| Author | Message | ||
     Jonnyrotton |
I guess what I am asking is....when the Buell engineers sat down to design the XB platform(which would be unveiled to the whole world as the "new buell") and were testing and deciding on a bore and stroke configuration for the new motor. Was the 984 the bore and stroke they felt to be the best combination/compramise for over all performance? And then as the world got it's hands on the new Buell and declared it underpowered, that they then decided to address the power issue with the 1200? Or was the 984 meant to be the "600" later to be joined by the 1200 as the "1000" | ||
| Jaimec |
Was it really necessary to post the same question TWICE? We saw it the first time. | ||
| Froggy |
Looks like he accidentally double posted it onto a new thread somehow. At least he doesn't have a friend helping him relocate his license plate  | ||
| Buellinachinashop |
Jamie, the titles are obviously different......"Buell Reasoning" aimed at EB, the man. The other one encompasses Buell the company...."Buell's Reasoning" C'mon, surely you could see the difference after all these years of thread posting. | ||
| Cityxslicker |
I have a new Mikita drill and power saw I can loan, but only if I get to video the carnage for youtube. |
