G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile

Buell Forum » Knowledge Vault (tech, parts, apparel, & accessories topics) » Drivetrain » Secondary Drive: Sprockets, Belt/Chain, Ratios » Chain Drive » Archive through July 25, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 01:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I just put a chain drive on my S1...the tension is set according to what instructors, service manuals, and racers have told me...but the damn chain nips at the battery tray supports if I take it over 110mph. At a standstill it seems impossible this could happen (stretching the chain by hand), but the gouges through the paint say it is so.

Anybody else run into this? Any fixes? I may end up putting a guard or another rub block in this area.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Udholmdk
Posted on Sunday, January 18, 2004 - 07:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

hey all Buellers.
I am the proud owner of an S1 lightning from 1998.
I am planning a Chain drive conversion kit, and have some questions.

1.is the Baker drivetrain kit OK.
2.Will it work better than the belt.
3.does it make more noise
4.does it give more power to the rear wheel.
5.how it a chain performing during long movements
up and down by the rear wheel
6.what about maintenance
7.which chain shall I choose

hope U can help me with some answers, my problem
is that I think a chain drive looks much better
on a sportbike, than the bulky belt drive.

Thanks a lot
udholmdk from Denmark

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fullpower
Posted on Tuesday, July 27, 2004 - 07:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

some answers, out of sequence. the chain will transmit more power to the rear wheel. the chain will make more noise. the chain will sling some lubricant. the chain is much stronger and more durable then any belt. for brand i recommend either RK 530 ENP (nickle plated oring) or Tsubaki 530 Sigma ( strongest oring chain available) either of these is easily capable of delivering over 10,000 miles of the worst abuse you can dish out. i have run both on an 89 inch sportster, and i abuse the drivetrain constantly, wheelies, burnouts, lots of gravel roads, and hundreds of miles in the rain. i put a new one on each spring, and have not had a failure.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jespo_m2
Posted on Monday, August 09, 2004 - 10:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hi,
I also want to put a chain setup on my S1. Should I go with a 520 or 530 chain setup. I'd like to use a wide link o-ring chain. Where can I buy a Buell chain and sprocket kit? Any one have one for sale? Thanks. : )
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Al_lighton
Posted on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 - 09:19 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Jeremy,
I'd go 530 o-ring if I was you. The 520 setup is for the racers out there that want to minimize chain/sprocket mass and are willing to replace it more often. We carry both at American Sport Bike (Baker), but are currently out of stock on both with a few kits on backorder. We used to assemble the kits from Bartels components, but the Baker kit is turnkey complete and includes a small roller assy that bolts to rear of the swingarm support bracket to keep the chain off the swingarm and support block. It's a cool part, but it does limit the front sprocket size (the 24 tooth is to big a diameter and will hit that roller bracket). Rear sprockets come in 48,50,52,and 54 teeth.

Al
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 - 12:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Someone needs to come up with an idler to take the slack off the bottom run of the chain for tubers. I'm going to home make one here soon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jespo_m2
Posted on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 - 06:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hi Al,
Thank you very much for the info! I have a dilema... My main reason for going to chain is that my belt needs to be replaced and I'd like to avoid the HUGE amount of work in replacing it.

However, it is a 97 and it would be a good time to replace bushings and bearings. The bushings are not ripped but they look their age.

What would you do?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Al_lighton
Posted on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 - 01:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Well, ME, I LIKE the belt drive. It's quiet, clean, less vibration. I've pulled the swingarm a few times, it's not that hard, just takes a few hours and the right way to hold up the bike. The new isolators are worth putting in, and while you didn't say your mileage, the swingarm bearings probably could use a good lube anyway.

So what *I* would do is replace the belt. But there are reasons for mounting a chain (ratio adjustability, failure/wear predictability, ease of replacement, etc). You gotta figure out what's more important to you.

