G oog le Buell 1125R Forum | Login/out | Topics | Search | Custodians | Register | Edit Profile


Buell Forum » 1125R Superbike Board » Archives 001 » Archive through December 27, 2010 » Eslick lap times 1125 vs 600? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Duphuckincati
Posted on Sunday, December 26, 2010 - 07:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Anyone happen to have a record of Eslick's lap times at various tracks between the Buell in 2009 and the GSXR 600 this year? Just wondering.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rsh
Posted on Sunday, December 26, 2010 - 08:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

All is available on the AMA Pro race site in the archives section.


http://results.amaproracing.com/

Here is Auto Club Speedway Danny Eslick 2009 (Buell) vs. 2010 (Suzuki)

9 Daniel Eslick
Buell 1125R
LAP SEG 1 SEG 2 SEG 3 LAPTIME
0 1:16.452 31.769 44.683 - P
0 7:39.704 28.603 24.723 8:33.029
1 52.484 19.143 17.941 1:29.568
2 51.470 19.076 17.829 1:28.375
3 51.317 19.230 17.744 1:28.291
4 51.157 18.964 17.805 1:27.926
5 50.945 19.074 17.813 1:27.833
6 51.157 19.224 17.882 1:28.263
7 51.223 19.005 17.887 1:28.115
8 51.206 19.061 17.823 1:28.090
9 51.224 19.256 17.850 1:28.330
10 51.357 19.176 17.940 1:28.473
11 51.315 19.028 17.952 1:28.295
12 51.525 19.153 18.076 1:28.754
13 51.652 19.051 17.922 1:28.625
14 51.871 19.115 18.388 1:29.374
15 51.664 19.104 17.902 1:28.669
16 52.553 19.325 17.967 1:29.844
17 51.948 19.207 17.962 1:29.117
18 52.138 19.347 17.904 1:29.389
19 52.881 19.339 18.170 1:30.391
20 52.307 19.297 18.135 1:29.739
21 52.555 19.520 19.661 1:31.737
50.945 18.964 17.744
AVG
1:27.653
51.712
IDEAL
19.176 18.026 1:28.914

#1 Danny Eslick Suzuki GSXR 600

S1 S2 S3
1 2:30.9750 19.3100 18.4030
2 1:28.6480 51.2020 19.2050 18.2410
3 1:28.2930 51.1670 18.9490 18.1770
4 1:28.1440 50.9560 19.090 18.1790
5 1:28.2780 51.820 18.9990 18.1970
6 1:27.9320 50.8720 18.9140 18.1460
7 1:28.4460 51.110 19.840 18.3510
8 1:28.4240 51.4140 18.8050 18.2050
9 1:27.8040 50.7230 18.8640 18.2170
10 1:28.1730 50.8950 19.200 18.2580
11 1:28.7980 51.4240 19.120 18.3620
12 1:28.5320 51.7470 18.7700 18.150
13 1:28.8780 51.8670 18.8350 18.1760
14 1:27.9350 50.8940 18.8670 18.1740
15 1:29.4200 52.560 19.2070 18.1570
16 1:28.7830 51.5690 19.200 18.1940
17 1:28.140 50.8160 18.9340 18.2640
18 1:28.360 51.190 18.9370 18.800
19 1:28.670 51.530 18.9300 18.840
20 1:28.6660 51.5890 18.7880 18.2890
21 1:28.1280 51.060 18.9620 18.1600
MIN 1:27.8040 50.7230 18.7700 18.1460
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Duphuckincati
Posted on Sunday, December 26, 2010 - 08:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Thanks, so in this case looks like his best on the Buell was lap five @ 1:27.833 and the Suzuki lap 9 @ 1:27.804. Close enough. I'll try that site for others.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Duphuckincati
Posted on Sunday, December 26, 2010 - 08:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Doing a quick look at Infinion, Laguna and Road America it does seem like he's a couple of seconds quicker on the Suzuki at Infinion and Road America and a tiny bit slower at Laguna. Sorta backs up the idea of the 1125 vs 600's as making some sort of sense.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dannybuell
Posted on Sunday, December 26, 2010 - 10:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Good question!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Duphuckincati
Posted on Monday, December 27, 2010 - 02:32 am:   Edit Post Delete Post View Post/Check IP Print Post    Move Post (Custodian/Admin Only) Ban Poster IP (Custodian/Admin only)

Seems there was a notable improvement in tires from '09 to '10 from what I'm reading elsewhere. So that has some to do with it too. Dunlop said it was good for 1 1/2 second a lap at Fontana for everyone.
« Previous Next »

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a public posting area. Enter your username and password if you have an account. Otherwise, enter your full name as your username and leave the password blank. Your e-mail address is optional.
Password:
E-mail:
Options: Post as "Anonymous" (Valid reason required. Abusers will be exposed. If unsure, ask.)
Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Rules | Program Credits Administration