| Author | Message | ||
     Buellfirebolt31 |
06 XB12R with a Carbon Fiber Jardine with 5k miles on it, Race ECM, Buell Race Filter, and an extremely modified air box cover.... 91.8 Peak HP and 75.9 Peak Lbs. Torque. There is a dip between 2300-2500, but it cleans up with a really curve all the way to 6800. Pretty good I thought. I was expecting mid 80's and higher 60's. So I'm impressed. | ||
| Tommy_k |
Not bad...esp. hp #'s. What alt. are you at up there?? TK | ||
| Glitch |
Sweet! Do you have a scan of the dyno sheet? | ||
| Beachbuell |
I have similar numbers with my 2004 XB12R. Except my torque is up around 80. I'll have to look for my print out with the actual numbers, but The bike runs GREAT, the air/fuel ratio line is near perfect. Buell did GREAT job in designing/engineering that race kit for the bikes. I pulled my plugs last week as part of my 10K service and they could not have looked better. I am very happy with my Buell and the factory race kit. | ||
| Buellfirebolt31 |
I don't have a sheet because the computer didn't have a printer hooked up with it....eventually i can get one tho cause i work there. we were just testing a new computer out, so i figured we could use my bke. we'll do it again i'm sure. i don't know what altitude we are, but im in northern va 30 miles south of dc so its not too high. | ||
| Rogue_biker |
I just went back and read some of the magazine Dyno numbers on STOCK XB12's. They're about where your bike is at. 92 rwhp. 76 lbs torque. And if you look at the crank hp of 105, 92 rwhp sounds just right. So did you NOT gain any power from the pipe and race ECM? (Message edited by rogue_biker on November 10, 2006) | ||
| Beachbuell |
Rogue_biker..... Do not believe everything you read. There are a lot of variables that will give bikes different results. Altitude, Dyno calibration, Tire pressure, Fan machine placement... Just to name a few. I was very surprised at how "low" I thought my numbers were at first, even a little disappointed. But, these are real world numbers. | ||
| Buellfirebolt31 |
Actually, I thought you lose an average of 20% through the drive line. so 20% would be 110.2 HP at the crank. All in all i'm pleased cause i can feel the difference. | ||
| Luckydevil |
anybody have an altitude correction formula? I took mine in to a shop that was running free dyno time. it had a peak hp of 85.5 at 5400+ feet (a little higher than denver proper) |