Al
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Saturday, September 18, 2004 - 08:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I bought an LBV chain tensioner and modified it for use on my S1. The difference is incredible...no more chain slop or snatch and much less noise.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bluelightning
Posted on Monday, September 20, 2004 - 08:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Rick,

Got any pics of the tensioner on the bike?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Monday, September 20, 2004 - 09:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

No sir, I will get some, but it'll be a while.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Neversellit
Posted on Friday, October 15, 2004 - 12:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

May I Ask,
What is an "LBV" Chain Tensioner and where did you buy it?
Every Chain Drive Buell Needs this!
Thank You for any Info!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lee
Posted on Wednesday, October 20, 2004 - 10:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Are most the rear sprockets for Buell chain drives aluminum. I know the kit that Al sells at American Sport Bike has an aluminum rear. That scares me a little with my 88 inch...hell I even put steel on my dirtbikes for better wear. Maybe I'm just used to looking at cheap Sunstar alum sprockets that have all the teeth folded over. Do you chain guys have any problems with the aluminum? Does anyone have or run steel? Thanks, Lee
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Neversellit
Posted on Wednesday, October 20, 2004 - 04:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Lee,
The "Baker" kit I Installed has an Aluminum Rear and Steel Front Sprocket.
I think they are both "PBI".
530 DID X Ring Chain. (Not part of the Kit)
Seems Very Strong.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Neversellit
Posted on Wednesday, October 20, 2004 - 04:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Rick or Anybody,
Rick made reference to an "LBV" Chain Tensioner.
Is this a manufacturer?
Any Info would be greatly appreciated!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob_thompson
Posted on Thursday, October 21, 2004 - 02:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Lee, researching in the early days, I too was concerned with aluminum sprockets, but as I understand it from the engineers such as those at Morse, Link Belt and such in the industrial area: steel on steel wear at a given rate, aluminum on aluminum wear at a given rate and two different metals such as steel on aluminum wear at a signifigantly lower rate due to something called differenciation (spelling) of metals. Of course any lubricant that reduces friction will aid in this wear ratio. Also most aluminum sprockets are of an alloy that is very strong also. Think about the aircraft world and its use of aluminum. Hope I didn't bore you with what I understand is true.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lee
Posted on Friday, October 22, 2004 - 06:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Bob,

Not bored at all...good stuff. I do realize that some of these aluminums have a very high grade and provide good wear. I was just hoping to hear from some that run aluminum sprockets. But my mind is easing a bit...thanks.

Lee
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bomber
Posted on Friday, October 22, 2004 - 08:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Lee -- I've run aluminum sprokets on my thumper for years (hotrodded SR500, and people think that BUELLS shake!) -- clearly, neither HP nor torque are in the same ballpark, but that scoot's pretty hard on chains

the aluminum sprockets do wear, of course, but I can't tell much if any differeance from steel

Bob -- data is never boring, I'm thinkin
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Thursday, November 11, 2004 - 01:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

LBV Engineering is the company. I got mine through Custom Chrome...it's meant for a H-D 4-spd FL or FX model.

The only parts I used from the kit were the roller and arm. I converted the wound spring included to an extension spring from a hardware store, and mounted it to the engine brace on the lower bolt hole with a longer screw, some spacers and shims. I drilled and tapped a hole in the swingarm mounting block to secure the other side of the spring.

So far it's worked great but the spring I used has stretched so I've purchased a stronger one to replace it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rick_a
Posted on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 - 01:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Update on the LBV chain tensioner setup. I found that the setup was was not tolerant to stoppies or having the rear suspension land after being airborne in any way. I bent it twice then it broke. I'm getting another and reinforcing it. It used a thin cast arm which wasn't up to any such usage. If that doesn't work I'm working up something different all together.

