G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Archive through July 20, 2004 » What type of Gas is best? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Coyote_xb12s
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 02:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

There was an article in this month's Motorcyclist about high octane gas and it doing more damage than good. Is it necessary to use 91 in the XBs? There is at least a .10 difference is price between 91 & 89. They said something in the article about saving your money... I'm not a mechanical wizard so just looking for opinions.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Battleblue03
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 03:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Well in the owners manual of your bike it says 91 or higher octane, should be ran in your bike. Trust me there is a difference between 89 and 91. I know from running 87 and 89 in my truck under hard excelleration my truck would ping with the 87 octane but doesnt do that with 89. So i would do what harley says and run no less than 91 i personally run Sunoco 96 in my bike and it runs great.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

M1combat
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 03:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

The lower octane will generate more carbon deposits yes? Every once in a while I throw 110 in mine and it cleans the exit of the pipe. The deposits nearly go away.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fullpower
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 04:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

91 is not available within 200 miles. normally i run 90 octane in buell, but am currently burning some 87 octane (partial fill-up) with no problems. i dont think these bikes are running a whole lot of compression, but possibly in a really hot climate one might need some higher octane fuel to prevent detonation with extremely high cylinder head temperatures.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 04:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

My 2000 M2 will ping under full acceleration with anything less then 91 octane. Like clockwork. More then 91 and it is (mostly) OK.

(which probably just means I need to set my timing... I did check the VOES and that seems to be working).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bomber
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 05:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

most MaDeuces I know rattle on less than 91 (I know mine does, and the timing is spot on factory setting)

bottom line is run what the manufacturer suggests (and, no, lower octane fuel doens' necessarily casue deposits, it's the synthetic turn sginal lube that does that)

;-}
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Fullpower
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 05:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

NEVER use synthetic turn signal lubricants on your Buell. They are too slippery, and will allow the electrons to slide, rather than roll across the switch contacts, thus causing premature failure. The motor company DOES NOT recommend synthetic lubricants in that application.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glitch
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 06:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

NEVER use synthetic turn signal lubricants on your Buell.
Says you! I've been running FULL synthetic and have had NO problems at all! And don't give me the ol' it'll void the warranty crap neither. I challenge you (or any "Buell Tech" ) to be able to tell just by looking, which lube I'm running in my turn signals.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 07:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

; ) Well, they used to say the full synthetic will flatspot your switch contacts, but since they released the new Screaming Eagle BlinkLube Full Synthetic, they now say it was fine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

2bbuell
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 07:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Remember to signal at least 500 left and right turns before changing to the syn turn signal lube, as it is so slippery, that the new signals will not seat properly, and will cause spurious signals in the wrong direction.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ortegakid
Posted on Friday, July 16, 2004 - 07:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

and you can't mix em ever,ever,ever!
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration