G oog le BadWeB | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Motorcycle Forum » XBoard » Buell XBoard Archives » Archive through June 29, 2007 » That's the best bike mag? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

River
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 01:36 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Since getting back into bikes a few months back I've been devouring every bike magazine I find. Damn there's a lot out there - but a lot of average amongst them. Best two I've read so far from the many are Bike and Performance Bike, both from the UK. What's the best bike mag in the States? (good writing and entertaining stories being the main ask because it's a mag I want, not a tech manual.)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Samiam
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 01:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I personally like Cycle World. YMMV as always though.

Sam
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

07xb12scg
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 08:12 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I personally like Cycle World.
+1. I subscribe to Cycle Word and Motorcyclist and Motorcyclist has changed for the worse since the new editor has taken over. It's trying to be like Cycle World IMO, but it just can't cut it. To its credit, though Aaron Frank did choose the Ulysses as his long term bike.

Cycle World has all types of street bikes and dirt bikes and many interesting articles with good writing. Plus, they don't live by the top speed is everything mantra.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kuuud
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 08:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

CW is great for all-around info. Also try Motorcycle Consumer News. They're the best for product testing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Reepicheep
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 08:31 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I prefer Cycle World as well...

www.motorcycle.com has some great reading as well... especially if you can dig up some John Burns stuff.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

12r
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 08:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I can relate to Cycle World and Motorcyclist more than our UK-based magazines. The sportsbike group tests involve putting the bikes in a van and heading for a racetrack in the south of France. At least your journos ride on the road
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jaimec
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 07:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I'm a big fan of Rider magazine, myself. They were the first to review the XB12Ss Lightning Long (and it was a good write up, too).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Teeps
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 08:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Cycle World, only because of Kevin Cameron.

The other rags are good for the pictures.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kowpow225
Posted on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 09:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Cameron's a genius...and a really good writer as well.
I prefer Sportrider for the technical stuff and interesting data. Some (much) of it contradicts itself though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jaimec
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 08:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

I miss "Battle2Win"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Trojan
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 08:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Performance Bikes, without a doubt.
Although this months issue has a test of the XB12R that is not too complimentary.

'The brakes are weak and prone to fade. So much for Buell's revolutionary rim mounted technology. Give me a pair of four pot calipers and some 320mm discs. Or at least let me have two of those rim mounted jobbies'.

'Despite achieving the slowest top speeds of all the bikes tested, the braking point still remains the most conservative'.

'The best of the power is located a hairs breath from the rev limiter, which is savage enough to give you concussion from a helmet/screen interface if you hit it!'

'The swingarm gets incredibly hot. Why not just fit a nice alloy sump in the subframe rather than add to the unsprung weight?'

It did have a few good things to say though.

'It leans and leans and leans. High corner speed is totally effortless. I take back everything I said, it is only when approaching or leaving the corners that the Buell runs into trouble'.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jaimec
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 09:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

So the swingarm gets hot... who cares? One of the strangest criticisms I've ever heard. As for the brakes being weak... they're already strong enough to loop the bike if you're not careful... how much stronger do they have to be?

I'll agree in regards to brake fade ON THE RACE TRACK but I've yet to experience brake fade on the street (where I spend 99.9% of my time).

Sometimes I think writers criticize things just because they're different...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Xb12randy
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 11:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

How much stronger do they need to be?

Have you ridden a new Jap bike or Ducati with the relatively new Radial Mounted calipers. :o

Those things stop like crazy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jaimec
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 11:28 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Again... the brake is strong enough to loop the bike over. You don't want it to be any stronger. Shortening brake distances has less to do with front brake strength and more to do with longer wheelbases. Cruisers actually stop FASTER than sportbikes because both tires remain on the ground. You CAN'T make the ZTL any more powerful without making it DANGEROUS.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sloppy
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 12:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

You folks are NUTS.

C'mon - it's PENTHOUSE!!! They've got chicks on bikes...

Tired of flipping through a magazine where half the pages are ADS!!! Or articles that are clearly biased to sell more ad space!!! The best bike mag out there is Motorcycle Consumer News, no question about it. Try it for a year -- if you want a quality mag, you will have to pay for it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

07xb12scg
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 12:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

'The best of the power is located a hairs breath from the rev limiter, which is savage enough to give you concussion from a helmet/screen interface if you hit it!
I disagree with that! The best of the power is located much lower.

And isn't there a soft rev limiter to warn you of the hard rev limiter?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Court
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 01:30 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Actually. . . I must say that the Penthouse photo shoot I worked for Harley-Davidson media group is one of the funnest assignments I've ever drawn. . . .
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Trojan
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 02:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

for the brakes being weak... they're already strong enough to loop the bike if you're not careful... how much stronger do they have to be?


I know plenty of pure road riders who have run out of brakes and suffered from major fade problems. It isn't just my opinion (although I agree with the article) ;)

I disagree with that! The best of the power is located much lower.

don't confuse maximum torque with maximum power. Max torque is indeed much lower down but max power is right up there near the rev limit.

And isn't there a soft rev limiter to warn you of the hard rev limiter?

No I don't think so, and certainly not that I've ever noticed. You just hit the rev limiter and that's it, all over.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kowpow225
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 02:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Theres a soft limit and the true 'not going any further' limit. In my experience the soft cuts power slightly (almost like it's firing on one cylinder) and the hard limit is like you flipped the kill switch momentarily.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

07xb12scg
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 08:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

don't confuse maximum torque with maximum power. Max torque is indeed much lower down but max power is right up there near the rev limit.
You're right. It's just that power and torque seems to be used so interchangeably in magazines that I assumed they were talking torque since, after all, this is a Buell engine they were talking about!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bobolt
Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 08:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

at less than a buck an issue with a subscription, Cycle World is a steal. who cares what anybody else says about your bike, as long as you're satisfied with it?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cityxslicker
Posted on Friday, June 29, 2007 - 02:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only)

Sorry, but The Horse gets a nod of the hat , always nice to see what the backyard engineers that work for a living are doing to the bikes
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and custodians may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration