| Author | Message | ||
     Thansesxb9rs |
That they have an 82 cubic inch motor pushing 139HP!! Any truth to this rumor, if so whats the cost and when can I have it done?  | ||
| Richieg150 |
Do you mean Nallins,or NHRS? | ||
| M1combat |
It's NRHS and Aaron Wilson. Or Richard Nallin (I think Aaron bought the company for him, but from what I can tell, it's every bit as good as it ever was. They were partners before? Anyway... That sounds about right... Have you taken a peek at the dyno of Aaron's LSR bike?  Holy Fn WOW! | ||
| Dbird29 |
What cc is 82 inches? | ||
| M1combat |
Isn't that around 1350? | ||
| Blake |
That's nothing, they had a 100" mill pushing well over 200 RWHP and a 72" stock displacement Cyclone making over 120 RWHP. And I know of a Buell Lightning with an 88" engine that bested a new R1 in a head-to-head dyno drag race not too long ago. It is reportedly making an honest 155+ SAE RWHP. Not for the faint of heart. Call Cycle-Rama for more information. | ||
| Court |
If you are buying performance parts and stray much beyond either NRHS (Aaron Wilson) or Cycle-Rama (Wes Brown) you are a test pilot. | ||
| Koz5150 |
Don't forget places like Hoban Brothers and HALS Performance Advantage. Both have solid race teams and Buell knowledge. | ||
| Court |
Good point.... | ||
| Jerseyguy |
82 CI = 1343.7 cc Sorry, I can't help myself. (Message edited by JerseyGuy on March 30, 2005) | ||
| Gowindward |
Jersey, let's go ahead and teach them how to fish.  And for the Math challenged. 1in. = 2.54cm 1cu = 2.54cm x 2.54cm x 2.54cm = 16.387cc 16.387cc x 82 = 1343.7 | ||
| Brucelee |
That Cycle Rama stuff is very very tempting! | ||
| Cruisin |
How about for the really mathematically challenged? Go to http://www.google.com in the search field type (without quotes): "82 cubic inch to cubic centimeter" and hit enter. Result: "82 (cubic inch) = 1343.73925 cubic centimeter" Works for any conversion you need...} (Message edited by CruiSin on March 30, 2005) | ||
| Blake |
Google is amazing. | ||
| Sleez |
i use; http://www.onlineconversion.com for all my conversions, very handy! | ||
| Fullpower |
i have an 89 inch sportster, 5 speed, that would be a LOT of fun in an M2 cyclone chassis. | ||
| Rocketman |
As is the usual case for an Englishman, what if you're nowhere near Google when you need to know? I remember from Harley model history 61 cubic inch is as near as damn it 1000cc. Remember the XLX61? Then I can pretty much work it out from there in my head  Rocket | ||
| Slaughter |
302 cubic inches (Ford) = 5 Litres That's about the only conversion I remember - otherwise I have to work it out the slow way every freaking time - 2.54 cm/in | ||
| Kowpow225 |
Mathematics at its finest!  | ||
| Rocketman |
Did you hear about the great mathematician who had constipation? He worked it out with a pencil! Rocket | ||
| Slaughter |
Did you hear about the great mathematician who had constipation? He worked it out with a pencil! Rocket I've had "moments" like that... | ||
| Kaese |
I've given up on the pencil except for crosswords. Found this simple and easy to use conversion program that converts anything into a different unit of measure, and best of all it is free. http://www.joshmadison.com/software/convert/ | ||
| Slaughter |
We use the joshmadison convert.exe at work You can use google.com and do pretty complicated conversions type in 88 cubic inches to cc 88 (cubic inches) = 1 442.06163 cc Or type any other conversion (as if anybody wanted to know): 1200 cubic centimeters to cubic furlongs 1200 (cubic centimeters) = 1.47402399 × 10^(-10) cubic furlongs (ok, I can't do superscripts here) | ||
| Richieg150 |
Brian Nallin used to be at NRHS.He is now at http://www.revperf.com/ and also carries performance parts for our Buells,that you wont be a test pilot on. NRHS and Cycle-Rama are also top notch places to get your parts,but its good to have a few places to shop at. | ||
| Richieg150 |
I will try this again...http://www.revperf.com/home.aspx | ||
| Blake |
Superscript is easy here... 1.47402399\+{-10} yields... 1.47402399-10  (Message edited by blake on April 02, 2005) | ||
| Slaughter |
Thanks Blake. I was worried about presenting my S3's displacement properly in cubic furlongs. | ||
| Blake |
I'm still wondering about the 82 IN3 139 HP bike and who has it. And what's 139 HP in sled dog power (SDP)? Google didn't have anything for that. |