(Message edited by Rick_a on April 20, 2005)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Djkaplan
Posted on Thursday, April 21, 2005 - 03:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

"the chain will transmit more power to the rear wheel"

I'm not disputing this, but could you explain why? I know from the machine design courses I took that a chain is more efficient than gears for transferring power, but I've never read anything about a toothed belt.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jlewis50
Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 09:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Just to throw fuel on the argument I feel a chain only gives you the ability to change final drive ratios easier than a belt. Belt drives can handle great amount of power efficiently and quietly. Chains are noisey and do require lube. Even the O or x ring variety.
Also, no one here has a HD or Buell that puts out serious Horse Power. If you put out over 140 hp go to a chain.
You ever see what powers the blowers on a Top Fuel racer? a Belt. I have read it takes over 400hp to just power one of the blowers at full boost. They could power it with a chain or gears but choose to power it with a big ole belt.

Joe
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Firemanjim
Posted on Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 01:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

My bike had a belt on it for 2 years at Bonneville,the last one was with 177+ HP,made it through innumerable dyno runs and 1/2 a dozen runs at speeds up to 177 mph.
I only changed to a chain set-up for ease of gearing changes and selection.520 chain with an aluminum rear sprocket--again no problems.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bluzm2
Posted on Saturday, May 21, 2005 - 01:06 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Joe,
Last I heard, a top fuel blower takes more power at top end than a NASCAR motor generates.
That's well over 800HP!!!!
But, it's still a belt! A darn big one but a belt none the less.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Crusty
Posted on Sunday, June 05, 2005 - 08:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Throw some 1/4" stones at the belt and at a chain. See which one snaps. Belts are quiet, efficient and require very little maintenance; but in the real world, where I do most of my riding, they are too delicate to be trustworthy. They're also a major pain in the aspirin to replace on an M2 or S3.
I really hated sitting on the side of I-71 on a Sunday afternoon with a broken belt.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Edv
Posted on Monday, June 20, 2005 - 05:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I just replaced the chain and sprockets on my 96 S-1, previously I had 24-54 sprockets and the chain would nick the regulator mount on acceleration so this time around I went with the 23-51 setup and now there is no contact at all other than at rest the chain rests on the alloy mount for the isolaters and I also notice there is less chain hop while accelerating with the smaller sprockets. The first set went from 35,400 miles to 48,600 so I figure that isn`t too bad all in all, if I can get 10.000 miles out of this set I will be happy.
Ed
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

S1hooligan
Posted on Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 02:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

The bike I bought has a chain conversion done already, it is the Baker I believe. Anyways, it at 38,000 the case cracked, guess where it was? Right next to the front sprocket. I am not sure what caused it, but my mechanic says he thinks the conversion is suspect, maybe a bad install, or maybe the chain had broke in the past, wrapped around the front sprocket some how and cracked it, then after I bought it, the cracked piece falls out...ouch...so on my new motor I am not sure if I am gonna put it back on. Any body else had this happen, or heard of it? The motor I bought has the belt pulley on it, but I don't have a rear pulley or belt.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kdkerr2
Posted on Saturday, June 25, 2005 - 08:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

There should have been some evidence if the chain caused the failure such as marks on the outside of the case. What I am getting at is the failure could have been just the result of a defective casting. The output shaft area is a high stress area so it would be prone to cracking if the metal around it were defective. Just my two cents for what its worth.
There is a 61 tooth Buell rear pulley on eBay. Item #4557986783. It's going for $35 but it will go up. MSRP on a new one is over $125.00 I think. Belts or at least new ones don't show up too often on eBay. New belts are about $135 MSRP too.
KK
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tripp
Posted on Thursday, July 14, 2005 - 07:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

on a 99+ cyclone, when switching to the chain drive can you keep the rear inner fender or does it have to go, and how about the lower belt guard and the front sprocket cover?
p.s. i'm still several days away from receipt of the baker chain kit.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tripp
Posted on Monday, July 25, 2005 - 10:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

more on the subject
http://www.badweatherbikers.com/buell/messages/4062/128849.html?1122301845
« Previous Next »

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration