens. Change in front end geometry during braking is something we all take advantage of when entering corners, but these changes in geometry can also hurt you if it gets excessive.

I recommend doing it the way the factory did.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration