G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » Balancing Allegiance with Rebellion, the H-D Way » Archive through June 18, 2009 » Touring bike fuel economy « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bigdog_tim
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 09:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I have an '09 Ultra with about 5300 miles on it. I love ALMOST everything about this bike - except the fuel economy. The bike is mechanically stock (except for an oil cooler) - and the BEST I get out of the bike is 38 MPG. I get that on my 1125R riding WOT all day.

I have done everything I could think of: I check tire pressure at least once a week (always 40 rear/36 front), oil changed at proper times (went to Amsoil at 5K miles), etc. I only by "good" gas (never at Arco - prefer 76, Chevron, Shell).

I traded an '01 Ultra with a big bore kit for this bike. My old Ultra would get 42-44 MPG no matter what - even riding two up.

I have already called Harley Customer Service. They weren't much help - I suspect discussing ANYTHING related to changing the fuelling on the bike won't get a great response from Harley (given the challenges with emissions, EPA, etc all manufacturers have).

So - am interested in hearing the fuel economy from other '09 touring bike owners. In the mean time, I will change primary and transmission fluids (go to synthetic on them). If that doesn't do anything - then I will look at adding an aftermarket fuel management system and dial in the air/fuel mixture myself.

This surprises me because I would EXPECT a factory bike to be EXTREMELY lean - and as a result get great fuel economy. Is it possible that the extreme leanness is also causing a loss of power that I make up for with more throttle? Seems counter intuitive - but....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Citified
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 03:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I am getting mid to upper 30s on my RG but I have just over 600 miles and never use 6th gear, plus heavy breather air cleaner, rush exhaust and stage 1 remap. So, hard tellin not knowin.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Road_thing
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 04:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I get similar mileage on my '96 Road King, but it's got a carb...

rt
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Baybueller
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 06:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

My guess is you are running ethanol blend gas. I have an 07 RG that got 50 mpg stock and now gets 40ish with sert,pipes etc. and a fat fuel/air mixture. Still pings at times, and this really bugs me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mark61
Posted on Sunday, March 29, 2009 - 01:28 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Y2K 95" Tw37g white bro.s 2 into 1 and Short Block Charley "scotsman" heads I get 42 to 50 mpg depending on ride style, road and fuel use. Even really hauling a$$ on the back roads it might be as low as 38 miles per gallon.

mark61
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Navygunner
Posted on Sunday, March 29, 2009 - 08:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

I would bet its Ethenol blend fuel issue also. I get 48ish all highway and 40 consistantly around town. I do have 9000 miles on my '09. Milage checked every fill up and has been consistant since break in.

Patrick
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bigdog_tim
Posted on Monday, March 30, 2009 - 12:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Hi Patrick - is your bike stock? I don't think my crappy fuel economy is based entirely on the Ethenol blend problem - I would have seen the same (if not worse) numbers on my '01.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Navygunner
Posted on Friday, April 03, 2009 - 09:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Yep, bone stock. I forgot to add that I have noticed slight differences filling at different stations across the state (Mainly ones in large urban areas I suspect to have ethenol blends). I touched 50 mpg on a trip to Lake Charles La filling in a county that doesn't have smog checks. I used the cruise that trip and maintained 75 mph. Perhaps yours will loosen up with miles......


Patrick
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration